I don`t beleive there should be.Not anyone elses business.

Well, you posted the question on here for people to answer, so I am going to answer you. This is YOUR world. World of people wanting to do their own thing. Good for you! I look forward to a new world without wickedness and things. To get there though, I must live by certain guidelines. Therefore, I CHOOSE to miss out on any lifestyle choices or things related to absolute freedom (so-called) by living by those guidelines. The marriage arrangement was started in the Bible with Eve being brought to Adam. So if you don't want to know that the Bible is true, then there is nothing stopping you from your choice. Still, if it is true, then the law of marriage must be adhered to. The certification of marriage is a relatively new thing in comparison, but scripturally, it tells us that we must "Obey the superior authorities", namely the law-givers. Now when they differ with God's authorities, I choose to stick to God's authority. Now that hope is open to you and to me, if we want it at least. What I am saying, is that in this system, yes, it is fine for you to marry in a same sex relationship. But scripturally, it is not. So do as you please mate. Doesnt affect me. It shouldnt bother you either, as it doesnt bother me what you do. Why should it bother you what I think? Cheers.

you are free to marry anyone!!!!! there's no policy for all these things !!!! its all up to you with whom you want to marry and all

As a lesbian, I keep trying to see this issue from all sides, not just my own that wants desperately to be able to marry my partner. And here's the conclusion I've come to... There are two side to the marriage debate: Civil, and religious. To me, I want all the same civil rights as anyone else. The spiritual or religious side of the marriage ceremony could remain as diverse as it is today. That being, some religions will not perform marriage ceremonies for two people of the same sex, and some religions or churches will. This way, folks who subscribe to a particular religious faith do not have to acknowledge, agree with, or perform the spiritual side of marriage and can still maintain their faith identity, while other religions that are more open can. I think this sort of solution might be a best fit for most.

Marriage is not a human right. to live is a human right, not to be tortured is a human right but not marriage. Or did you ever hear of a single how went to curt because he's got no wife?? Marriage is something between a man and a woman.

The decision leans towards what is 'natural'.

Marriage is not some sort of right or privilege, but rather something sacred. Most seem to have lost that view. Part of its sacredness is from the fact that a man and a woman love each other, and the children they have through marriage are a result of that love. Homosexual "marriage" loses the sacredness of marriage completely.

Marriage is not a Human right! it is a man made or god made institution.