- NEW!
by 911truthseeker on September 20th, 2006
Think about it, two jet airliners crash into two reinforced steel skyscrapers, over half the way up the buildings. The World Trade Center was constructed with interlocking steel grids on all four sides, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY a jet airliner could have caused the office fires that burned in excess of 2000 degrees. Or the straight down collapse of even one tower, let alone two!
Of course those buildings were brought down by demolition explosives! Look to see who has the opportunity, who has the ability, and the resources, and will benefit from it.
So far, since 9/11 our Predident has a free pass to do or say pretty much whatever he wants, in the name of Homeland Security.
Bomb sniffing dogs were pulled from duty at the World Trade Center, by a relative of who: our President. Only 14 fighter jets to protect the entire U.S. on 9/11, because the rest are diverted to other places, supposed training missions. The Mayor of San Francisco gets a phone call telling him not to fly on 9/11, which was traced back to Condoleeza Rice.
Not to mention billions of dollars worth of gold boulion missing from the vault in the WTC basement. Or the recovered hard drives from the WTC showing hundreds of millions of dollars being embezzled on the morning of 9/11. the list goes on and on. Research it for yourself!
by Mr. Knowitall- The Poli Sci Guy on June 17th, 2009
steel may not melt at 1000 degrees which is the temperature jet fuel burns at, but it sure weakens it
by ItsJustDon on September 18th, 2006
I have yet to see any conspiracy theory that holds up under scrutiny. (The WTC 7 claims of demolition, for instance, generally only show pictures from the relatively undamaged side of the building, intentionally leaving the viewer with the false impression that the building was mostly undamaged.) Likewise, the criticisms of the "official" story are also pretty vacuous. (For what it's worth, my personal favorite conspiracy theory is this one: http://media.boredatwork.com/moosechange/ .)
For more information on the debunking of the conspiracy theories, I would recommend both the Popular Mechanics response and the following answers from the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology): http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm .
by Moongrim on June 18th, 2009
The self same government who couldn't get their shit together in invading Iraq competently?
by Hillbilly on June 18th, 2009
It is absurd to think the towers were brought down by demolition.
by O_hare on September 16th, 2006
Right now I don't know what to say. I half believe it was terrorists, and my other half believes it's demolition. All I can say is what really happened on 9/11 might never be solved. All these clues on what really happened is confusing, too much if's and but's and maybe's.
by wilyelder on September 16th, 2006
The twin towers collapsed as a strange sequence for the terrorists. Ordinarily they do not fall straight down like that. It happened just because the planes hit at the spot over 25 percent from the top. The combined weight caused this action.
The pentagon is a different story. They have scores of security cameras there at the pentagon. Not one of them shows us a picture of a jumbo jet coming in to crash. Why? Because there was no jumbo jet crashing. Where did it crash?
Ask the NSA.
by norm on October 9th, 2009
Jetliners, particularly the size of a 747, hold many thousands of gallons of jet fuel, and, at takeoff weight, can weigh nearly one million pounds. Just the weight of the aircraft striking a building would create havoc, not to mention the burning fuel.
OTOH, a light aircraft such as a single engine Cessna would not likely damage a building like WTC. It would likely wind up in the street as a crumpled mess.
by itinary on November 4th, 2009
One thing is for sure. There were some people int he plane with some islamic connections. But hard to believe the government can kill this many people, especially a key location to achieve something.
We didn't achieve anything so far except killing Saddam, which could have been done through an undercover operation anyways.
by Holmeboy on October 13th, 2009
These conspiracy theories are absolute crap.
Why would the US Govt want to kill nearly 3000 of it's own people? Also, even if it did carry out the act, there would have been a leak by now.
I believe the tried and tested FACT that it was a bunch of absolute arseholes doing it for fun (aka Al Qaeda).
by sagie on October 10th, 2009
Barack Obama did it so he could become president, have sex in the White House and win a Nobel Peace Prize.
by TheJoker on October 9th, 2009
The idea that there was some complex far reaching conspiracy is..... well, laughable.
I'm sorry to say that its just because people want there to be more to life, doesnt make it so!!
by MicrocosmicOrbit on October 9th, 2009
The best thing to do is call a fireman of NYFD the NYPD will lie, some firemen that where there that day will tell you about the facts certain types of people like to hide.
by iDeath on June 17th, 2009
It's far more complicated. I don't understand why the planes got as far as they did and were not challengedby jets. I understand the plot that the terrorists had and that the Whitehouse was briefed about them, and I can almost buy incompetence for them not following up on the warning. Tower 7 was demolished by explosives and was not hit by planes. That was done by the property manager. We will never know I guess. I am also alarmed by President Obama's reluctance to investigate the Bush administratyion. His let bygones be bygones attitude is a puzzlement.
by isomcdd2 on November 11th, 2009
black op government entity for sure! if you look at the physics there is no way a jet like that could've taken down those extensive structures, especially looking at the way they collapsed, they started caving in on themselves from the bottom, and isn't it odd that there was a mandatory meeting somewhere else for all the security and bomb squad officers that very same day?
by Anonymous on October 13th, 2009
There is no need for a complex conspiracy theory. What happened, very simply, is that the impact of the aircraft knocked loose the fireproofing material on the buildings' steel structure. The intense heat from the burning jet fuel caused the structural steel to weaken to the point that it could no longer support the buildings' weight. +4
by RC loves ice cream on October 10th, 2009
I certainly don't think the government told us everything. Unfortunately, while conspiracy theorists are usually good at identifying coverups, they're not too good at guessing what the covered-up story is.
I do find it very odd that the planes struck 2 buildings but 3 went down. Actually I found it odd that the 2 towers themselves came down - it did look like a controlled demolition. There have been many planes which crashed into buildings worldwide, and this kind of damage never happened. Is it inconceivable that someone - possibly the terrorists - pre-planted explosives within the towers to make sure they came down?
http://www.google.com.mt/search?q=plane+crash+into+building
by schmee2369 on October 9th, 2009
I just think that it is funny they found traces of...
Nano Thermite.
That shit just doesnt accidentely get places.
So............................................
by Tom on October 9th, 2009
I haven't read all the evidence yet, but the statement made that the towers couldn't have fallen in such a way unless carefully placed explosives were used keeps sticking in my mind. They came down just like one of those Las Vegas implosions.
by MicrocosmicOrbit on October 9th, 2009
If I give my real opinion I will be a target for investigation. So I don't beleive there is freedom anymore. It was something arranged by highly influential people.
When is primary election day?
by Answerbag Staff on February 27th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Instead of abolishing religious freedoms piecemeal, why doesn't Obama follow his communist ideology and just ban it all at once?
by More2Be on February 11th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
what are some good indications that absolute separation of religion and government was not intended in the first amendment?
by Maciw95 on February 9th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Just 1 year in office, Republican Michigan Gov Rick Snyder turns a 1.5 billion deficit into a $130 million surplus. Why can't Obama?
by More2Be on February 11th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Is it really worth trampling upon The Constitution to prop up the régime of B. Hussein Soetoro Obama?
by More2Be on February 12th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading What is your 9/11 theory? Do you support the claims of our government who state the fires from jet fuel brought the towers down? Or do you believe that the towers were brought down by use of demolition explosives installed by black op government entity�
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Like he says...RESEARCH IT FOR YOURSELF!!
by Sunblynd 5.0 on September 20th, 2006
Is sunblynd resorting now to sock puppetry? He could at least have tried to be a bit less obvious about it.
by Anonymous on September 20th, 2006
No,Bob, I'm just another person who can see through the 9/11 governmental B.S. smokescreen, and trying to help others to see through it too.
by 911truthseeker on September 20th, 2006
'No possible way' you say? Evidence? Bomb sniffing dogs weren't needed! Search was for (dead) bodies! Gold bullion found, safe intact and rtd to owners. Yeah, research! It's a good thing, but PLEASE pay attention!
by MyKinKStar on September 21st, 2006
Hey KinKStar, The bomb sniffing dogs I was refering to was PRIOR to 9/11. Also, there were billions of dollars worth of gold boulion in that basement, not just a couple hundred million.
by 911truthseeker on September 22nd, 2006
Not to mention the hard drives recovered from computers at the WTC, showing hundreds of millions of dollars being embezled on the morning of Sept. 11. So, Yeah "PLEASE Pay Attention"....
by 911truthseeker on September 22nd, 2006
Bomb sniffing dogs weren't pulled from the WTC by a relative of the President. That relative of the President had never been involved in day to day security operations, and hadn't been involved in the security company *at all* since the 90s.
by ItsJustDon on September 22nd, 2006
You conspiracy idiots are always ready to blame the republicans due to your irrational hatred of them.
Last I checked the mayor of San Francisco was a democrat. Why would Ms. Rice, an evil blood drinking replublican, want to save any democrat? Wouldn't it make more sense, according to your theory, to have encouraged the mayor to fly, possibly die, and remove one more democrat leader?
What really disturbs me is that you and your crazy friends vote counts just as much as mine.
God Help the Republic.
by Theophilous on October 23rd, 2009
This is scary. like watching a movie. we will never get the story right.
by itinary on November 4th, 2009
Not as difficult & complicated as your making it. According to Jesse Ventura who was Governor of MN at the time said, "Washington sent out a notice to all government offices the day before advising them not to travel to NY NY."
He also says, "Politics are just like wrestling. In front of the public they hate each other, but behind close doors away from the public eye they are playing golf together while their wives are playing bridge while their kids are playing sports with each other."
The problem is Americans for the most part are so stupid they believe everything they hear that comes over that idiot box they call a tv.
Fact: Larry Silverstein took out a insurance policy 6 weeks prior to 911 which cost $15,000,000 (15 million) specifically in case there was a terrorist attack. He had a policy wrote up on each of the towers which he collected 6 weeks later in the amount of $7,000,000,000 (7 billion).
Not bad seeing he just took possession of the property in the spring of 2001.
After almost 10 yrs now, I think it is safe to say the only ones denying the fact that it was a inside job are either the ones behind it or those who are just plain lazy & stupid that have no place in America as they are not worthy of being called an American & should also be tried for treason against their own country.
Because if your not part of the solution, then your part of the problem. And this problem needs to be resolved!
by Iceander on June 23rd, 2011