Yes. It is always difficult to fairly judge someone's qualities or actions, whoever it is. Even if we think that we have a lot of information about a person. My opinion is that: - one can believe him, as he mostly says what he does - he is has the capacity to be president. He is absolutely not unintelligent, as some people assume (but other people could also do that job) - he has been doing a lot of errors, in my opinion. Probably more than many other presidents did.

I believe I would not, and I have evaluate all the evidence, good, bad or indifferent -- The presidency of George Walker Bush is remarkable for the breadth and depth of its failures. The 'un-elected ruler' is poised to set new records for presidential unpopularity, and he still has about fourteen months to turn the rest of the nation against him -- He abundantly deserves the nation's resentment; his administration has been dogged by one massive scandal after the other, from the Katrina debacle, to Bush’s approval of illegal wiretapping and torture, to his unparalleled use of 'signing statements' to disobey laws he disagrees with, to the outrageous Alberto R. Gonzales and U.S. attorneys issue. It is usually history that judges the performance of a leader, but in George Walker Bush case, we don't really need to wait for history. There is never going to be a success in Iraq, if that is what the 24% of Americans is still waiting for to base their judgment -- The invasion was a big mistake to begin with and the strategies a miscalculation -- We no longer need to look for the meaning of failure in the dictionary because the Iraq war has it written all over. And putting the blame where it belongs will leave us with nobody but George Walker Bush and him alone. The entire good Bush has done (if any) as a president, has been shadowed by his mistake in invading Iraq and the denial to accept this error -- It is little wonder therefore that whenever his name is mentioned so is Iraq. It is like the two go together like the blind and his staff. If I am to give him any credit, I would say, George Walker Bush has been very successful in putting a 'fiction' to 'reality', which has turned out to be a disgrace to mankind. He would have been a very big hero in Hollywood, but being a president, is talent misplaced.

I believe that at this point, facts speak for themselves.

I don't make a habit of 'judging others.' If I was to do so, 'in fairness' I would have to have all the facts, which none of us have. That said, it's obvious to conclude that there have been several errors that have been made. As the President, he takes responsibility for these. I think that the office of President is much harder than the American people believe it to be. Bush has sat in the chair at a difficult time. Despite his errors, I hope he will enjoy what ramains of his life. I bid him no ill will.

No...I can judge fairly, and I think that a lot of people can't or refuse to when it comes to him.