- NEW!
by Randoley on October 5th, 2009
I don't think the terrorists are that stupid. I don't think any country or group is that stupid. It would be their death sentence.
What is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?
by mikedsign on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What do you think of the iPhone that instead of giving directions for abortion clinics send users to religious pregnancy crisis centres?
by Ombliss22 on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is the difference between terrorists and patriots?
by mikedsign on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
It's not enough just to be alleged to be a terrorist That's part of what due process is deciding are you a terrorist? Agree/disagree Why
by Wynper on December 5th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Gen John Allen: 60 minutes interview: "We're actually going to be here (in Afghanistan) for a long time." Your opinions ?
by Rufus on October 18th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading If (when) a terrorist group uses nukes to hit 2 or 3 or 4 major US cities, then presents us with the ultimatum to withdraw from the Middle East and cut off aid to Israel, what alternative is there to complying?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Honestly, they don't care about dying, or at least the planners would find people who wouldn't care about dying.
by Amorphous Blob on October 5th, 2009
But they care about forcing the world to be Muslim. they can't do that when they are all turned to glass.
by Randoley on October 5th, 2009
They expected 9/11 to bring the US to its knees, misunderstanding both the US economy and character. I think it's more likely that the US *wouldn't* nuke Islamabad if some Pakistani terrorists, whereabouts unknown after the attack, were the source of the weapon. The US also wouldn't nuke Saudi Arabia or other parts of the Muslim world, so at most, IMO, it'd be a few tactical nukes on places that are estimated to be very likely to be places the terrorists are.
by Amorphous Blob on October 5th, 2009
I we gave the leaders of these countries one week to produce the culprits or we retaliate with utter annihilation. They would give them up, and you they know who the terrorists are.
by Randoley on October 5th, 2009
They'd waffle and give up a few small fry at most, or, more likely, refuse and give excuses and trust in their god.
by Amorphous Blob on October 6th, 2009
then, BOOM!
by Randoley on October 6th, 2009
That'd kill millions and probably cause a revolution to install an Islamist shadow gov't who wouldn't hesitate to nuke us again. Plus the Arab world would immediately embargo oil for our "attacks on Islam", sending us into a depression.
I don't know what the least-worst answer would be.
by Amorphous Blob on October 6th, 2009