(This is an open question to anyone of any faith) How can you disclaim evolution when there is so much evidence backing it up?
by 
MRABSOLUTE
ANSWERS: 7
-
That's what faith is, the belief is something higher there can be both.
-
I don't, given enough time everthing evolves It doesn't discount a creator/God/Alien race seeding the human species, because it has evolved over the millenia
-
Most of the evidence for evolution can be explained by a Creator using a common plan for the workings of the organisms He created. So there are more similarities between horses and cows than horses and frogs. Still, horses and frogs use many of the same biochemical pathways on the cellular level. What can the "so much evidence backing it up" tell us about the evolution of new species. How does the common ancestor of chimps and humans evolve along one line to chimps and another pathway to humans? Where does the new genetic information needed for a more complex organism come from?
-
Because most of that evidence is theoretical evidence, not truly proved as "evidence" You might say a horse and a frog have many genes or we in common, I say if I were God and that gene worked really well for that organism, and would work well for another organism I have yet to create, why not use that gene?
-
Or, so you've heard. If I told you that there was circumstantial evidence that suspect A killed a person. However, it has been shown that he was not even in the country, would you conclude he was guilty? Likewise, some believe that there is evidence of biological evolution. However, the basic mechanism of mutation has been shown to not be able to produce new kinds of creatures, rather only very similar species. Thus making biological evolution impossible and any supposed evidence misunderstood. However, many have faith that, given enough time, mutations could accomplish much more. But, it would have had to mutate the first single living cell (and how did that happen?) into 100 million species with billions of extremely complex subsystems. Mutation has not shown that it does not have anywhere near the ability to do all of that.
-
I don't see that one cancels out the other, but rather that they work in tandem. Without evolving, everything that was created would die. What would be the point of creation in the first place then? +5
-
..
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC