- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
LdS: what does "We declare the means by which mortal life is created to be divinely appointed"* mean EXACTLY?
by k on January 25th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Do Mormons have to watch reruns of Battlestar Galactica?
by Mister_Bromyde on May 13th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Mormons: Do you believe that Joseph Smith Jr.'s 1891 prophecy has been fulfilled?
by k on December 6th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Has an LDS prophet ever spoken against Dungeons and Dragons?
by John Cox will be back April 6th 2013 on July 15th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
do mormons believe in being "saved"?
by Does it matter? on October 7th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Do Mormons believe that Satan is the brother of Jesus?
- which can also be phrased in the following ways:
Comments
Couldn't have said it better myself! Thanks Bob!
by Charles Sampson on July 9th, 2004
Interesting info... thanks!
by Merry Walker on July 20th, 2004
Perfect answer! Thanks!
by Kat Maye on August 31st, 2004
Actually, the intent of that statement is more insidious. It is to say that the "Jesus" of Mormonism is really a devil.
by Glenn Blaylock on September 29th, 2004
The Bible says that Lucifer (Satan) was a created by God as an angel not a spirit brother of Jesus.
by pacella23 on March 12th, 2005
pacella23, if Jesus is the son of God, then your statement(Lucifer created by God) shows that Lucifer and Jesus are brothers.
by kman99 on March 27th, 2005
I agree with kman99.
by scymitar72 on August 16th, 2005
pacman: Are you saying that God 'Created the Devil' as opposed to the mormon belief that he chose to rebel as some sons do?
by Anonymous on October 24th, 2005
Well said. Personal choices define who we are. Satan fell from God's presence, Christ excelled, what will WE do?
by Aaron Cloward on October 27th, 2005
Iam sorry, your wrong Jesus is not our eldest brother he is God in the flesh.
by SHILOFIRE on November 19th, 2005
If you are all brothers of Jesus and Satan then Jesus and Satan are brothers
by death-to-noobs on February 20th, 2006
ShiloFire, just because you do not believe the same way doesn't make us wrong, it just means you have different faith.
by WishUponAStar on March 2nd, 2006
Indeed you are very right.
I totally agree
by Natylino121 on June 9th, 2007
Would he be our eldest brother? Was Jesus the first born child of the 'heavenly father'? What about those before him?
by Mini_kilt on July 12th, 2007
According to our beliefs Jesus was the first born of the Father's spirit childern.
by Glenn Blaylock on July 12th, 2007
I did not know that! That's a pretty cool thing to learn. So any teachings on the people before him or thier 'heavenly father' or lack thereof?
by Mini_kilt on July 12th, 2007
Jesus was the first born spirit child of our Heavenly Father, and of all these spirits, he was the only one that was perfect, hence the only one that could redeem us all from our sins, if we accept him as our Lord and Savior, so that's the way it was. I'll quote one of my favorite hymns:
I stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers me
Confused at the grace that so fully he proffers me
I tremble to know that for me he was crucified
That for me, a sinner, he suffered, he bled and died
Chorus:
Oh, it is wonderful that he should care for me enough to die for me
Oh, it is wonderful
Wonderful to me
I marvel that he would descend from his throne divine
To rescue a soul so rebellious and proud as mine
That he should extend his great love unto such as I
Sufficient to own, to redeem and to justify
(Repeat chorus)
by WishUponAStar on July 12th, 2007
I think of his hands, pierced and bleeding to pay my debt
Such mercy, such love and devotion can I forget?
No, no, I will praise and adore at the mercy seat
Until at the glorified throne I kneel at his feet
I stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers me
Secure in the promise of life in his victory
Thus ransomed from death I will live to my Savior's praise
And sing of his goodness and mercy through endless days
by WishUponAStar on July 12th, 2007
I found the answer to my question, all children of god were born before the earth was created and the order in which we are born into flesh as my understanding of it goes is, we choose our parents. What a beautiful thing to believe! I'm so glad I learned that.
by Mini_kilt on July 23rd, 2007
Some may believe that, but I know of no official source of doctrine that states how it is that members family units are chosen. So, we really do not know how it is that individuals are chosen for each family.
by Glenn Blaylock on July 24th, 2007
Hands are not pierced when one is crucified. The hands cannot hold the weight of the body and would tear away from the spikes.
When crucifying the spike (or what not) goes through the wrist and the achilles tendon.
So the depictions of Jesus on the cross in most churches are incorrect.
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 29th, 2008
And sing of his goodness and mercy through endless days
Sounds a tad boring. I would hope more interesting things go on.
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 29th, 2008
If we choose our parents some have gone horribly wrong in their choices ie those abused, sexually molested tortured and killed by their parents.
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 29th, 2008
patty, a few things:
• Christ’s hands *and* wrists were pierced during His crucifixion, so the hymn is correct.
• No one’s saying that’s all we’ll be doing “through endless days”; the hymn simply implies—correctly, I might add—that given all our Savior did for us, He deserves to be revered forever.
• As Glenn said, there‘s no reason to believe that we chose our parents. It’s a somewhat popular belief, but about the only source for it is a cheesy ’70s musical. ;-)
by the Otter on October 30th, 2008
'otter': I've tried to post my reply and my sources for not agreeing with your take on the crucifixion and these are derived from Christian texts which readily state the accepted ideas and interpretations of the crucifixion are incorrect, but the 'posting comments' just runs without posting. I'll give it another shot when I wander back this way. Waiting is not a given right now. Let us hope this comment posts at least. (I refuse to get paranoid about those behind the scenes editing)
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 30th, 2008
Archaeology does give us one vital clue as to the kinds of crosses used in Jesus' time by the Roman authorities. In June 1968, a tomb or depository for the bones of the dead was discovered on Ammunition Hill, north of Jerusalem. It contained the bones of a young man who had obviously been crucified, probably between A.D. 7 and A.D. 66
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 30th, 2008
The remains included the victim's two heel bones fastened together by a nail. His arms — not his hands — were nailed to the crossbar. The weight of the young man's body was borne by a plank nailed to the upright beam. This would have supported his buttocks. The victim's legs had been bent at the knees, both legs were broken. as were the legs of the two criminals crucified with Jesus Christ (John 19:32).
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 30th, 2008
"If Jesus died in similar fashion, " says the New Bible Dictionary, "then his legs were not fully extended as in traditional Christian art."
Also, the victim's feet were probably only inches above the ground. If that is so, we need to revise our mental image of Jesus' crucifixion on this point as well. Based on such archaeological discoveries, the Evangelical Dictionary of Theology states, "It seems that the Gospel accounts of the death of Jesus describe a standard Roman procedure for crucifixion."
by I am the God of Hellfire on October 30th, 2008