ANSWERS: 31
-
Well, this is just me, but no. Gotta have my woman.
-
Men wouldn't even be here without women. Adam is the only exception to the rule.
-
Gay men do all the time.
-
Some can, yes.
-
i am sure men can live without us as much as we can with out them, but i sure like having one around at times.
-
I've been doing it for years now!
-
biolgical we need each other to reproduce yada yada yada. but we don't neeeeed to reproduce now do we... we're being over populated in some parts.
-
If every man lived without a woman, the human population would die off.
-
Sure, they can. Many gays can do.
-
Not well
-
i personally would go insane, females have qualities men dont that you need to be around from time to time to take a break from the guy talk.
-
Yes, we can. But it's a lot less fun....;-D.... . . .
-
this is a mans world, but it wouldnt be nothing, without a woman or a girl.
-
It is possible, and many men do, but in general, they choose not to. If you mean all men, forever, it would only last as long as the men currently alive die off, and that would be the end of men. Women could continue well beyond that point, as they can conceive and bear children with any men involved.
-
i dont think so becuz without a woman [birth] a man couldn't be brought into the world [only exception is adam]
-
technically no, no women means the human race slowly dies out..but women can live without men thanks to advancements in science... but..no i dont think we could there would be 10x more fighting and war :s
-
YES THEY CAN! There is artificial wombs if you're talking a reproductive way. And in a normal way especially, men waste so much time and money on women every year when they could be using that for other more important things. Women are just an obstacle.
-
well i herd women can produce asexually or anything female but im not shure about males
-
No because they can't shoot them.
-
Theoretically: 1 woman + 1 man = 10 children. 1 woman + 10 men = 10 children and continuous fights. 10 women + 1 man = 100 children In reality, I think it is hard to impossible for a man to force himself to have intercourse with a desperate and unattractive woman. So the last scenario will not yield 100 children. But I still think that, biologically, women are more important to the survival of the specie. "Psychiatric Problems. In 1988, a study of preschool children admitted to New Orleans hospitals as psychiatric patients over a 34-month period found that nearly 80 percent came from fatherless homes." Socially, men are important for the survival of society as we know it. It is unknown how men would behave in a society such as the one that I described in last second scenario.
-
I don't think so. My wife offers me more support, encouragment, and love than anyone I've ever met. And, I don't think that I would be the person I am today without her.
-
Not as long as they can without us.
-
"And in a normal way especially, men waste so much time and money on women every year when they could be using that for other more important things. Women are just an obstacle." It kills me that women dont understand that they are a mans reason to live... A world where everything is about sports and racing and all that... how depressing would that be.
-
No, woman was made for man.
-
Not if they don't have porn either... But women are ones in porn... Oh, that would suck! ;D
-
I don't think we can live without each other.
-
No, or we'll go into a healthclub and kill random women apparently.
-
OK you got a point thought, there are more important things. I didnt grew up dreaming about women, I had other dreams.
-
No. We know it. Women know it. Women know we know it. Men know that women know it. No. man cannot live without women and vice versa.
-
nope But I could
-
Yeah but what's the point?
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC