ANSWERS: 29
-
the later one....okay im guessing
-
The structure is undefined. Neither of the two statements can be either true or false, so this structure cannot stablize. This is the sort of logical construct that will cause a computer program to go into an infinite loop.
-
Let's see. If the one to the left is true, then the one to the right makes the one to the left false.... That don't work! If the one to the right is true, the one to the left is false, which means the one to the right is false... No... If the one to the left is true, the one to the right makes the one to the left false, making the one to the right true... Is that right? If the one... Uh... If the... uh... ARRRRRGGGG!!!!
-
I think that's an appropriate metaphor for mankind's quest to understand his place in the great, grand scheme of life, time, the universe, and what lies beyond. In other words, it's so deep that I have no idea what to think about it, lol.
-
Time is a factor. The first sentence was written in ANCTIPATION of the second sentence. And since (presumably) the writer is not a fortune teller, (s)he could only guess that the following sentence would be true. The second sentence just tries to create an ass of the first sentence by setting up an intentional conundrum. By the time writer gets around to writing it, knows what the previous sentence said. The point of the excercise is...there is no point. Or: "I am going to write a conundrum."
-
i think you lie
-
I think both sentences are incorrect.
-
Infinity
-
I think about the far away splatter of my brains as my head exploded.
-
I think you got hold of some really good stuff.
-
the "which is correct?" part..... :)
-
"but the previous statement was false" the real question, are they technically statements? You make me want to go to subway. .
-
I think the second sentence is false as in incorrect. because it should read "The previous sentence was false".
-
A waste of words and a lame question.
-
What statement? All I can see is a question with commas in. Did you mean to present two sentences followed by a question? If so it is a duplicate.
-
That altho' all things may be interconnected, they perhaps have no causal relationship whatsoever? ;-)
-
Isn't this what they call a "double bind"?
-
you just wasted 2 seconds of my life... oh well :)
-
yes. no. yes. no. yes. no.
-
it's called a deadlock situation
-
I think you've gone mad..lol
-
I think it's a bog-standard paradox.
-
It represents an endless cycle of pointless recrimination.
-
Who knows? They counter-act each other.What can you believe?*+++++*
-
False. That's a good one.
-
If the first one is true then, that makes the second one false, but if the first one is false, the second one is also false. Not really that hard when you take it apart.
-
false
-
Then it would follow that since the first is false and the preceding is true than the whole thing is false. + 5
-
Fun question. False, assuming that the second sentence is meant to read, "sentence" instead of "question". If it really is supposed to read "question, then we's have to know which question it refers to as "preceeding". A more powerful turn of the truth paradox is the statement: "Everything I say is a lie!"
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC