Absolutely nothing. It is barbaric and totally unnecessary unless there is a physical problem. Anyone who injures their child in this was, in my opinion should be prosecuted for causing grievous bodily harm. Sorry if this offends anyone.

well it will defiatly help with their sex life if your in america, he wont remember it, and foreskin can get infected if not properly washed. almost all the girls i know dont even know what an un circumsized penis looks like.

You won't hear a word from me. It's totally unnecessary! Edit: Most all the men and boys in my family have never had it done and they are all happy and normal, never had an infection problem or have said they were ridiculed by women for it. I think that's a none issue. If a woman loves you what's the difference? And there is even the research showing that you can have a happier sex life with a foreskin than without. They are cutting off the most sensitive part of the penis. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/06/070627144210.htm To do it just because of lessening the risk of one disease doesn't make sense to me. I can see if you are Jewish, that it would make sense.

"I hear babies that aren't circumcised run the risk of having their genitals explode when they're older." That's BS of course but you didn't say convincing required honesty ;)

That is your own choice and I hope you make up your mind along with your bf whether to do this or not. Sometimes it's a religious reason other times parents just want their kids to be like their father are so it's easier to explain to their children. Others do it so their kids don't get made fun of, some do it because sometimes it can cause medical issues and infections. These are all good reasons and should be thought about greatly. It is ultimatily you and your bf choice and you should weigh the options and take all into account. I am not saying you should or shouldn't, but make sure you know why you are or not and think about future situations also, which would be better for him. A while back they used to think that if you weren't circumsized it could cause cancer in the genitals. I don't know what ever came of this, I do know that my uncle wasn't and now he doesn't have a penis. I have no idea if it is related, I have no intention of asking either. I am looking for some good sites for you to study up on. BTW they used to say it didn't hurt the babies, but now they give them meds and pain reliever when they do it, so they have found out that it isn't a walk in the park. I read a thread saying a kid had it done when he was 12 and made up his own mind. He is happier now, but it's more painful and harder to do when you are older. If I find any good sites I will post them. Good luck!

Absolutely nothing! Don't alter Mother Nature...

My father was circumsised when he was sixteen..he says it was so painful. I had both my boys circumsised just because I didn't want the risk of infection, and they are boys so one less thing to worry about! I don't think its barberic its an extra piece of skin, is there a purpose for it maybe in the womb, not really sure. Its your choice though..Have you talked to your doctor about it?

I am personally anti circ. I watched one done and that was enough for me. Most men I know are "uncut" and have had no problems. I have actually met men that have skin put back on. I figure it this way, If there is a problem later on it is easier to remove the skin then put it back and if my son wants to have it done when hes older than so be it. I dont want to make that decision for him. The thing that urks me to death is all the women that say they will circ their sons because uncut penises look yucky! Talk about shallow, superficial, morons. They all look the same erect.

Nothing at all. It is completely unneccessary, and the arguments about hygiene are simply not true. (everything can be moved, can't it? There is no need to cut anything off. BTW, I also think cutting dog's ears as with boxers is stupid and barbaric).

It is very risky for a baby as the skin is too small to hold. Its better to wait until your son is about 10 years old.Circumcision is good as you will have lesser to clean.

at the newborn stage the nerves have not fully formed so the pain is minamal, around 6 months that changes - more of a personal hygiene issue anyway

He'll be the only guy in the showers with an elephant's trunk.

Well let's see. It's impossible to get and stay clean. It always smells like sweat. It's a huge surprise when it's pulled out (for the girl). It's extremely more painful to have it done later in life. And last but not least turtle necks are out of fashion.

Not your penis, not your choice. Let it be his decision when he is older. Watch a video on it and you will want it to be made illegal. I work in the ER, and have never heard such a blood curtling scream as that of a baby being circumcised.

it is hygenicaly better for the boy but if you teach him to clean well there shouln't be a problem. personally i say that is a part of your child and if they get older and don't like it it will be their choice to get it done. you can always get rid of it but can never get it back.

It's your own personal beliefs. Really pay attention to how you feel wout it being altered by those around you. Then talk with your fiance and your doctor, weigh all your options, and make the dicision when your miracle is born. Through it all, don't forget how YOU feel.

I think you should wait until the baby becomes 8-10 years old before he can be circumcized. By these age your son will understand why it is necessary hygienically. Although it is painful especially during the healing period.

It doesn't hurt...? at least I don't remember it hurting...! ;-)

I have one word for you: smegma. But really, it's your decision either way.

Your son will appreciate it, and there is no way he will grow up and wish he was not circumcised. Also why keep a useless piece of skin attached to your body. If there is even one positive thing that can come from removing it, then do it, no need in the world to keep it on. And he will be self conscious about it, and no girl wants to see that, smell that or touch that in any way, trust me, i know this!

I have nothing to say to convince you. It's all up to you. Either way is fine.

You shouldn't try to circumcise girls of course. Assuming it is a boy, you could do worse than circumcision, in that it has proven to be healthy, for the Jews did it not only because of ceremonial law, but because of the fact that the Levites were meticulous about health and sanitation. Circumcision is a sanitary and healthy thing to do.

No one should convince you. Listen to your pediatrician, read the literature, and there are some good comments here. Your baby will not be a baby forever, but will grow up and become an active part of society. Think of the future if you can, and factor that into your decision. Assuming your husband or significant other is involved, his vote counts--he has or has not, undergone the same procedure. Won't be long now!!!

I would say that it's not your penis to mutilate. There are advantages and disadvantages to being both circumcised and uncircumcised. It seems to me it ought to be your son's decision to make in consultation with his doctor when he's old enough to do so.

It’s medically unnecessary, doing it for health benefits make absolutely no sense. You find much better health stats in Scandanavian and other European countries, where they have never circumcised, when compared to the US which is still circumcising. The UK was the first western country to introduce it for medical benefits , and they completely dropped it from their NHS in 1949. A good website with info … http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealth/facts/circumcision.htm

Women (even pro-circ supporters) understand that “My body MY choice” means the rights of the individual come first. It seems very hypocritical for them to support another persons rights and deny their own children that very same right. The choice is still legally yours, the morality of it you must deal with yourself. Research both sides of the issue , then make the best choice you can. Here are two parenting sites … for parents raising circ’d and intact children, at the intact site you will find intact families, and mixed families , that may have a circ’d one child and then after doing research , they chose to stop doing this to any more children. At the Circ support site it is only allowed to talk if you say something good about circumcision, otherwise you will be warned/banned… Intact Support… http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-ppwithforesk Circ support … http://messageboards.ivillage.com/n/mb/listsf.asp?webtag=iv-ppnoforeskin&nav=start&prettyurl=%2Fiv%2Dppnoforeskin

Chuck Norris did it.

I can't and won't. I will tell you my personal decision with our son: I was for it, my wife against it. After doing a LOT of research, I discovered there was really NO reason, medical or religious, to support my desire. I was circumcised as a baby, therefore that was what I wanted for our son. The ultimate decision for us was NOT to circumcise. Do the research on your own and make your own decision. I cannot help you any more than that.

I say shalom and mazel tov.

CIRCUMSISION! - im circumsized. - i think uncircumsized dicks are gross and so do most women - i am very glad to have been circumsized as a baby because if I wasnt ... it would hurt like a bitch to get it now (and i would) there you go, dont listen to the other people. poor babies would blame their parents and hate that ugly thing on the crotch that looks like a chinese egg role. And also, if your read the bible, god saaid to someone that he and all his sons were to be circumsized in the name of god, if they truely believed in him its a sign of christianty/catholicism

We had our son circumcised simply because my husband is. He didn't want our son to be upset that he didn't look like his dad. My parent's didn't circ any of my brothers for the same reason. My dad isn't and they weren't so they wouldn't wonder why they looked different. We researched a really good and experienced Dr to do the procedure, we were both there for it, and my son was only upset to have his hands restrained for safety. As soon as they gave his hands freedom again, he was happy as could be. He didn't seem to be in pain or upset either before, during, or after the procedure. I would definately reccommend that if you decide to do it, you get a good Dr that you are comfortable with and make sure you can be there. I would not under any circumstances have let them do it without me in the room. I wanted to be able to comfort him if I needed to. I held his hand and that was really all he needed.

If you live in the USA it is the norm if you live in europe it isnt done. now for the myths A uncircumsized dude: Spreads Aids, is dirtyer, stinks, gives the girl cervical cancer, spreads STD's, Penis cancer, etc etc. As far as the STD'd and Aids circed or not if you have risky sex your gona get it. it stinks you have to teack the little dude to pull back and wash just like you do your hair armpits and body you dont wash anything it will stink. You need to teach your little dude how to take a bath pulling it back and washing it up. If the above were true Aids Std cancer would be at a all time high in europe cause most dudes are not circumsized. do not have it done curtdude uncut and happy

There is solid evidence to suggest that lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSeA), a chronic inflammatory disease of the penis, is much more common in uncircumcized males. There is also solid evidence that HPV infection (genital warts) is more common in uncircumcized males. These diseases are both associated with a much higher risk for penile cancer compared with males who do not have these diseases. Rates of penile cancer are clearly lower in the West and among religious groups such as Jews and Muslims, most likely due to high circumcision rates. Penile cancer rates are higher for religious groups such as Hindus, that do not practice circumcision. It should be noted that penile cancer rates are relatively low in all groups compared with other cancers, but that they are clearly higher for uncircumcized males. Late circumcisions, i.e. after HPV infection or a diagnosis of LSeA have NOT proven to be therapeutically beneficial. Circumcisions are very low risk procedures, however there is a slight risk (less than 1%) of infection, and the child will feel some pain. All in all, I believe the potential benefits far outweigh the risks. Hope it helps!

why? the way the skin slides acts like extra lubricant which if anything might make sex more enjoyable atleast for her. I am my wife's only uncircumsised partner ever and the only one to let her reach climax. she had a BF for years without any enjoyment for herself, I was a virgin and had success by my second try. wether being uncircumsized had anything to do with that I will never prove because I am not going to disfigure Jr.

I would encourage you to leave him alone. Teach him how to use a bar of soap.

women who have sex with men that are uncircumcised run a much higher risk of cancer of the cervix -

Compare the US a circumcising-culture to (their ancestors) cultures that have never circumcised, and those that previously circ’d their children. As soon as you get to European cultures that have never practiced circumcision you will find that all the Beliefs in circ benefits disappear . And you will find resistance to expose their children to unnecessary surgery. And the UK (where circumcision was introduced into the Western World) circ was practiced and then abandoned , they are now highly resistant to the idea of circ having any medical value . Their opinion is now inline with the rest of the world – there is no medical support for routine circumcision. It looks like circumcision only continues in people that have had previous exposure, and when a population abandons this idea , it then becomes highly resistant to the idea of circumcision.

Ok 18 years ago almost to the day we had our first baby boy and we too didnt feel the need to get him circumcised. That changed, we both changed diapers and kept him clean but it was red and sometimes he said it hurt now he was only one but we had to have it done. The Dr. who told us said it serves no purpose and it can be more harmful to leave it then to remove it. You have to think about it like this "the way we did to" we wanted to let him make the decission for himself when he got older. Now sit there and think about this, the boy is 18 getting hooked up with girls at college, they take one look and go a runnin the other way, not to mention the older the boys get the less they want to keep themselves clean not to mention pay extra attention to the foreskin. Yeah to me and my wife it was wrong to do, but both of our sons were done. The up side, if done at birth no big deal, if done later on, thats an acctual surgical procedure that requires anesteshia "a big risk". I say get it done at birth and you wont have an 18 year old saying mom I cant believe how embarrassing this is.

I our family, two uncircumsized young men have had serious issues. The first young man was 12 and had issues with the foreskin constricting around the end of his penis. This made it impossible for him to clean himself and caused severe infection and led to an extremely embarassing and painful, but necessary procedure at the age of 12. The other is only 4. His father and mother have divorced and now mom has been making a lot of bad choices. Her neglect to clean his little area has caused severe infection, which could lead to sterility. His foreskin when pulled back for cleaning will shoot out pus and makes it extremely hard for him to be bathed because he anticipates the agony. Both of my little boys have been circumsized. In my opinion, it is much easier for them to learn to clean themselves and I do not have that fear of tramatising my angels.

i believe circumcision is a good idea mostly because the penis requires more maintainence with the fore-skin for example: 1- if the area that is covered by the forskin is not properly cleansed it can be a reserviour of bacteria and stuff can build up (iv seen it happen) and 2-if for some reason later in life ur child has a catheter inserted into his bladder (the foreskin needs to be retracted to do this) and the foreskin is not properly put back it can cut off blood flow to the penis and cause severe damage :D

its religious.Every man/woman born of a woman must be circumcised.

It's your decision to make. Personally, I am not for circumsision. Both of my boys and three of my brothers are intact and have had no problems with it. We don't remove other body parts that are deemed unnecessary unless there is a good medical reason. I see no need for a child to have an unnecessary, irreversible medical proceedure.

My boyfriend was Circumcised for medical reasons but he says his penis is more tender during sex because of the lack of skin to move. But he also says it looks better and i agree.

My answer may be a sad indication of how society judges and ostracizes people...but once in the teen years he will encounter situations (locker rooms, dating, etc) that will define him as different than the majority. Happened to a friend of mine in junior high...the guys made fun and created cruel nicknames, and the girls weren't any better. He endured alot and said he would never want his kid to go through it.

The fact that, when hes older he may scare girls away, because so many are used to circumcised. He may even fall in love with one who can stand uncircumsised, then he'd have to do it when hes older. *ouch* ps: so much gunk can get stuck under the skin, and it can even lead to infections.

Absolutely nothing. It's none of my business.

to be honest I think that it should be the childs choice on wheather it is done or not. A lot of men have harsh feeling towards there parents for doing it. I would stay with what you think is right

I hate my parents for not having me circumcised. Hygiene can be an issue sometimes. I think the extra skin is a turn off for a lot of women. The key issue is hygiene.

It is said that circumcised boys have less risk of developing cancer of the foreskin when they are older. Also, they have fewer infections and it is easier to clean especially when they are little.

I think this is so much a cultural thing! I'm not gonna say anything to convince you to circumcise your child. I live in a country where circumcision is not a normal thing to do when a boy is born. Most men here (Netherlands) are not circumcised. So, my partner, and the boyfriends I had before him, where all nicely uncut. In the US women might be turned off by this, as they are not used to it and think it's unhygienic. Here it's really different. To be honest, I find a guy with foreskin definitely more attractive. That is a mixed up thing of culture, and just the fact that I really love that soft body part :) The hygiene thing is a myth. Guys in my country are not unhygienic for still having their foreskin. It's all a matter of keeping everything clean, like everyone has to do, men and women. In some cases circumcision is necessary, for instance if the skin is too tight. But in other cases.. there is really no need for it.

When I found out I was having a baby boy I thought many things, one being that he would be circumcised, unlike my husband who is not. Then I did the research and found out that with proper education of the child there isn't much difference and that its a personal choice not a medical one. Then my baby was born and as I held him in my arms for the first time I KNEW I wasn't gonna let ANYONE come after him with a knife unless it was to save his life. He may want a cirsumcision later on in life and I will support him on it but why oh why would you allow your precious new baby to go through that trama unneedlessly? By the Way this is TAPriceCTR's Wife, not him. He didn't get pregnant :) lol this is TAP, I am making her get an account. she scoffed at me for months about this website but when she looked she could not resist speaking. :-)

Also consider that circumcision is a religious thing too.

I'm sure that I could convince you to, but I'd rather let you know that sex is more pleasurable if a man still has their original foreskin attached. Do you want you kid to have more pleasurable sex or would you rather he last longer in bed?

Because you don't want your son's penis to look like it's about to rob a bank.

Hopefully nothing. The American Academy of Pediatrics, in their most recent Circumcision Policy Statement, concluded that 'data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision' and that 'parents should determine what is in the best interest of the child'. With all that is known about the minimal medical benefits and the possible risks of circumcision, whether or not to have your son circumcision should be more of a cultural (ritual circumcision by the Jewish religion and Muslims, etc) than a medical question. A better question would be 'Does my new baby boy need a circumcision?' The answer to that one is much easier. No, he doesn't need a circumcision and it just may kill him! http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/circumcision/PR00040 http://pediatrics.about.com/cs/weeklyquestion/a/022002_ask.htm http://www.expectantmothersguide.com/library/philadelphia/circumcision.htm http://www.nospank.net/fleiss1.htm http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/ http://www.cirp.org/news/dailytelegraph2007-02-16/ http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=+baby+circumcised&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=

being snipped at birth myself, all i can say is why we did it for my son at birth. first, we are not religious. i had two different friends as a teen that weren't cut. no big deal. it is what it is, we all thought. until at different times both guys ended up having the operation in their twenties. they both claimed they wanted to rid themselves of the awkwardness they were experiencing with girls in college. they also looked forward to riding themselves of the additional hygienic maintenance required by foreskin.

I had a tough time deciding wether to get my son done...the winning argument was if his father is then he should be to. Thats probably the first other male he will see, and those parts are awkward enough let alone if they dont look the same, and my son didnt even cry when it was done.

Do you want to be the mother of the next Menendez brothers ? Do you want grandchilren ? Because most women will back out of the situation once it comes to that moment; do to the fact that is very unhealthey & to some women 'wired looking' there for making him feel low about himself.

It's barbaric, don't do it.

The thought of the pain he will have to endure if he has to have it done at an older age and the risk of infections as he goes through life should be enough.

It is more hygenic, elminates problems associated with the foreskin. However, it can leave large scars (uncommon) and desensitise the head during intercourse.

None....you look your little baby boy in the sweet little face.... I couldn't do it!

When he grows up, girls/boys will think it's hot.

it looks fucking gross if he's not

If you ever saw the infection that someone can get if their not you would do it yourself if you had to.

I'm assuming the decision is long since made...this is an old question. However, I'll put in my two cents in case someone else is reading the question. We had decided not to find out the gender of our baby, so we had to consider this even though we ended up with a girl. We had decided to go with circumcision and the reason we'd decided this was ten year old boys. Ten year old boys don't shower. They have an aversion to anything wet besides mud puddles and farm ponds. They are known to turn on the shower and sit on the edge reading comics until the bathroom is steamy and then come out and proclaim themselves clean (even though there is dirt behind their ears you could plow). The anti-circumcision camp says that there is no need to circumsize, just teach your son to retract the foreskin and clean it carefully. Well, no ten year old boy is going to do that. You can't even get them to wash their faces. When they start noticing girls and realize that cologne can't cover everything, they start to shower again. But sometimes that takes ten years. And I didn't want to have to hold a ten year old down to clean an infection out of a body part that a mother shouldn't have to touch at that age.

it's up to you. In my family men are circumsised at 12 years old because it's part of our tradition, to us it's not barbaric, it's part of the manhood process of our culture and beliefs. It's a cliche "no pain, no glory!" If I have a son I'll have him circumcise at the right age. But if ever your son wants one when he becomes a teenager give him the liberty but for now, don't

Don't cut the boy. It is not necessary. It will not smell if he learns to keep it clean. It will be easier and much more pleasure when he learns to masturbate. More and more folks now days are leaving their saons uncut so he will not feel awkward in front of others.

Please not.Its not your penis is it? leave it alone. From my own experience I am very glad I was not cut. I now have a penis that hangs at 4" when soft and my foreskin is never over my glans.When my penis is hard at 7" the foreskin is pulled back about one inch from the rim of the glans. So you can see I needed all the foreskin the Good Lord gave me.

Circumcision does have its benefits. WHO recommends it as a means to prevent HIV. Recently, it has been found to help prevent herpes and HPV. http://thecondomzone.blogspot.com/2009/03/newfound-benefits-of-circumcision.html

Here is a public service announcement (20min) on circumcision, explaining that circumcision is a painful unnecessary procedure. Even Jewish people are changing their views about this practice. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5395565256830319025 - excellent video The video answers many of the questions that people have about circumcision.

Do it if YOU feel that you want to. It has to be your decision. So listen to your intuition. It's usually correct. My husband is uncircumcised, and all the girlfriends of mine I've talked to say that it feels alot better (not that you'd think of that for your son). Just go with your gut...

I would say nothing to promote unnecessary circumcision.

visit www.webmd.com or consult your doctor and they will tell you about how unhealthy that is for your son when he is older especially during potty training time later on. I do recall that it is painful for them but when it heals you will feel a lot better.

...Its better hygien (keeps em from infections)| ...and maybe becuase when he gets older...he might just appreciate it more. Me as a woman, I find a grown man more attractive with a circumsized one... Its not just about being a baby, but also as an adult.

That's his decision to make.

The Mohel says it's a mitzvah! Oy!

please don' do it ,,,it's mutilation of a baby,,, we have no right to do to them,,,,if they want it done it will be their choice later in life,,,,,it's also much nicer for ladies having sex,,,,,if cut to short they look awful, and is uncomfortable for men ,,,,,you should bear in mind would you like things done to you like that ...i think not,,,,

This topic makes for vehement attitudes and arguments. A pretty balanced article can be found in Men's Health magazine at http://www.menshealth.com The title of the article is "Should All Males Be Circumcised?" (web link too long to list here -- do a search.)

By all means have him circumcised. It is preventive medicine. Hygiene is simplified. It looks better. In the USA 90% of male infants are circumcised. And 80% of all men are circumcised. Women prefer circumcised penises. I am circumcised. My boys are too. In fact every boy and man in my extended family is.

Penis mutilation is never the right thing to do for any reason. Those that say it's done for religious reasons are questioning God's "intelligent design" of the human body.

Nothing !!! Wait until he is of age to make a educated decision for him self. He doesn't need to look like his daddy or your daddy.

Because it is time to live in the 21st century. And most women I know think it is gross and not "Clean" looking.

As a Health Educator and Jewish, circumcised man, I actually address circumcision in my book, The Male Thing Explained: Secrets of an Orgasmic Urban Baby Boomer. This is how I end the brief discussion: It was not unusual for circumcised men from many dogmatic persuasions to silently suffer from “foreskin envy” and perhaps, other related hang-ups. Would sex be more pleasurable if I was uncut—if my “pink cobra was hooded”? Ironically, when showering with his peers, an uncircumcised, gentile boy attending school in a Jewish neighborhood stood out like a sore thumb. Differing from the norm could lead to ridicule and/or an array of his own penis-related psychic scars. Men have been accused of having issues with letting down their defenses, of carrying an undefined anger. Could these impulses be linked to the routine of “slicing and dicing,” for “health reasons,” scores of previously unblemished non-Jewish baby boys prior to them leaving the hospital? Inquiring minds want to know.) Circumcised or uncircumcised, humans want to just fit in with their peers. But using the excuse that circumcision is necessary for "health" reasons is bogus. Unless some "penis health" issues arise in a young boy, ultimately, I think men should have the right to do with their member what they want, when they are adult enough to decide for themselves. For more info on the human condition, visit my website: www.MaleThingExplained.com

the only reason is cleanes if the child is one who does not wash well its better can you predict if he will be a clean person once he doesnt want help in the bath

There is absolutely nothing that i could say to make you want to do such a horrible thing to your child. It is cruel and unusual punishment of a child who has done nothing wrong other than being born.

It's way more painful when they're an adult. I have a brother in law who waited until he was 25 or so after complaining about too much pain during sex. Everyone is different though I guess.

Simple, nothing. Totally against it!

GET HIM CIRCUMCISED .... i'm 26 yeaars old i had to get circumcised at 25 because i hurt it having sex, and even before that it was painful because the skin is at attached to the head by a small strip of skin when having sex it would get streched and bleed, alot of times there would be blood in the condom. take it from some one who had the surgery at 25 it was very painful and i had stiches in my penis for a month or 2 it was painful and embarising/humiliating..people who say other wise are idiots who have an opinion but never had to live 25 years uncircumsized

its funner to play with and its easier to keep it clean

BACTERIA

dont do it god made you that way for a reason

That's the ugliest foreskin I've ever seen

I would hope ... NOTHING !! +5

How about this. Some one in my family that is real close to me ... I know wasn't circumsized. Now hes 24 and has never had a g/f cuz im' sure he thinks his shit looks weird! I've seen what one looks like ..if i were a chick .. I'd run just as fast as i do when I see a FUPPA tuna vag.

i would recommend a baby getting circumcised when it is a few days old......i did it......but, a man who does not get it has to maintain more cleanliness down there, because of the foreskin.........

Don't do it. It's not your penis. The complications of circumcision are also kept hush hush. Hundred of babies die each year from complications from circumcision. The families are just paid to keep quiet, or they attribute the death to "infection"... yeah, infection from having your dick cut! There has also recently been a steep rise in antibiotic resistant staph infections due to circumcision. One poor baby in Canada had his penis cut off completely and they "reassigned" his gender to female. He recently committed suicide after a failed sex change back to male. Very sad. The truth is, they just promote it for the money. You pay the doc and then medical companies buy the tissue and turn it into artificial skin graft patches and facial cream. It's just a big industry and they hurt men to line their pockets.

do it....HYIGENE!!!! plus women dont like it..nasty

I am a circumcised guy, but not tons of skin was chopped. I look uncircumcised what soft.... Maybe best of both worlds. The skin is never tight over the head so that nasty smell is not there to give problems or turn off a girl. I still get lots of slide when i masturbate or have intercourse and, although I was not asked my wishes, I am not unhappy with my 'partial' at all. All my bros too and my Dad and uncle got the same cut.