by 
sleidman
ANSWERS: 9
-
No they shouldn't.
-
i think so,, man for woman and woman for man
-
They should just move if the people there don't like them that much, I wouldn't want to live in a place that hates me for who I love to make a law against it
-
Absolutely not. This week, CA's Attorney General stated that he will not support nor defend the "unconstitutional" removal of state-given marriage legal rights that Prop 8 represents. He specifically mentioned that LGBT marriages do NOT have to be changed or annulled until court rulings in 2009 on the legality of the proposition, if ever.
-
No they shouldn't. No one should be able to force a couple to divorce, but then, no one should be able to stop a couple from marrying in the first place. As to marriage being a religious rite, what a lot of rubbish, a marriage is a union of two things, those things might be a man and woman, a man and man or two companies. I do not even recall a place in the bible that says a man and woman must enter a church and be married by a minister, only that once they sleep together they are joined for life. Do I feel that all churches should perform marriage services for gay couples? No, like any club they have a right to set their rules, but they don't have a right to push their rules on the rest of society.
-
A divorce is not needed when a civil act is nullified by the civil authority.
-
Nope. The marriages should remain legal and fully reconized.
-
no they should not and from what i learned they can't be forced to get a divorce either, seeing as their marriage was legally recognized at the time of the union.
-
i guess your all gays, happy analsex
desotapop RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC