- NEW!
by ExactlyTwentyLetters on October 28th, 2009
I don't see the issue...his son was murdered by Muslim terrorists.
by Shes Country on October 28th, 2009
Since his son was murdered by Muslim terrorists, I think he should do that, if that is what he chooses to do.
by Baggins on October 28th, 2009
I say, let him. It was his son. He has all the right to put whatever he thinks his son would have wanted. Besides, it's true.
by alaveno on October 28th, 2009
i am proud of him. if it was my son id had that and more engraved on the head stone.
by Blackberry. on October 29th, 2009
Well, he wouldn't be lying lol.
by Gone on October 28th, 2009
He can put anything he likes on his sons grave,,,period.
by Mosexy on October 29th, 2009
I feel sad for him that he would chose to memorialize his son with words of bitterness and contempt rather than beautifying his son's life and positive qualities.
I don't see a reason to be opposed to it if that's what he really wants, but it just doesn't seem emotionally healthy to me.
by iBambi on October 28th, 2009
They weren't muslim. They were muslim-like. Suicide is a great sin in Islam, only the radicals preach it isn't, and by that point they're not even really preaching the koran anymore.
by knownothing on November 3rd, 2009
I think he is brutally honest.
by Phillis - Zacks little sister on October 29th, 2009
It is what it is. Call it like you see it. If anyone is offended, it's probably because their child wasn't the one murdered by Muslim terrorists. Let the world read it and weep. +5
by Dipstick08 on October 28th, 2009
I think he should be allowed to, but it's a bad idea. He'll figure out though when he visits the memorial in the future and instead of being able to think about the good things about his son, he'll only be able to focus on his death.........It all sounds like a really sad situation to me.......I think in turn someone should put "Murdered by the Government" hahaha
by Nickeljeff on October 28th, 2009
I haven't heard of this, so I don't know all the facts. However, I believe he has the right to put whatever he wants on his sons tombstone, as long as he doesn't go against his sons wishes. It might fuel more hanger and bigotry, and that is a down side. Anger and grief are hard to let go of, and maybe it might not be the right thing to do, but might also be part of his grieving process. I say its OK. If I was in his situation I can't say what I would do. I guess I would like to think that I would put something more about his life than his death.
by CaptainHarley adores his life penguin on November 3rd, 2009
More power to him. That's exactly how he died.
by Kingpinn on November 3rd, 2009
I'd say that he's free to write whatever he wants. To leave out the word "Muslim" is to be politicaly correct. These murderers wrap themselves in Islam then get pissed when we call a spade a spade. Those are my thoughts.
by peterpam on November 3rd, 2009
Surely freedom of speech allows it.
by BigEvan on November 3rd, 2009
if its his sons memorial i think he can do whatever to F**k he wants
by weatherman taking week or so off on November 3rd, 2009
No need to bring religion into it. Leave off the "Muslim". It only perpetuates the hate. You don't see stuff like that on the graves of pre or post civil rights US southern blacks, Israeli athletes (Munich 72), Salem "witches", victims of the Spanish Inquisition, etc.
by Anonymous on November 3rd, 2009
"Three cheers!" for him!
Does anyone truly believe muslims were NOT in any involved in 9/11?
by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on October 29th, 2009
petty. if a serial killer of his own religion had killed his son would have have put that on his sons grave? did not think so. this serves no purpose other than to blame the actions of the fringe on the mainstream. the terrorists are violating islamic laws.
by AnonymousGirl on October 29th, 2009
Well, it sounds to me like he's brave.
by Moongrim on October 29th, 2009
I don't see a problem.
by tintin on November 3rd, 2009
I think it's distasteful. True, but unnecessary. Perhaps even slightly disrespectful to his son, who was much more than just murdered by muslim terrorists. He could have been a son, a father, a brother - to minimize his life to the terms of his death I think is focused more on how he died than the life he lived, and that the life he lived is more important. I would have chosen something more meaningful to what made him who he is, rather than what he became on 9/11.
by Stu B in his fleece-lined COAT on November 3rd, 2009
Sounds highly appropriate...
by ladyshakespeare on November 3rd, 2009
id donate to help him pay for it
by Megan on November 3rd, 2009
No issue,he lost his son. It's the truth
by tenderness on October 29th, 2009
I think that he is right and people will respect his choice.
by Thinker on November 3rd, 2009
He is free to put whatever he wants on the memorial but he should be putting the correct people on there, the C.I.A. of the United States. There is too much evidence there is no way Muslims or any group or individuals of them could have pulled this off on this scale.
I am sure there will be many that disagree but don't accept things at face value do a little research and you can uncover much to show it was not muslims who did this.
by SIR_Anony is now SIR_Anthony on November 3rd, 2009
That's okay with me. That is what happened so why not post the facts of his son's death on the memorial if it bring his family closure.
by Factotum on November 3rd, 2009
In no particular order;
.
1) Freedom of speech.
.
2) It's true from any reasonable standpoint.
.
3) He is (presumably) either paying for the memorial or in charge of the inscription.
.
I realize that there are good Muslim people who will feel aggrieved by such an inscription. I ask that you compare your grief to the father's and let it go.
by Timjon on November 3rd, 2009
He should have the freedom to do so. It is the truth, after all.
by Answerbag.com on November 3rd, 2009
They were Muslims terrorists, but it still has a discriminating tone. I wouldn't put that on my son's gravestone. I would say, "Killed in 9/11."
by Spirit of the Nomad on November 3rd, 2009
I wouldn't put Muslim in the engraving, this type of association is what causes a lot of racism, misunderstanding and hate and less hate would do wonders for preventing more tragedies like 9/11.
If it were me I would put something to honor my sons life and memory but they didn't kill my son and the grieving father has the right to put whatever he wants on his boy's headstone.
by gsehyetuhetuyqyh on September 11th, 2011
I would just shorten it to muslims. Muslim, terrorist are the same thing.
Why is ground zero called that?
by Answerbag Staff on March 26th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Why was 9/11 an inside job?
by Have A Nice Day on October 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
do you believe 100% that the US gov and the bush admin are the ones behind the destruction of WTC tower in the 9/11 attack?
by ctopz666 on October 22nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Aside fr lives lost, are you glad the World Trade Center Towers are gone? Were they "like knives in the liver of the city.." as Dardon sd?
by GibsonGuy on October 3rd, 2011
| 2 people like this
Lloyd's insurer sues Saudi Arabia for 'funding 9/11 attacks Does this give you pause? How so?
by Wynper on September 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading What are your thoughts on this man who wants to put "Murdered by Muslim terrorists" on the memorial for his son, who died in the 9/11 attacks?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments