When the existence of God was recently proven by drunken Russian Atheistic scientists were you a little skeptical?
by 
Larry Rhodes
ANSWERS: 22
-
No. I believe in drunken Russians.
-
I have learned to believe the unbelieveable a least once a day and the impossible at least once a week!!
-
And this is information from where?
-
They were drunk, enough said!
-
"Creationists make it sound as though a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being drunk all night." Isaac Asimov (Russian born atheistic scientist) Source: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov
-
The ONLY thing that would make me believe in any kind of God like being would be to see him in person!
-
No, not in the least. I have absolute blind faith in everything Drunken Russian Atheistic Scientists say. I belong to the Church of DRAS. If they say God exists, and that it's not incompatible with them being Atheists, then I will blindly ignore the apparent contradiction since I have faith that it's not a contradiction at all.
-
I wouldn't take driving directions from a drunk (Russian or otherwise)... Why would I take spiritual advice from one?
-
I am skeptical whoever claims they have proof that God either exists or does not exist!
-
Hm, yes. I am one of those weirdos who are of the school of thought that relatively little can ACTUALLY be proved.
-
Not as much as if it had been proven by drunken Russian scientific Atheists.
-
no, why would i be? they were russian after all.
-
what proof? hahahaha drunken russians eh well that proves non-existance to me.
-
I`m Russian and live in Russia and I`ve never heard the existence of God was recently proven by drunken Russian Atheistic scientists .Are you joking?
-
interesting! Yes I also believe in most drunken Russians, but furthermore, also in Albert Einstein, who also believed in God.
-
They may be able to show logical consistency. But it is illogical to assume that the scentific method, which is by defninition repeatable, could be used to prove/or disprove a single God/god, which is by defiition unique. The scientific method, which is natural, cannot be used in the mystical realm, which is super-natural. Just as subsonic fluid dynamics are differ from super-sonic fluid dynamics. To apply sub-sonic equations to super-sonic fluids results in wrong answers. Even faith in the scientific method is just that, faith. But it is only valid for non-unique situations. I choose the criteria upon which I base my faith. Why should I have faith in a drunken Russian, or even a sober scientist vs. my own experience or an ancient scroll or any other thing? I must choose. Nobody else can do it for me.
-
YES!!! I married a drunken russian atheistic scientist, so, anything they say is always right, or, well, let's just say it's a pretty grizzly sight. In reality, I'm always a little skeptical of everything. but, i open up to the logic, content, or passion, and, considering everything, judge it's probable veracity. but seriously, i don't mess with drunken russian atheistic scientists, no matter what they say...
-
i would not doubt their drunken assumption because i find that when i am drinking i am sometimes more rational than when sober... if they where "dead drunk" and happened to see him or his workings while they were dead, and got a chance to come back and tell us about it... i would believe it probably what are the details?
-
She exists?
-
No, never doubt the proofs provided by drunken Russian Atheistic scientists
-
She exists?
-
Nah. Drunken Russians are never wrong! Didja ever argue with one at a cocktail party? ;-)
iwnit RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC