No race is superior. As a matter of fact, the concept of "race" in humans is doubtful in the first place. So yes, the whole idea of an alleged superiority of the so-called Aryan race is fantasy and not scientifically based. It should be discarded.

I am not a scientist. I learn that gene can be turn on and turn off by the foods we eat, the places we live, the ways we educated,etc.

...well I know a German guy with blonde hair and blue eyes and he is definitely not smarter than most of the other people I know, so I am going to say that it is just a Hitler thing and therefore superficial.

hell no it's some hitler trash.

There are some links to racial origin and intelligence/health, however they are not prevalent in all individuals. Hitler's "Aryan Race" was one composed of Nordic Europeans (Scandinavians and other Northern, fair-skinned Europeans). He placed races on a rigid hierarchy beginning with the Nordic Europeans, then Alpine Europeans, Mediterranean Europeans, Asiatics, Hispanics, Native Americans, and ending with Africans. Supposedly, his goal was to replace the "Untermensch" (sub-human, inferior races) with the "Ubermensch" (super-human, superior race) through systematic ethnic cleansing.

i know no one is going to like this answer, but there is some science behind it. the average IQ of a white person is 100, the average IQ of a black person is 70. being taller, and well built, are also traits of the aryan, and are no doubt superior (in a physical sort of way; if you disagree, would you rather be in a fight as the shorter and less built guy?) blond hair and blue eyes.. i dont have any statistics as to if those traits are superior or not. so yes, i believe science stands behind the average aryan being "superior" if you are talking about intellegence/strength. also, the majority of inventions, and succesfull societies were established, and are maintained by whites. however, hitler blew this way out of proportion, and by no means is every aryan better than every non-aryan, and no non-aryan should be discriminated. it may be politically incorrect, but the idea of politically correct is childsplay.

i understand hitler was influenced by a female russian arthor ,a cultist,sorcerer, fortune teller,and when hitler was at lowest emotionally a german fortune teller correctly predicted hitlers rise to lead as a great leader of the third reich.the super race he was looking for did not exist.GOD MADE ALL MAN IN HIS IMAGE.of cource it would be boring if all men was a like exactly

1) "The origins of the Nazi version of the theory of the master race were in 19th century racial theories of Count Arthur de Gobineau, who argued that cultures degenerate when distinct races mix. It was believed at this time that Southern European and Eastern European peoples were racially mixed with non-European Moors from across the Mediterranean Sea, while Northern Europeans remained pure. Proponents of Nordic theory further argued that Nordic peoples had developed innate toughness and determination due to the harsh, challenging climate in which they evolved. Thus the racial ideal of these theorists was the tall, blond and blue-eyed Nordic individual." Source and further information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_race "A complete, highly speculative theory of Aryan and anti-Semitic history can be found in Alfred Rosenberg's major work, The Myth of the Twentieth Century. Rosenberg's well researched account of ancient history melded with his racial speculations proved to be very effective in spreading racialism among German intellectuals in the early 20th century, especially after the first World War. These and other ideas evolved into the Nazi use of the term "Aryan race" to refer to what they saw as being a master race of people of northern European descent. They worked to maintain the purity of this race through eugenics programs (including anti-miscegenation legislation, compulsory sterilization of the mentally ill and the mentally deficient, the execution of the institutionalized mentally ill as part of a euthanasia program)." Source and further information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race 2) "The anti-Nordicist writer Giuseppe Sergi argued in his influential book The Mediterranean Race (1901) that there was no evidence that the upper tiers of ancient societies were Nordic, insisting that historical and anthropological evidence contradicted such claims. Sergi argued that Mediterraneans constituted "the greatest race in the world", with a creative edge absent in the Nordic race. They were the creators of all the major ancient civilizations, from Mesopotamia to Rome. This argument was later repeated by C. G. Seligman, who wrote that "it must, I think, be recognized that the Mediterranean race has actually more achievement to its credit than any other". Even Carleton Coon insisted that among Greeks "the Nordic element is weak, as it probably has been since the days of Homer...It is my personal reaction to the living Greeks that their continuity with their ancestors of the ancient world is remarkable, rather than the opposite." " "With the rise of Nazism many critics pointed to the flaws in the theory, repeating the arguments made by Sergi and others that the evidence of ancient Nordic achievement is thin when set against the civilizations of the Mediterranean and elsewhere. The equation of Nordic and Aryan identity was also widely criticised. In 1936 M.W. Fodor, writing in The Nation, claimed that racialised Germanic nationalism arose from an inferiority complex: No race has suffered so much from an inferiority complex as has the German. National Socialism was a kind of Coué method of converting the inferiority complex, at least temporarily, into a feeling of superiority. After World War II, the categorization of peoples into "superior" and "inferior" groups fell even further out of political and scientific favor, eventually leading to the characterization of such theories as scientific racism. The tripartite subdivision of "Caucasians" into Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean groups persisted among some scientists into the 1960s, notably in Carleton Coon's book The Origin of Races (1962). Already race academics such as A. James Gregor were heavily criticizing Nordicism. In 1961 Gregor called it a "philosophy of despair", on the grounds that its obsession with purity doomed it to ultimate pessimism and isolationism. As late as 1977 the Swedish author Bertil Lundman wrote a book The Races And Peoples Of Europe mentioning a "Nordid Race". The development of the Kurgan theory of Indo-European origins weakened the Nordicist equation of Aryan and Nordic identity, since it placed the earliest Indo-European speakers around central Asia and/or far-eastern Europe. The emergence of population genetics further undermined the categorisation of Europeans into clearly defined racial groups. A 2007 study using samples exclusively from Europe found an unusually high degree of European homogeneity: "there is low apparent diversity in Europe with the entire continent-wide samples only marginally more dispersed than single population samples elsewhere in the world." Recent IQ studies have also provided little support for Nordicist claims. The highest scores IQ scores are to be found among Germans in one study, but according to IQ and Global Inequality, a book published by Richard Lynn in 2006, and making an average of several studies, Italians have the highest IQ scores in Europe. These studies show little correlation to the "Nordic" model." Source and further information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_race

No race is superior to another race. The negroes in Africa made a different development in regard of a better climate. People in the north made a different devolopment as matter of the climate. Why should the negroes in Africa invent things if they had anything they needed. That makes them not inferior. They just were lucly with the climate like peopel at many parts of the world and in Europe people had to invent thing in order to survive. But in regard of culture, arts and lifestyle you cannot say that there is a culture inferior to another one.