ANSWERS: 16
-
No, mass murder of innocent people will not solve anything.
-
no.
-
No. Too many innocent people would die.
-
It might solve all the problems in that region, but I'm pretty sure it would be a case of "Out of the frying pan, into the fire" That would open up a whole new can of worms, not to mention destroying the infrastructue and contaminating the land under which the oil sits, which is the whole reason we're there in the first place.
-
That is indeed a crazy thought,and Iran isn't the problem in the middle east.
-
No. There are already too many innocent people dying over there. Killing everyone would not be a favorable solution.
-
Jimmy Carter should have done that in 1979 during the hostage crisis. Too late now, the terrorists are all over the place.
-
I would probably say yes. The casualties caused by the bomb vs. the casualties of war are probably somewhat comparable given that they drop it on a less populated region. But who's to say...?
-
I dont was President B's hands anywhere neat that big red button. I'll pass and let them kill each other like they have been doing.
-
no nuclear weapons are one of the catlysts for global warming. also think of how far the radiation would spread, in such close knit countries nuclear weapons is out of the question!!
-
No NO NO Nuclear warheads are only made as threats they are never intended to be used in any shape or form it would be suicide!!!!!!
-
Yes. Better one or two million die now than tens or even hundreds of millions in the years to come.
-
no way man we'd be there first target
-
No yo...
-
Of course not. Nuclear bombs are one of our biggest mistakes. Nothing good comes from nuclear warfare.
-
i wonder what the city fathers of Nagasaki would say about that, if they could speak to us all from their graves. developing those uranium weapons was a very bad idea from the beginning, and they're quite illogical too, you can't use one without creating that deadly fallout. and even if you launch a small precision guided tactical nuke at a military target, it could have dire consequences for the Army that launched it. nuclear war is a no-win scenario for both sides, and like in that game tick-tack-toe any nuclear holocaust would end in a draw anyway. my solution if i was the president of United States would be to demand from Congress that we put our best scientific minds together, and develop new radiation free weapons of mass destruction. yes just as powerful as those thermal nuclear weapons, but with no bad side effects. now when an enemy like Russian for instance, got news that we had superior weaponry that we could use at any time if the situation left us no other choice, they would be the first to offer their hand in friendship. and if Iran's stubborn leadership defiantly refused to behave themselves too,I would systematically target them for termination, not the innocent Iranian people. what can i say i'm a bit of a dreamer, praying that a nuclear nightmare scenario will never happen in my lifetime.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 