Well I'm not sure that your assertion about the correlation between God and evolution beliefs is accurate. But, the reason creationists try to undermine evolution is simple: the Bible says the Earth was created in 6 days by God, including all the animals and people. That disagrees severely with evolution. So, one must conclude that one or both accounts are wrong. If evolution is correct, the Bible must be wrong. If the Bible is wrong, it calls into question what ELSE might be wrong in the Bible. So those who have hitched their wagon to the principle that the Bible is the inerrant word of God have a real problem if evolution is true. Thus the compelling need to undermine evolution, in order to preserve that principle of Biblical inerrancy.

The majority know that there is nothing wrong with believing in both.The two belief systems are not at odds with each other at all.Scientists proven the universe is trillions of years old and the earth is billions of years old.It is the fringes of some religions that believe differently.

This, actually, as my research shows, is simply not true! TRY THE WORK: TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE! BY DENIS TOWERS QUESTION: Do you believe in evolution? Why, or why not?? Dad’s ANSWER: I guess that for myself, I do not just Believe it NOT to be true, I have literally proven that it is NOT - SCIENTIFICALLY! There are 2 "animals" that specifically and comprehensively disprove evolutionary theory: Snake & Man. WHY?? you may ask. They are Precise opposites in everything - both behaviourally and anatomically!! As a Specialist Anatomist and Kinesiologist, I undertook a comparative study over nearly 10 years, discovering, then proving, this great, yet simple, phenomenon WHY DO YOU SAY THEY ARE OPPOSITE?? you may say. You may also say, "Well, if they are precise opposites, Why do they both have backbones and breathe air, and have many other apparently similar internal organs?” In answering this, it needs to be both - recognized and acknowledged that "kinds" of organism [or species] cannot simply defy the Higher overall laws of nature itself, simply to accent a differentiation of species. That is the number 1 rule of comparative science. What I am saying here is that because of their size, and land-dwelling nature, etc., they are necessarily Both vertebrate, and require some similarity in alimentary system, etc., simply to live efficiently and to satisfy the requirements of effective survival according to their overall land-dwelling nature. Comprehensively, I speak particularly of venomous ground snakes in this study. There, after satisfying the natural laws of nature and of effective and satisfactory existence itself, their 'similarities' completely end! Thereafter, they are total opposites in everything – in terms of all differentiation among the beasts that exist. In fact, a very close examination will reveal that snakes cannot be more unlike other beasts, either, if they tried! For that matter, neither could Man be more different than everything else!! ... and that is, despite all the claims of genetics, etc., that various species [of ape, etc.] possess 99% similarity with the DNA of Man. Despite all this supposed similarity, there is nothing that really well compares to Man at all among the beasts that exist - especially, behaviourally. Now this extraordinary discovery of total opposites tends to disprove random chance mutation – per evolutionary theory. It also confirms a deliberation in Creation – it tends to most powerfully support that there is a God in nature – determining the nature of matters and designing them, according to His own purposes. Similarly, it also powerfully supports the Biblical account of Adam and Eve, wherein it was the very serpent, itself, in fact, which was used by Satan to oppose God to Eve. As you may recall, as a result of this act by the serpent, God cursed all things – changing them – but none so greatly as the snake!! [See Holy Bible] Obviously, as this study shows, among all the changes that were made was the symbolic representation re the snake that epitomized this very act of its Opposition to Man and God!! A Master Achievement re early Biblical Proofs … would you not think?? God, only, can be thanked for it, under His direction, guidance and revelation!

i fail to agree i am atheist and do not believe in any god or religion. creationist are afraid of the reality that their 6 days creation is a joke so they tend to be confused but reject the billions of years of proof .

Because your assumption is untrue.

Creationists are, first and foremost, fundamentalists. Evolution does away with their fantasy something they can't allow under any means because it would destroy the foundation of their belief and would take away control of the masses away from them. At the end of the day, it's got nothing to do with belief and everything to do with power, control and money

We all have ideas that are valid. So everyone is right and wrong at the same time, who's to say.

It's called Bibliolatry. They're under the mistaken impression that the Bible is inerrant. And as such HAS to be taken literally. That God himself simply refuse to allow a bible to be mistranslated. Which is rather ironic concerning Bill Clinton and the story of the Wicked Bible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible