No! Do you??!!
Proof:
EVOLUTION??
I guess that for myself, I do not just Believe it NOT to be true, I have literally PROVEN that it is NOT - Scientifically!
There are 2 "animals" that specifically and comprehensively disprove evolutionary theory beyond all doubt:
Snake & Man.
WHY THEM?? … and … HOW?? you may ask.
They are Precise opposites in everything - both behaviourally and anatomically!!
As a Specialist Anatomist and Kinesiologist, I undertook a comparative study over nearly 10 years, discovering, then proving, this great, yet simple, phenomenon
‘WHY DO YOU SAY THEY ARE OPPOSITE??’ you may ask.
You may also query, "Well, if they are precise opposites, Why do they both have backbones and breathe air, and have many other apparently similar internal organs?”
In answering this, it needs to be both - recognized and acknowledged that "kinds" of organism [or species] cannot simply defy the Higher overall laws of nature itself, simply to accent a differentiation of species.
That is the number 1 rule of comparative science.
What I am saying here is that because of their size, and land-dwelling nature, etc., they are necessarily Both vertebrate, and require some similarity in alimentary system, etc., simply to live efficiently and to satisfy the requirements of effective survival according to their overall land-dwelling nature.
(Most specifically, I speak particularly of venomous ground snakes in this study.)
There, after satisfying the fundamental laws of survival nature and of effective and satisfactory existence itself, their 'similarities' completely end!
Thereafter, they are total opposites in everything – in terms of all possible differentiating factors among the beasts that exist.
In fact, a very close examination will reveal that snakes cannot be more unlike other beasts, either, if they tried! For that matter, neither could Man be more different than everything else!! ... and that is, despite all the claims of genetics, etc., that various species [of ape, etc.] possess 99% similarity with the DNA of Man. Despite all this supposed similarity, there is nothing that really well compares to Man at all among the beasts that exist - especially, behaviourally.
Now this extraordinary discovery of total opposites tends to disprove random chance mutation – per evolutionary theory.
It also confirms a deliberation in Creation – it tends to most powerfully support that there is a God in nature – determining the nature of matters and designing them, according to His own purposes.
Similarly, it also powerfully supports the Biblical account of Adam and Eve, wherein it was the very serpent, itself, in fact, which was used by Satan to oppose God to Eve.
As you may recall, as a result of this act by the serpent, God cursed all things – changing them – but none so greatly as the snake!! [See Holy Bible]
Obviously, as this study shows, among all the changes that were made was the symbolic representation re the snake that epitomized this very act – its Opposition to Man and God!! … especially so, when we consider, as well, that that same record declares that Man was created in the express image of God. This acknowledgment makes the whole proposal of expressed symbolic opposition between Man and snake all the more significant, given the Biblical history.
A Master Achievement re early Biblical Proofs … would you not think??
God, only, can be thanked for it, under His direction, guidance and revelation! ALL His acts and inspiration are Masterly – hence, His name: “The Master”.
OBJECTION BY ANOTHER ANSWERER RE MY DISCOVERY:
You don't appear to understand the math involved in evolution or genetics. We may have 99% similar DNA to a Chimpanzee, but we also have 80% similar DNA to a banana.
MY RESPONSE:
denidowi May, 11 2008 at 05:10 AM [Edit]
Well, really, I DO believe I understand the maths in genetics!
As a mathematician myself, what you're saying is precisely what I am saying. The whole concept of opposites is purely mathematical.
The claims by geneticists that we all (Man and Beast, more particularly) spring from the same evolutionary derivatives/tree/chain simply because our DNA's are so alike - especially, chimps and humans being so close is my particular point - is precisely why I say that that % DNA similarity does not make us similar or of the same background – especially when you consider the considerably close % of the banana – at 80% sameness. Despite the DNA similarity, the point is that this DNA similarity has to actually evidence properly in nature – Both, behaviourally and anatomically. Bananas?? I don’t think so!
The similarity re DNA merely proves that ALL life has to have certain characteristics and similarity of feature simply in order to simply satisfactorily survive alive in nature – so that it exists efficiently. After all, God is a God of law and order.
Snakes and Man, therefore, share DNA similarities, so does the banana, but only so far as to make them live effectively in nature.
There, the similarity totally ends!
Specie-wise, Man and snake are precise Opposites – even among their similar survival features – lung/s, heart, mouth, alimentary canal, etc. – there is great opposition between the two.
LET’S JUST SIT BACK AND ENJOY A BRIEF LIST RE OPPOSITION BETWEEN MAN AND SNAKE FROM THE BOOK, “TWO BIRDS … ONE STONE!!” (Denis Towers)
SNAKES VS MAN:
Horizontal flat ambulation vs upright, vertical.
Lies flat along the ground vs. stands erect
Indented penis (lies pushed into the inside of the body when ‘flaccid’) vs external in Man
Forked divergent tongue vs convergent [narrowing]
While on the tongue: no apparent taste buds vs Yes….
