I wish no one would have them..including America! Find it amazing we did not learn anything from Hiroshima!

The nature of nuclear weapons are such that whoever has them already has a vested interest in preventing anyone else from obtaining them. I recommend turning Iran into a glass parking lot.

It is all about survival of the fittest. To me it is not about right or wrong. It is about staying the big dog in the fight. We have them but we don't want anybody else to. It's just the way it is.

The movement for disarmament has varied from nation to nation over times. A few prominent proponents of disarmament argued in the earliest days of the Cold War that the creation of an international watchdog organization could be used to enforce a ban against the creation of nuclear weapons. This initial movement largely failed. During the 1960s, a much stronger popular movement against nuclear weapons developed, rallying primarily around the fear of nuclear fallout from nuclear testing. After the Partial Test Ban Treaty (1963), which prohibited atmospheric testing, the movement against nuclear weapons somewhat subsided in the 1970s (and was replaced in part by a movement against nuclear power). In the 1980s, a popular movement for nuclear disarmament again gained strength in the light of the weapons build-up and rhetoric of President Ronald Reagan. After the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, however, the momentum would again fade. Eleven treaties have been signed, but have always been bilateral and never included all the countries that had nuclear weapons. If all countries would have signed the Kyoto Protocol a great advance for a Nuclear Ban Protocol could have been achieved but unfortunately some countries did not sign it. The above is the correct answer to your question and no one should have them but Iran and North Korea will not sign a treaty thus the United States will not sign either in order to protect itself. Regards.