if it is, i'm in trouble. i can't help my self!

Not by itself ... but many sinners are heterosexuals ...

NO or YES - depends on how you want to look at it - I saw NO

Thou shalt not murder Thou shalt not commit adultery Thou shalt not steal Thou shalt not bear false witness Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house. Thou shalt not reproduce

To hell with me if it is because I love men!

No. We are created by God to be that way. Sex between a man and a woman is not wrong unless it is outside of the bounds of marriage. I hope that this is helpful. :) -In the service of the Master. Thank you and God bless you!

It must be. According to some, I'm going straight to Hell because I like "shemales". I am a female, she has a Y-chromosome and still has a penis... yeeeeah. Being effeminate is apparently a sin, so unless I'm ovulating, I'm screwed! :P

Well, according to Evan, Gay God of Hotpants and Leather Chaps, being heterosexual is not a sin per say. It is, in his words "Oooooh such a waste....".

If it is it is ok, because I was born that way.

If it were every one of our fathers and mothers are doomed. If you were a quaker though, all sex is a sin so yes in some rare belief systems it can be but it makes continuation of the human race a sin. This question answers itself really.

That's got to be one of the top ten silliest questions I have yet to see on this site. Having too many children that you cannot support is shameful because you're depriving all those kids of a proper chance to develop as happy & healthy children.

I really hope you are not serious. If you are, then I have lost even more hope for the future of humanity. Of course being heterosexual isn't a sin. It is a requirement that some be hetero in order to continue the human race. If all were homosexual, then the only way new humans would be born is through sperm banks, and surrogate mothers...

Having heterosexual intercourse is a sin in some religions if its before marriage, but not having heterosexual tendancies in itself or homosexual tendancies for that matter, but some religions dont condone that kind of behavior at any time because they dont condone same sex marriages, religions vs. overall public tolerance of certain things is such a messy topic these days. All we can do is try to be tolerant and respectful of everybody's opinion on these kinds of issues and be open minded to opinions different than our own.

No, not at all. It is the right thing to do.

An excerpt from A Higher Good: "...Those bigots who wave the Bible at homosexuals and call them a “abomination” should also take note that the same text tells us that it is also an “abomination” punishable by death to eat shellfish, to approach the alter of God if you have a defect in sight (it doesn’t say, however, whether you can do so with corrective lenses), for men to have their hair trimmed, for a farmer (presumably also a gardener) to plant two different crops in the same field, or for a woman to wear garments with two different kinds of threads (such as cotton/polyester blends). Unfortunately, it doesn’t give any guidance according to degrees of “abominations,” so we are left to assume that we are morally bound to burn or stone people for any of these offenses, including all those who work on the Sabbath, which, when you get right down to it, would include most of the clergy. It does say, however, that it is permissible to own slaves, providing they are purchased from neighboring nations, which begs the question: is it alright for Americans to own Mexicans, but not Canadians? It also says in Exodus that one can sell their daughter into slavery. The Bible, however, doesn’t give us any guidelines for a fair price. Guess that’s negotiable, too..."

Cheese whiz, I hope not yo...

No more than being any other way is.