The Great Depression
 
Question:
Avatar

Would the Herbert Hoover Administration's laissez-faire policies have ended the Great Depression without war, if given a chance? In shorter time?

By Friendo Asked Sep 4 2008 10:31PM
16
Pts
 
 
Rate Question
Answer Question Help someone!
Get the latest questions in The Great Depression
flag

Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sign up now to ask a question or help someone else by giving an answer!

signup now
 

First Answer

by Scott D - ex-QnA on Sep 5, 2008 at 12:06 am Permalink

Avatar
From what sort of revisional history textbook did you get that notion?

Those were Mellon's ideas, not Hoover's.

The general consensus among historians is that Hoover's defeat in the 1932 election was caused primarily by failure to end the Depression, compounded by opposition to Prohibition. The accelerant was the insanity of increasing taxes at a time when taxes should have been reduced. The ensuing conflagration spread across the globe. Smooth-Hawley and the ensuing trade wars only complicated matters.

Hoover's other electoral liabilities were his overpowering lack of charisma and his incredibly poor political skills. He was his own worst enemy.

Then along came FDR and his collectivist plans which actually PROLONGED the Great Depression. World War II was actually FDR's saving grace, in a matter of speaking.


Learn more here ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hoover
0
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments
Avatar Friendo Sep, 05 2008 at 12:34 AM
Lose the attitude, Scott.
It's a neutral enough question. I asked about "Hoover's Administration" for a reason. I'm well aware of Hoover's history. And Mellon the banker. It was the Wikipedia article that you've cited that prompted me to ask the question in the first place. I just wanted to see if there were any die-hard trickle-down Reaganites still out there that believe a laissez-faire government would be effective in a depression economy if given a chance. In your last two lines you finally gave me an opinion. Thank you.
Avatar Scott D - ex-QnA Oct, 05 2008 at 01:44 AM
I cop an attitude because of the incredible volume of revisional textbooks that pass for "knowledge" for much of the past half century.
Free markets MUST be allowed to correct themselves -- by themselves. The fact remains that we cannot legislate our way out of a economic recession, financial panic, or depression. Government manipulation of markets has ALWAYS led us into greater dependence on more government, which leads to only more grief and oppression.
If America fails to learn from the colossal failures of FDR's New Deal, then we truly deserve an even more horrific outcome than a mere ten year depression and yet another World War. We may not be as fortunate ... this time.
Less government intervention and lower taxation would have dramatically foreshortened the Great Depression, although nothing would have avoided our involvement in WWII.
Oh, and please thank the cowardly drive-by down-rater for me, would ya? ;-)


Add an Answer

Would the Herbert Hoover Administration's laissez-faire policies have ended the Great Depression without war, if given a chance? In shorter time?

How to write a good answer
Your answer:

Display answer in fixed-width font (good for tables or text diagrams)

Answers must adhere to our Terms of Use

To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. Use the Preview button at the bottom to verify.

You can edit your answer at any time.

Add Video Add Iimage


Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.