Tongue: Much external time vs mostly within mouth
Flattened head vs domed high skull
No appendages vs greatest appendicular/axial skeletal ratio of all vertebrates
In rest: human - supine, straight, or zig-zagged position vs coiled, etc
In movement: snake – zig-zagged, random vs direct, deliberate
Ears? Has none vs …
External nose? Has none vs …
Vocalization? Has none – is a ‘hiss & a byword’ vs…
Eyes? Venomous groundsnakes: mainly monocular vs binocular
Food & living practices? Nocturnal vs diurnal
Hibernates & seasonal vs all year around performer…
Dormant hidden lifestyle vs active [!], healthy[!] open
Almost still sex copulation for hours vs acceleratory [in health & vitality]
Eyes covered-hidden by own skin [that is, internal, weak] vs momentary eyelid, direct contact with external…
Audio: internal & almost non-existent vs eternal entry – prime means of communication
Smell: internal, powerful vs external [weak, by comparison with beasts, generally]
Touch: thick scaly skin - insensitive vs great sensitivity…
TASTE?? Apparently, non-existent vs opposite…
Multi-coloured vs…uniformity
Also tremendous variation in size [6” – 30’] vs…comparative uniformity [in health]
Copulating penis? Hooked & downward pointing vs. upward & erect, etc.
Only erectile structure/s [fangs] initiate death vs only erectile structure in Man initiates life
2 peni vs singular penis
Mainly [deadly groundsnakes, that is] oviparous vs viviparous birth to young
Consumption? All in 1 great gulp vs boundless chewing & into small pieces
Head 1st consumption of victim vs. rarely eat heads
Retractible, curved, sharp teeth, pulling long-ways vs fixed, non-curved, mostly molar teeth, which effect direct up & down crushing effect on food
Food totally meat – eaten alive vs mainly ‘picked’ and cleaned fruit & veges, etc. meat is killed, prepared and cooked.
(Note that even among other carnivorous beasts, most include some vegetation)
And the hits just keep on coming between the opposition of Man & snake!!
VESTIGIAL APPARATI: Some snakes have miniscule, Internal, unobservable pelvises.
In typical opposition, a man’s (woman’s in particular) is more outwardly obvious, and forms part of the system of the leg.
In similar opposite manner, snakes possess outwardly-displayed, tails; Man’s is vestigially ‘buried’ in nature:
I almost quite forgot, MvL, thanks for your inadvertent extra point for my cause (He was actually trying to introduce a point for the opposition camp), concerning snakes being opposite Man: re the “Vestigial structures” you point out; I hadn’t thought of it previously. So, Very good ... very good for my cause:
Yes; I must admit, I originally pointed out in my ‘work’ that in Opposition to snakes, humans have no tail - and certainly, in outwardly visual terms, this is so.
However, I'm glad you highlighted these structures vestigially.
You'll note, accordingly [that is, in terms of ‘Opposition between Man and snake’], that the vestigial structures of the snake - its pelvic - lie laterally across its body, whereas, in complete opposition, Man's – his vestigial tail bone – lies vertically, along his longitudinal plane.
So, Good point, MvL ... Good inadvertent point for my cause!
Further [Behavioural consideration re your observation now]:
Man's vestigial apparatus here, assists his "REST" Mode in life – that is, sitting.
Snake, in the true Opposition that he seems to epitomize across every feature, uses his vestigial apparati for active purposes – balance in movement and assistance in the sexual act. As most simply curl or coil up in rest, his miniscule pelvis is obviously, not needed for his rest periods!
SO ONCE AGAIN, IN DECISIVE MANNER, THE SNAKE HAS PROVEN HIMSELF QUITE OPPOSITE MAN IN ALL THINGS!
Good ol’ MvL, God bless him, then proposed that he could also prove that pigeons or dogs were also ‘opposite humans’.
I responded in the following manner:
You are right, MvL. One thing I learned from all my 9 year research into this matter is that animals are quite unlike humans - if not, opposite humans in so many aspects themselves!
In like manner (re my hypothesis), however, snakes appear to be even more unlike anything else that exists on earth than even humans do!! ... including their [supposed] ‘nearest cousins’ (lizards), if you really study them very closely, that is. They are at considerable variation with one another.
Whereas, if you made a comparative study of the oppositeness of feature between [say] a cow and a bird, or a snail and a dog, you would not access nearly as many opposites by comparison.
Perhaps, somewhat surprising, but true nonetheless!
For further clarification, you might try the Book, mentioned above.
JUST A SPAT RE A FEW MORE OPPOSITES BETWEEN MAN AND SNAKE:
Ratio of Brain size to mouth: extremely low – only a fraction vs. most pronounced of all known creatures [a case of mind over matter, I believe]
Sheds its ‘skin’ in 1 whole piece vs. in opposition, not so
Snake sleeps with open eyes vs. shut-eye
Arrangement of internal organs: Mostly in single file vs. paired
Accordingly, lives mostly alone vs. in pairs/families
Desserts its young even before birth [eggs] vs. constant nurture and parental nourishment
Cold-blooded vs. warm…
Head in dirt vs. head nearest the heavens, etc.
Here, you have but a mini-list of the all-encompassing complete opposition: Man vs. snake!
May God Bless You
PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS SIMPLE YET ASTOUNDING DISCOVERY WORLDWIDE!
Comments
So let me get this straight: you think humans are more different from snakes than they are from, say, tarantulas or mushrooms or bananas? And that's how you disprove evolution?
That's very ... umm ... interesting. (He says, backing slowly away.)
by Cirbryn on November 4th, 2008
Yeah!
by denidowi on November 5th, 2008
HO-LY-CRAP!!! That was freaking awesome! I've seen some stupidity here on AB, but this takes the cake. You actually gave support FOR evolution and claimed it to be support for CREATION.
A snake with no legs has a pelvis, therefore evolution is false.
You just made my day!
by MrJosh on June 28th, 2010