- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Well, given that they're somewhere north of 40% of voters (probably north of 48%), they probably have some kind of "relevance." Even if they're dumber than toasters.
HAHA....Good question. +3
screw me up once, shame on you!!!
screw me up twice, shame on me!!!
screw me up three times, shame on both of us!!!
screw me up four times ... gosh, we never came up with an ending for that last one, i guess we figured that nobody could ever be so dumb!!!
Perhaps because his campaign promises were in tune with their personal opinions. At least George 43 did not attempt to deflect questions about his actions with semantic games such as, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
I expect your question will soon be applicable to Barack. Will he resort to this response "It depends on what the meaning of 'transparent' or 'change' is."
and your saying Senator Kerry was a better choice than Bush?
Back in the day who said "Reaganomics" was all voodoo?
by -O-uknow on July 4th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
America was really very safe from terrorism before george w bush?
by greenbackfrog on May 7th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Is the double-santa claus theory a pretty good summation of GW Bush´s terms in office?
by n1kkigirl on June 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Should George W. Bush be prosecuted for murder?
by purplecows on May 30th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why are Bush & Cheney scared to attend the Ground Zero celebration with President Obama?
by Halliburton Shill on May 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why is it that the same people who voted for Bush not once, but TWICE, seem to think their opinion on politics has any sort of relevance?
Comments
Great answer.
by Entertaining Effup on November 3rd, 2009