- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
We (Catholics) don't treat him like God, but he IS the head of our Church and we DO revere him as such. I know many people do not understand it, but I truly wish they would at least be tolerant and respectful of my religion.
I wouldn't think so.
He's only an important figure head
that lots of people have a very high esteem for
***I tells ya, it was this big***

Because people think of him as being the next best thing to Jesus. Basically what I mean is that he is the only one man in the world that could say he heard the word of god as jesus did without being thrown into a loony bin.
So, just to set the record straight on a few issues here:
1. We don't believe the Pope is like God. Sometimes we get excited at seeing him or respect him a lot. People also get excided about lots of other people, nobody tells them they hold that person as being divine.
2 the Pope is not considered necessarily "closer" to God than others. Saints come to mind as an obvious example of people we consider closer to God, not because they are chosen apart from us, we all have vocations and are chosen, but because their faith and works are closer to God and they listen to Him more.
3. The Pope is not considered better than other people by virtue of being Pope. People might believe that a person better than average should be Pope, or think that an exceptional person became Pope (think JPII) but he is not better by being the Pope. He is the successor of Peter and we all know Peter was not perfect. This is the position he holds and he is respected for that. And bear in mind some Popes were loved, some were not. We don't all just fall into awe at seeing our Pope. We might get excited though:) at times (both positively or negatively)
4. We do not believe everything the Pope says is infailable. Statements made in infailable way are much rarer than people think and they usually involve matters of faith that concern only Catholics (and maybe other Christians in the sense that they may agree or disagree). I doubt a Budhist or atheist would go sleepless nights on wether our Blessed Mary (the last major dogma dating more than 100 years ago) was born or not without original sin (to give but one example). Infailibility is rarely invoked and usually it could approve of an already widely held belief or settle a major theological issue. We do believe in these extraordinary circumstances the Holy Spirit takes pity on us if you wish and guides the Pope to a decision. Again, don't know why this would be major news outside Christianity. I guess people think we have dogmas flying in day in and day out so we could be spared from thinking for ourselves. While a fashionable belief, it is simply not true. I'm sorry if this spoils the "herd" stereotype some believe in.
He is just another person selected by a group of people to be pope.
God is God and human beings should not be considered as god.
First, not all people, just Catholics ;)
Well, he's not really treated like God. Bear in mind that the Pope is the leader of a billion Catholics worldwide. If you're not a Catholic, you can see him as the leader of an independent state (the Vatican).
Either way, he holds a very high position that deserves some form of respect.
Because they've been lied to for 1700 years.
one of satans tricks that we worship a man or something over him
Those who exalt the Pope to a position of extreme adulation (I doubt anyone would say "God" or "Like God" but extreme adulation) do so from a point of tradition.
In the early centuries of Christianity, there was no real centre, especially after Jerusalem fell to the Romans in AD 70. However, after a while several centres developed: Byzantium/Constantinople, Rome, Antioch amongst them. Although there were other centres as well (including Damascus, Nicaea, Lyon, Alexandria, Edessa), these eventually came to recognise five centres, all of which claimed founding by an apostle, as pre-eminent. They were Jerusalem , Antioch, Rome, Alexandria, and Byzantium. As Jerusalem, Alexandria and Antioch fell to Islamic armies towards the Middle Ages, this left Byzantium and Rome as the two major centres, Rome looking after the remains of the western Roman empire and Byzantium looking after the remains of the Eastern Empire. They were equals in authority, neither had supremacy over the other UNTIL the Bishop of Rome claimed certain rights of the pagan Pontifex Maximus of the Romans, and began to speak as if he were superior to the Patriarch of Constantinople.
This led to bad blood, and an eventual mutual excommunication in 1054.By this time, both centres had adopted practices from ancient religions and imported them into Christianity, to the point that it resembled , very little, in form, and in practice (in many areas) New Testament Christianity.
The schism of 1054, led to the Pope claiming primacy over the entire Christian church and to his instituting more and more non-Biblical practices. The personage of the Pope rose and rose until it achieved the status it has now.
The truth is: he calls himself the Vicar or Stand-in of Christ, but Christ needs no one to hold this position. Christ is the only Mediator between God and man.
Pope is a false, in the bible it says the only way to god is through jesus NOT POPE but JESUS,
CATHOLIC PEOPLE DO TREAT THAT POPE LIKE GOD.. I KNOW BECAUSE MY FAMILYS CATHOLIC AND I AM NOT.. IDK WHY THOUGH... THEY ALSO TREAT MOTHER MARY LIKE A SORT OF GOD TOO..
Because Catholics are deceived and didn't do their research... Sheeple just follow along with what everybody else is doing. It's easier to let someone else tell you what truth is, rather than for you to get off your butt do your own research and find God, not Religion. God is not religion.
Religion is man-made and was created to manipulate and control the weak-minded. (Think Jedi's here)
Catholicism is Idolatry. It is certainly not Christian. They also worship Mary and pray to her. Catholicism is simply Paganism. RESEARCH!!!
PS,
the Pope is the false prophet who will give power to the Beast (satan) in Revelation. The harlot church sits on seven hills - Rome. Come on people, wake up. This is elementary prophesy. You probably actually believe Bush is a christian too. LOL
http://www.cuttingedge.org/articles/rome.html
http://godsonlygospel.com/Pagan%20Connection2.htm
http://www.west.net/~antipas/books/xmas/xmas.html
Peace & Love
God IS Love!
Tradition?
He is just another person to me with the same strengts and weaknesses.
Other people see him as a god.
In my opinion, the papacy is a long-term brainwash that blinded their minds.
My 2 cents.
You're right. A large number of people do treat the Pope like he is God. Is that right? Well, no. It's probably because they think that he is more close to God than they are. Really, though, if the Pope really followed the whole Bible, he would be married and have children. If you don't believe me, look up I Timothy 3:5 (KJV), which clearly says, "(For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)". I guess Catholics don't really think I Timothy 3 and 4 are important or something.
because they think he's as close to God as man can get?
I would say they've been taught wrongly. Noone is faultless. Not me, not you and not the Pope. Just because a person is at the top doesn't mean he is better than anyone else.
I don't think people do as much as you think they do. And if they do, they shouldn't. that would be "having other gods before me", which is against Christian teachings.
Because it shows how much sence they have. It's like one can crown a bull Frog, and set it before them, and they would bow them selfs down to it.
You obviously have not seen people adore God and then just show great respect the Pope.
John 21:15-17 states:
When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, "Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Feed my lambs."
He then said to him a second time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" He said to him, "Yes, Lord, you know that I love you." He said to him, "Tend my sheep."
He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love me?" Peter was distressed that he had said to him a third time, "Do you love me?" and he said to him, "Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you." (Jesus) said to him, "Feed my sheep.
Matthew 16:17-19 states:
Jesus said to him in reply, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
The Catholic Church believes the Lord made Simon alone, whom he named Peter, the "rock" of his Church. He gave him the keys of his Church and instituted him shepherd of the whole flock.
The Pope is the senior pastor of 1.1 billion Catholic Christians, the direct successor of Simon Peter.
The Pope’s main roles include teaching, sanctifying, and governing.
For more information, see the Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 880-882: http://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt1sect2chpt3art9p4.htm#880
With love in Christ.
because Catholics are crazy and this is why the Eastern Orthodox Church split.
The term "pope" was a title claimed by Boniface III in 607 A.D. The word comes from a Latin word "papa" which means father." Other terms are used such as "pontiff" which means: bridge builder, the link between this life and the next. Then there is title "vicar of Christ" -- a person authorized to perform the functions of another; substitute in office. Here is what is taught,
according to the Texas Catholic Conference, Department of Religious Education,
1988: "The Pope is the Vicar of Christ, successor of St. Peter and visible head of the church. He takes the place of Christ."
The pope cannot be the "vicar of Christ," i.e. His substitute as Head of the church because the Bible plainly declares Jesus Christ to be the Head of the church and no one else: Eph.1:22; 4:15; 5:23; Col.1:18. Even Peter, whom the Catholics claim was the first pope, was not confused as to who was the Head when he wrote: "Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto
them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner." (1 Peter 2:7)
The term "pontiff" is also unscriptural because "there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus" (1 Timothy 2:5).
