ANSWERS: 6
-
nope. i believe they only apply that when the age difference is more than 4 years. but since the girl is 17 they pretty much concider her an adult anyway. thats more for like 23 year old with a 14 year old
-
having the age of concent that high pritty much asks it to be broken in that way
-
Yeah. The law is very strict on sexual relations and of underage minors. He would be considered a sexual molester because the state's consent for sex is 18 years old. But how would he be known as a sexual molester, if there was no proof?
-
What state are you in? If the age of consent is 18, then you both committed a crime when the 16 year old girl and 17 year old guy had sex (although, this would rarely ever be prosecuted). Similarly, when the 18 year old guy had sex with the 17 year old girl, that is a crime on the part of the 18 year old (if the age of consent is just 18). This too, would not be prosecuted in most states. However, in most states the age of consent is not a single age. Rather, it is a range of ages older than the minor. Thus, although 18 may be the age in which you can consent to having sex with someone of any age, it may still be legal for a 16 or 17 year old to consent to an 18 or 19 year old.
-
depends on state, but federal law says yes. wait till she is of age, if you love her you will.
-
Look here for the age of concent in your state,or country...http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm The situation you have stated is exactally why I believe the age of concent should be placed at 12 or 13 and with no age difference statutes. The only way this will come about is for young people to bombard their congressmen or ministers (federal or provencial)to lower the age and quit making criminals out of young people for enjoying themselves and sex.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 