ANSWERS: 4
-
OK I'll not troll..Though I am good at it. I think we're really going to have to wait and see. Yes, it is in the bill, but there's still debates and changes coming to that bill and so, it's about 2-3 YEARS before we'll even begin to feel any impact from it. If it offers the same benefits as a basic care plan, then I'm not against it, but again, this remains to be seen.Do you realize, bills are passed without being read by the senate/congress and such?
-
Public option would be ok. But we cannot trust the gov. they all prove this over and over again on both sides of the aisle. -- There should be no fines. and no taxes. If you do not have ins. And now there is even talk of taxing you if you have ins. You can not trust these people. They will mess it up as they do everything else.
-
Well I must guess that all those big insurance buildings weren't paid for by charitable donations. I am genuinely concerned that the debate is being driven by scare tactics by people who are motivated by greed. I would love to hear more actual debate of the pros and cons of the option and less talk about death panels and fathers who have to sell their kidneys to provide medicine for their children. I personally am more in favor of a one payor system. By that I mean a common method of insurance processing. I think there is a lot of waste created by the need to keep large staffs of people to just process the myriad of different claim forms. That was part of what HIPPA is about. Making the electronic interchange of data more uniform. Something like that with the claim process would be a great benefit to the system and make providing health insurance cheaper thereby making it more affordable for everyone.
-
I cautiously support it. Supposedly competition is good for businesses. The "invisible hand of the market" and all that. However, as always, the devil is in the details, and I would want to read a proposal before unreservedly supporting or opposing it.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 