By the way, Peter could not have been the first Pope because he was married (Matt.8:14), he refused to be worshipped (Acts 10:25-26), and he was rebuked by the apostle Paul (Gal.2:11). Neither was the N.T. church built upon Peter.
It was established and founded by Jesus Christ, according to Matthew 16:18, who is the Rock (petra). Peter was the "petros": a little stone, pebble. Peter was but one among many building stones made alive through Christ from which He built His church.
It sounds like a joke, but catholics call the pope "the representative of god on Earth." Mormons have their own full-time-god-connected-prophet, catholics have god's agent himself. It seems like the competition goes on. Soon we will have another sect claiming to have an exclusivity contract with god. Did you say Jews? Children have more creative games.
This week he is "American Idol".

Because he represents God on Earth.
Because of his AWESOME hat!

I think it because, they need to have a physical person to look up to, since God and Jesus are spirits.
cuz he's the Pope, and you ain't ... jealous?
because that is how people tend to portray him. The pope is merely a human being, same as you or me. I'd treat the pope the same as anyone else. Id address him by his first name. Which what is his first name anyway?
He's second in command yo...
Hey hey Sweet T!
I think it's mainly Catholics that may think that way. Personally, I hold my minister in high standards (but not near as high as I would do God).
For Catholics,
He is the messenger of Gods word;) he is human like all the rest of us;)
Whats the Popes Poop..........(HOLY SHIT).LOL;)>
To Catholics he receives his instructions directly from God (in the broad sense).
Therefore, his word is infaliable.
He isn't a God. The Pope is just an average guy like you and me. He needs Jesus Christ like us all. I don't worship the pope and neither do I call Him "The Holy Father". That name "The Holy Father" is a title reserved only for God.
This current pope was a former Hitler youth for crying out loud. The pope is not God.
Mostly, I think, because they were taught to. Their parents were Catholic so they follow suit, on and on down the line.
The Pope is NOT on the same level as Jesus. He is a man , simple.
srsly, i feel the same way.
people should look to God not some random pope man.
HOLY FATHER is a title that belongs to the ALMIGHTY himself and they even have to rip him off with that!
Because he is His representative on earth as designated by St Peter.
Because he thinks he is God,and we do need to humor the old boy.
it comes from emperor worship after constantine after all thats where catholocism got its start and also pledging allegiance its not called roman catholicism for nowt personaly i would rather spit on it and die before bowing to anything concerning it
As the nuns taught me - the pope takes the place of Jesus on earth. As an adult, I find this hard to believe, though I do revere the pope. Peter was the first pope, and the pope is part of the apolostic succession. Jesus WAS, remember and 100% human as well as 100% God. He was born without original sin, and thus he was perfect in the way that God had planned for all of us to be perfect. Our pope is perfect because although he was born in original sin, he was baptized, confessed his human frailties and made perfect. It is his office that makes his decisions infalible. There. I am a Lutheran. Lol.
religion is the worst topic someone can get into because its the number one argument in the world next to politics
I think the fact that they can see him. Its much easier to worship something you can see. I don't Understand it myself, but I hope those people Worship God first and foremost.
The Pope is God`s representative here on Earth. He is not God but the closest thing to it.
they just have huge reverence for him. there's no religion that worships the pope. nor is there one that worships mary
first question: how do people treat God?
1) Popalatry (or papalatry) is a cult of personality on the person of the pope.
See here some information about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_cult
2) "It is due to a false idea which in future ages might be declared by the Church to be a heresy, yet for now we will content ourselves with calling it a false opinion. It has been called in recent years "Papalatry". In one sense we could take it as a worship of the Pope, but it would not be an accurate description of the phenomenon to mean that literally. The droves of adoring faithful who keep shouting Santo Subito do not worship John Paul II or the current Pope as a god in reality, and I would say many truly want to be Catholic. When we use the term Papalatry therefore, it is to be taken as treating the Pope as infallible in his actions and judgments, rather than in statements of faith and morals."
"Couldn't it be that the Pope made a serious mistake in judgment? Why is that so impossible? Progressives all the time insist that priestly celibacy is merely a custom and can be done away with, and it is a mistake to continue it, and conservatives don't contest that it is not matter for the sacrament. Why doesn't it work the other way?
Of course there is no good answer to that. It does work the other way because the Pope, any Pope can err in judgment. The danger of Papalatry is that it places upon a pope, in the modern instance Pope John Paul II, a burden that he could never carry even if he did everything right. It is a burden no Pope could ever carry, not even great Popes such as Pope St. Leo the Great, or Pope St. Pius X! (Real "great" popes, unlike our modern pretender) It is the burden of being an inerrant and impeccable half-godlike being, which no man is and no man can pretend to be. Thus we arrive at a situation where people reject their better sense or accept and even defend things they would never do for the sake of supporting whatever the Pope does, and being "with the Pope"."
Source and further information:
http://athanasiuscm.blogspot.com/2007/03/papalatry.html
Further information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infallibility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility
I agree with others that the Pope's high esteem is primarily from a Catholic perspective. The Pope is considered to be a successor to St. Peter upon whom Jesus said he would build his church. The Pope is considered infallible when speaking on faith and morals.
That was one of the things I was thinking of. Also he said developed countries must offer to help eliminate poverty. True.
Because people need a symbol to worship. The concept of 'god' is too vast to comprehend so we need a person-figure to represent god.
What does the pope wear to sleep?
by Answerbag Staff on July 20th, 2010
| 2 people like this
If The President of US were the Pope what would have changed in the World's life?
by prof. mes solzhenitsy on June 7th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Why doesn't the Pope run for president?
by aiar on October 11th, 2011
| 3 people like this
How would you act/or say if you met the pope?
by Bornabrit on July 13th, 2011
| 7 people like this
Does the Pope tweet? What do you think?
by Baba on June 28th, 2011
| 8 people like this
You're reading Why do people treat the Pope, like he is God?
Comments
+
by Barcaluv on April 24th, 2008
so true meg +6
by Mentalmum is back on April 24th, 2008
Here here!
by Babycakes on April 24th, 2008
Since when is the catholic church tolerant and respectful? A bit of history reading would help. You may not treat the pope as god, but popes claim to be God's representatives on Earth, which is as preposterous as being treated like gods.
by Giordano Bruno on May 4th, 2008
Thanks, Giordano, for proving my point about disrespect and intolerance. Oh, and before you go off all half-cocked about how I should read history, maybe I should mention I have my undergrad degree in History and I am credits away from having my master's in the same. I know history. I know it well. And I know that MAN'S abuse of power does NOT belong to Catholicism alone.
by Meg is exhausted on May 5th, 2008
Meg....you ROCK!
by Babycakes on May 5th, 2008
can't do it this time :(
by j ninja... on May 5th, 2008
I'm just glad to see you js!!...Have a great Monday:)
by Babycakes on May 5th, 2008
You too!
by j ninja... on May 5th, 2008
well said Meg, wish i could point you up some more!!!
by Mentalmum is back on May 5th, 2008
It's the thought that counts, Mentalmum:)
by Meg is exhausted on May 5th, 2008
well if the catholics were more tolerant, and respectful, other people outside the church might be more apt to follow suit, but alas that is not the case.
Oh btw, never break up with starbucks, starbucks is a absolute good lol, keeps me goin.
by DiSTurBiA on May 15th, 2008
Was I disrespectful for asking this question ?
by Sweet T on May 16th, 2008
@Sweet T...no, you weren't disrespectful, unless you meant it as a slam against Catholicism. The pursuit of knowledge is always a noble goal. But this question came on a day where I had been fielding criticisms about the Pope and Catholicism all day (due to the Papal US visit) and I was pretty much fed up.
by Meg is exhausted on May 16th, 2008
I see, and no I was not making fun of Catholics, I truly wanted explanations, to a question, that I have had for a long time.
by Sweet T on May 16th, 2008
Ok:)
by Meg is exhausted on May 16th, 2008
well those criticisms are there for a reason.
by DiSTurBiA on May 16th, 2008
The criticisms are there because of the anti-Catholic prejudice and ignorance regarding the Catholic faith. In most cases, the ignorance is invincible. People that have never learned anything about Catholicism from Catholics nevertheless see themselves as qualified to comment on Catholicism. Their hurtful comments can be excused to a degree because they have only learned a caricature of Catholicism -- they are largely ignorant regarding authentic Catholic teaching.
It has been my experience that the most vicious quips seem to always come from lapsed Catholics. Coincidently, history has shown that lapsed Catholics (Hitler, Stalin) have committed the most vicious atrocities against others. Our modern day apostates seem to follow in their footsteps by their vitriol.
Apostates and heretics come and go, the Catholic Church always remains, just as her founder promised.
by Aldebaran on May 25th, 2008
I was a catholic, and those criticisms seem quite valid from what I have seen in two churches.
by DiSTurBiA on May 25th, 2008
Thank you for your thoughts, Aldebaran. You are absolutely right. People who are quick to judge Catholicism are those who know the least about TRUE Catholicism. Soemtimes it feels like I am fighting an uphill battle trying to defend my faith.
by Meg is exhausted on May 27th, 2008
Pol Pot wasn't a lapsed Catholic
by purplecows on June 11th, 2008
I was raised in a catholic family and highschool.
And I still must say, catholic church as an institution does not inspire much respect or faith.
by hardskapunk on June 11th, 2008
@hardspank: I have had the complete opposite expereince. I have found Catholiscism to be profoundly inspirational and uplifting. Pretty much you take out if it what you put into it.
by Meg is exhausted on June 12th, 2008
Opps I meant hardskapunk. I apologize for spelling your user name wrong:)
by Meg is exhausted on June 12th, 2008
No problem :)
The problem with these arguments is that it all comes down to faith, something not compatible with analytic reason.
I'm not against catholicism, im against its church.
Ever saw Stigma?
by hardskapunk on June 12th, 2008
Faith and reason are both gifts from the one true God. "God desires all men to be saved AND to come to a knowledge of the truth". God wants us to use our intellect in a right way.
Now hardskapunk proves my point. His view of the Church is from Stigmata, a film from Hollywood where the Church's moral teaching is laughed at and ignored.
Here's a question for the "I'm not against Catholicism, I'm against its Church" crowd. Did Jesus Christ foresee that the priests, bishops, and popes would be sinful, some of them gravely so? Of course He did because He's God. So why does He use them in the Church? Well, He does it. So let's not worry about why He does it, just accept that the Catholic Church is full of sinners. Nevertheless, it is unreasonable to judge the truth of Catholicism by those who fail to live up to its teachings. It totally unreasonable to deprive yourself of the Mass and sacraments because this or that priest is a sinner; knowing that Christ set up the One Church for sinners!
by Aldebaran on June 12th, 2008
As a non-catholic, I have to tell you that was a very good response to that question. Kudos to you.
by Ananamiss on July 31st, 2008
[Meg is shallower than a rain puddle]
You said the pope is "the head of the Church."
Ephesians 5:23--
"For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church..."
Christ should be your leader and the head.
by AnonymousFK on October 16th, 2008
@Anonymous: *yawn* I love it when Protestants try to demonize Catholicism! SO fun!
Matthew 16:18-
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
by Meg is exhausted on October 16th, 2008
Try "Catholic Answers" www.catholic.com
by purplecows on October 17th, 2008
I am actually not a Protestant. And with all humility, I will like to tell you that the scripture that you just quoted does not help your case. Peter taught the truth to others. However, he is not the rock.
1Corinthians 10:3--
"And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them:and that Rock was Christ."
1Corintians3:11--
"For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ."
Christ is the foundation of the church.The church is built upon him and his teachings.Peter was the first to teach his teachings.
by AnonymousFK on October 21st, 2008
If you are not Protestant, than what faith system do you prescribe to? I would at least like to know who I am dealing with here.
by Meg is exhausted on October 21st, 2008
I am Christian; however, I am not part of Prostestant churches that was established after the Catholic church.
by AnonymousFK on October 25th, 2008
My dear, if you are not Catholic, then by process of elimination you are Protestant. (Unless you are Eastern Orthodox)
by Meg is exhausted on October 26th, 2008
There is one church you did not mention;however,you probably hear it all the time, the early church also known as the Church of Christ.Romans 16:16. This church was back then and goes on today. And this is the church I am member of.
Also, Christian is the name we go by.
Isaiah 62:2, "And the Gentiles shall see your righteousness, and all kings your glory: and you will be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name."
Acts 11:26, "...And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch."
by AnonymousFK on November 2nd, 2008
Meg is one smart Catholic, I would encorage Catholic women to look up to her.
by Leah on February 12th, 2009
Um, if I know my bible, there is NO head of the church except Jesus himself. Eph 1:22, Eph 5:23.
So if there is another man, mascerading around as the 'head of the church' he is MOST certainly anti-Christ. 2 Thess 2:3,4
by sassafrass on February 28th, 2009
sassafrass,
.
You are of course correct to a degree. But to ignore the 2000 year history of the Church that always had a Pope as a successor to St. Peter is leaving a big stone unturned. Christ definitely gave the keys to Peter and definitely conferred authority upon him. Christ definitely gave orders to Peter ("feed my lambs", etc.). Christ know that the person of Peter would not live forever, the great commission would take time (Matt 28), therefore the office Peter as the visible head of the Church must be real.
.
Being that you've demonstrated an open mind with your comments, you might interested in the Catholic view of the papacy from a perspective that is different from what you have been taught, see http://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/pope.htm .
.
All the best to you.
by Aldebaran on March 1st, 2009
Aldebaran, But, Jesus also gave the 'keys' to all the other disciples in Matt 18:18. Peter used those keys to open the kingdom when he said "Repent and be baptized..." Acts 2:38. And on the subject of loosing and binding, the orginal Greek language means "will have already been loosed" and "will have already been bound." Jesus was not giving the apostles the power to dictate the law of God with Heaven's endorsement, but declaring that they would be inspired to deliver the law which was already conceived in Heaven. After the apostles, there was no more inspiration. 'That which was perfect' which is the written word in the form of the Gospels and epistles was complete.
by sassafrass on March 1st, 2009
Re-read Matt 18. Christ never gave anyone but Peter the keys. And by the time St. John died, the Church was on its third pope. And it was Pope Damasus that declared what books were in the Bible, even though St. Jerome thought a different set was inspired.
.
Please read the link I supplied. Is it possible you were not taught the truth?
by Aldebaran on March 5th, 2009
The catholic church didnt write the bible...they might have picked and chose what the books where...but God still has a way of reaching his people, with what little they gave. The Catholic church isnt the "One true church" Christ did set up a church.." and he did give the keys to peter. But that does not keep the church from being "immuned" to evil...The church has been perverted and taught all kinds of decietful things. It is the great deciever, who has done MANY evil in the past. MANY things that would be hypocritical, and GO AGAINST THE BIBLE ITSELF. which the "catholics put togather"...All things in the religion go stricktly against Gods word. If you cant see it, "youve been decieved."
by schmee2369 on May 2nd, 2009
Where did the Catholic Church get its authority to chose which books were inspired and which were not? Did it make a mistake in doing so?
.
Christ set up one Church in Matt 16 that teaches one faith (Eph 4). The Bible gives testimony to these truths, as it does to the fact that Christ gave Peter the keys to the kingdom.
.
The people in the Church have all been sinners -- perverts, murderers, rapist, you name it, they have been in Catholic Church. Don't make the error of confusing the human element of the Church with the Divine. Catholic teaching is authentic and a gift from God. The sinful actions of the broken instruments in the Church are not.
.
Again, don't judge the truths taught by the Catholic faith by the actions of those who FAIL to embrace its teachings. To do so is illogical.
.
Your *opinion* that Catholic teaching goes against the bible makes no sense. Why would the Church that preserved the Bible for 10 centuries before the advent of printing teach things opposed to it?
by Aldebaran on May 3rd, 2009
Good one Alberan, I got one, where did King James get the athourty to rewrite the bible.
by Leah on May 3rd, 2009