Is it not harder to believe the universe came from nothing than it is to believe it has always existed?
by 
-O-uknow
ANSWERS: 4
-
For me, it is easier for me to understand that I am a temporal being in an a temporal universe than for me to believe that everything that exists from mere chance and collisions between atoms.
-
No, it doesn't make sense to believe that the universe has always existed. Research by NASA and various space agencies around the world has shown that the universe is indeed "growing", or "projecting outward". If something if projecting outward, that means it came from an original point - but if the universe has always existed, than that original point would be, a loop - like a computer program that keeps restarting. May have made sense in "The Matrix", but not in reality.
-
No. All of the scientific evidence points to a Big Bang beginning to the universe. The Steady State model was disproved decades ago. Eric Lerner not withstanding.
-
I dont think that question should really be answered by science but more so with your own personal philosiphy. If the universe did at one point just begin, that still makes little sense. I do not believe that all comsic contiousness and everything that is just happened to blow out of some small spec. To me that is still extremely vague. I see it as making more sense by always existing. There could have been some kind of big bang, but that wasnt the start to the universe. I mean there was a universe inside of that spec before the big bang. There is a cycle for everything and I believe no end. It is just a dream.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC