If a married couple never wanted kids, would it be best for men or women to have sterilization?
by 
Yahoo Answers Is A Fraud
ANSWERS: 12
-
Typically a vasectomy for the males in much less risky and easier than tubal ligation or hysterectomies in females.
-
probably not a matter of "best" but male sterilization used to be easier than female--may not be the case anymore with the less invasive surgery available to women.
-
Should be the guy. It's easier, quicker and much safer.
-
It's less invasive for the man to be sterilized. They do the vasectomy as an outpaitent surgury (sometimes in the specialists' office) whereas a woman has to be cut across the midsection and it takes several months (weeks at least) to heal. It's also alot easier to reverse a vasectomy (vasovasectomy) than it is to reverse getting your tubes tied.
-
I dont really know Whats BEST. They both seem the same. Cut, snip, tie, DONE.
-
Besides being much easier on the man than the woman, it is waayyy cheaper too!
-
Ditto . . . not quite so invasive for men. Heals quicker also.
-
I always thought such sexual beings would suffer mental side effects to being removed from the capability to breed, in animals you cut the male tho so thats what id say, Off with his nuts!!
-
The procedure for a woman requires major surgery, hospitalization and a lengthy recuperation. For men, it's an inpatient procedure with a day's rest, a simple, snip snip
-
The guy. He has no need for his balls anymore anyway. He's married.
-
PLEASE listen go read up on some of this - http://www.tubal-reversal.net/post_tubal_ligation_syndrome.htm It is serious! . Let the man get sniped! Please help spread the word of P.T.L.S.!
-
I'd say the man. It is easier, cheaper, and much less complicated.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC