- NEW!
by BILLBOARD on July 24th, 2007
of course it was ...only pea brained idiots believe a couple of men sitting somewhere in a cave could have put together a plan that worked as well as it did.....
by DuncanPed on October 29th, 2007
lol; Anyone who thinks the government is efficient enough to pull something off like that and hide the fact from everyone obviously hasn't ever worked in or with the government!
by APACHEmeansENEMY on October 4th, 2007
Yes, I think the government had something to do with it.
by WHITE BEAR on August 20th, 2007
I think so.
So many questions remain unanswered, like how come no jets were scrambled, the population in the towers was much less as many were ordered to take a days leave, how come Bin Ladens friends got visas into the US weeks before and nothing was done.
I could well be the US needed a justification to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq to secure the uranium and oil supplies that they want to control.
by kedar on October 29th, 2007
At least 1/3 of the American people believe it was an inside job, I don't know, anything can be believed -- What we know is:
Twelve days before the September 11, 2001 attacks, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, had warned the U.S. -- George W. Bush and President Mubarak are said to be friends -- Mubarak's revelations concerning September 11 were published by a Lebanese newspaper on the September 7th, 2001.
In the weeks before the attacks, the CIA issued a warning that Osama Bin Laden was pressing for terrorist action against Americans. The warning was based on new intelligence.
Even after consenting to an investigation, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney stonewalled the commission set up to investigate as it follows:
Refused to allow National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to testify.
White House tried to limit Bush's testimony to one hour.
White House withheld about 75 % of almost 11,000 pages of former President Bill Clinton records pertaining to the investigation of the terrorist attacks -- This information was held at the National Archives.
They demanded that Bush and Cheney not be forced to testify under oath.
Bush and Cheney demanded to be allowed to testify together.
After months of negotiation, Bush finally allowed only four members of the commission to view only 24 of the 360 PDBs dating back to 1998; 'White House counsel Alberto Gonzales permitted them to see just 24.'
The Bush Administration attempted to discredit members of the commission, especially Jamie Gorelick.
In short, September 11, 2001 was used as a springboard for the pre-9/11 Bush scheme. The steps taken in the name of Homeland Security that were done in the name of 9/11 were actually already planned well before that event. It was the event that made it possible to implement them.
by Metaphiz on July 24th, 2007
Hmm, good question. . . So, let me get this straight, TWO planes hit (count 'em) TWO towers, on the same day, within moments of each other, and BOTH fall STRAIGHT DOWN. Before 911, you would need demolishion experts to accomplish this. Since 911, "Nah, just wreck a couple of jumbo jets into 'em." Not saying I know, or can even really speculate as to the whom is guilty, but. . .
I know this won't be a popular answer (oh well), but, Hmm, just sounds a bit fishy.
Think about it. . .
by Perryman on July 24th, 2007
No, we all saw the planes strike the outside of the Twin Towers.
by peterpam on July 24th, 2007
A ridiculous question!
by Gideon on July 24th, 2007
If, by your question, you mean did a bunch of misguided religious extremists from the Middle East get together and launch an attack against innocent US civilians, then yes.
by Quackers on October 29th, 2007
It's an inside job. I confess. I did it. I work as a special agent for the Feds.
I also did the Kennedy assassination.
by asweetguy4u2know saya R.I.P Nelson on October 4th, 2007
You know I am about sick and tired of all the accusations that President Bush paid the terrorists to carry out the attacks as a way of justifying attacking Iraq. Where is the proof? What eveidence is there that he had any involvement in it? If there is undeniable evidence he did this why has it not been presented to the proper authorities so he could be prosecuted for it? President Bush is alot of things. A cold blooded murderer is not one of them though. If he wanted to justify attacking Iraq I am sure he could have thought up a million other ways that didn't involve killing over 3000 innocent people.
by Chosun One on August 24th, 2007
Both..
by Sugar-licious a bellydancing rum maiden on March 11th, 2008
No, I don't.
by rodschmidt on October 29th, 2007
The FEMA report said that they had no clue whay Building 7 collapsed. (Of course they didn't phrase it that way.)
So, I am 100% certain that the FEMA report doesn't give us the truth about why Building 7 collapsed, from that alone.
:)
by slothmister on October 4th, 2007
It was defiantly terrorism.
But the US government did know something was coming and I believe they have covered up way more than we know about.
by Halskiisaklink on August 20th, 2007
The US is very good at being secretive, so we'll probably never know. But I wouldn't be surprised, considering that the Pentagon practically invented 'Al Qaeda' by paying people to tell them what they want to hear.
by Cowboy-Matter of Fact on August 20th, 2007
No. It's so ridiculous anyone that would buy into it has a very serious mental problem. It's such a stupid, ignorant, moronic load of crap that it just amazes me that it has taken hold. It is quite disrespectful to the people who died that day. It sickens me that some wackjob America-haters have pushed this load of bull crap and some people have actually bought into it. God help us.
by devil is back on July 24th, 2007
if it was an outside job then the amount of failures happened on that terrible morning of nearly 6 years ago was so enormous that it would have been easier to get the winning ticket at a lottery.
by Patti jo on April 29th, 2007
I have no proof so how can I answer that -- Though it is scary
by Halskiisaklink on March 11th, 2008
Nah, it's more complicated than that. Extreme Islamists aren't these all-evil baddies that the media makes them out to be - they were created. To put it simply, a series of pro-Western capitalist democracies rose in the Arab world during the fifties and sixties, and some Arabs felt that their culture was being eroded by the imported American trash (now, can't we all relate to that?). A lot of crazy, misguided theories about Islam's role in society developed, Islamists asked to be listened to, but the governments refused to listen, partially on the behest of their Western friends. Not being listened to angered the Islamists, and things started getting radical from that point onwards.
So, you could kind of say it was an 'inside job', but whether the idiots currently in office actually know how much their foreign policy directly engineered these events is questionable.
by thekingcobra63 on October 29th, 2007
It was an inside job, by Al Qaeda, and Bin Laden. They were inside the planes. Dirty bastards.
by Drexl on October 28th, 2007
::rolls eyes::
by rodschmidt on October 28th, 2007
I want to know why the beams/girders were cut off at a 45 degree angle in some of the photos. There is NO reason for an ironworker to cut at that angle, it's 40% more work and time than cutting straight across. But it's the perfect angle to cut with explosives, if you want a vertical column to fail.
I am 100% certain the gov't investigations & reports did not get at the truth.
by Roger Kovaciny on October 4th, 2007
A pig like Rosie O'Donnell wasn't ashamed to charge that the government somehow arranged the collapse of the twin towers... hiding explosives or something, I'm a little vague on the quote because she said it a year ago. Fortunately, seismographs do operate in New York, and an explosion of that magnitude would have been recorded by them. It wasn't. The buildings were collapsed because, as Tom Clancy had already written previously in his novel Debt of Honor, an airliner full of fuel makes a very destructive guided missile... and aviation fuel makes all the rugs, curtains, furniture, and papers in an office building burn quite fiercely enough to melt the girders that the building is hung on. (Tall buildings are no longer made out of brick and block; the lower stories would have to be solid brick to support the upper stories. Skyscrapers are building-panels hung on steel girders and columns.)
by The Wade on October 4th, 2007
Sometimes things are just as simple as they look. Sometimes theres just no need to complicate things with conspiracy theories and the like. I'm pretty well convinced it was a terrorist attack and just that. It's really not that complicated sometimes...
by masterplumber75 on January 28th, 2008
Yes all the evidence points to it, NORAD standing down, Marvin Bush head of security until 8:15 a.m. in 911, Jeb Bush declaring martial law in Florida on 9-10, the firefighters who heard explosions in the building, and thousands of other things....
by psychotikid on October 28th, 2007
Go to loosechange.com. It will give you some information that might suprise alot of you about events that occured before, during, and after 9/11.follow instructions and clik on loosechange 2nd edition
by King Beef on August 24th, 2007
bush administration
by mekare on August 20th, 2007
i don't think it was initiated or planned by the US but i do believe that we had enough knowledge of it in plenty of time to stop it, but didn't. so my answer is "yes and no."
by Blink on August 20th, 2007
.........................
by Cleopatra-Queen of Denial on May 4th, 2008
I do not know if it was an inside job but i did hear that the government knew it was going to happen before it did. they just did not feel there was a credible threat. After they were warned.
by Boycott on May 4th, 2008
I just can't believe that Benladan from the caves of Afganestan could guide such a huge plan! The only terroristic plan he can handle is kidnaping and cutting the throat of innocent people in Afganestan and Iraq/-
by meagin on May 3rd, 2008
Who knows, anything is possible. We have so much corruptions in our governments now it's easy to believe there could be some truth these theories somewhere along the line.
by zaqes1 on April 3rd, 2008
In my opinion, it would not be hard for the U.S. Gov. to conspire to crash two jets into the WTC's. But. if you think that the WTC were brought down by the meens of "implosion", You have to be crazy! Have you ever watch these shows on the Discovery channel or similair? These major demolition companies have to carefully and perfectly place these explosives in just the right structual points on a building. and they do this after a building is stripped of thier internal walls, exposing the exact area to be exploded. They can't just toss a back pack full of explosives in a janitors closet. It would take a crew of workers, constantly coming and going, in and out of offices, with tools and materials, going in and out of the building. constantly disturbing the office workers, making them leave thier office rooms so that they can work. After a while, people would talk to each other. And the crew of workers that were to be doing this would have to be trusted this whole time not to talk or screw up some how. Plus if you have ever seen a large building being imploded, you always can see some flash point where the explosive are being ignited, also all of the explosives would have to be set off by wireless remote detination. Unless you think that there was a bunch of terrorist suicide bombers with thier own back packs running around the WTC. Timing would have to be perfect. I just find it a lot easier to fly two jets and take my chances...my opinion...
by Anonymous on April 3rd, 2008
Absolutely. Bin Laden had the funds and connections to shut down the buildings for hours at a time and plant explosives to bring the buildings down. You are severely misguided if you think this was because of 'bin laden', the government is corrupt and something needs to be done. Never underestimate your opponent - the government.
by Eltinwe has a life Swan - DYOH on March 11th, 2008
Nope.
An inside job would have been just as spectacular, but with far fewer casualties. It's the spectacle that matters for the public opinion, not the number of people who die, and VERY few terrorist attacks are that effective. It's just not plausible that it was an inside job.
There are OTHER government type "conspiracy theories" I tend to lend more credence to, but not this one.
by Anonymous on March 11th, 2008
No ! Not even for a second .
by JAMMco... its complicated... on March 11th, 2008
No. I don't lend much weight to any conspiracy theories.
by RsoiCoach on February 3rd, 2008
Loose Change 2nd Edition Answers This Question
link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288
by rodschmidt on October 29th, 2007
Close your eyes and repeat after me:
CIA terrorists would never do a black-op on American soil.
Politicians would never murder or start wars to get more power.
If there were a few hundred people involved in a mass murder, surely one of them would have let it slip (not caring about being rubbed out by his fellow murderers), and I would have read about it in the newspapers.
If you believe CIA terrorists did it, then you're being disrespectful to the victims, but if you believe Arab terrorists did it, that's respectful.
CIA terrorists are no more efficient or artful than Post Office employees.
If it had been an inside job, then there would have been clues and discrepancies, and I would have read about them on a website somewhere.
by gerry h on July 24th, 2007
it was an out side job
by unknown on April 29th, 2007
If by inside you mean inside Al Queda then yes I do.
by itinary on September 29th, 2009
It is an inside job by Alquida.. they are right there in the american soil.
by Big Dan on September 8th, 2009
Yes Alex Jones told me everything
by Anonymous on May 2nd, 2009
i could never believe that.
by leoarce on September 3rd, 2008
i think the people who don't believe it was an inside job are the conspiracy theorists.
by American4FreeHealth on September 1st, 2008
Of course it was, it is the biggest lie to ever face this nation. Thank your local CIA members.
by maS elcnU on June 26th, 2008
Not all the involved persons are Americans. A conspiracy orchestated by the international elite.
My 2 cents.
by Faust ARP on May 28th, 2008
NO.
by Ec-nal Licensed Bootie Inspector on May 4th, 2008
No I don't, nor do I think Pearl Harbor, JFK's assassination or the existence of UFO's are conspiracies yo...
Why is ground zero called that?
by Answerbag Staff on March 26th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
do you believe 100% that the US gov and the bush admin are the ones behind the destruction of WTC tower in the 9/11 attack?
by ctopz666 on October 22nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Aside fr lives lost, are you glad the World Trade Center Towers are gone? Were they "like knives in the liver of the city.." as Dardon sd?
by GibsonGuy on October 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
On 9/11, about 3000 Americans were killed in the WTC attack and the US attacked Iraq. Should we attack McDonald's now?
by Piano Player on December 17th, 2011
| 2 people like this
True or false? World Trade Center Bldg 7 - which was not hit, but fell anyway - had all the records for the gov to use to prosecute Enron.
by purplecows on December 19th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Do you think 9-11 was an inside job?
- which can also be phrased in the following ways:
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
i'd like to belive that but the truth is that there are thousands of well traind well armed suicidal brainwased bastards out there who want to destroy are way of life and we have to confront and destroy them.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 3rd, 2008
what media do you use Booze Hound? May I suggest you change it?
by freeluncher on May 4th, 2008
I many forms of media includeing msn,the sun,the express and the bbc(or the labour fan club)as i like to call them.I think some people are scared of the threat that the islamic nations and the terrorist they fund pose so they'ed rather cling to far fetched conspiricy theorys.People are greedy and our govenments are inefficent,do you realy think they could pull this off without some one leaking it to the press,the story would be worth millions.I dont beleive the people in power are clever enouth to pull it off,I do beleive a few twisted idervisuals are capperble of see a gap in airline sercurity and useing it to kill.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 4th, 2008
Boozehound, I think you have a lot to learn about the bloody history of US, and UK involvement in the Middle East. May I suggest this - http://www.counterpunch.org/fisk02152003.html.
by freeluncher on May 5th, 2008
I know theres along running history beetween the middle east and the west but were talking about 9/11 and the events since then so if you could stay"on topic" it would help.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 5th, 2008
you are right, sorry aboot going off topic to all. (good article nonetheless).
Anyway, yeah, 9/11, I have ma doubts about the official version, but I don't think aliens did it lol
by freeluncher on May 5th, 2008
i'm sure it was i'll read it when i get a chance,yeah i dont blame anyone for doubting but the evidence suppots the govenment so at the moment i beleive them.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 5th, 2008
Ah but dear chap, I think the evidence also suggests that the government are serial liars. This is the bind I suppose.
by freeluncher on May 5th, 2008
read what desiger has to say on answer 7 and get back to me.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 5th, 2008
what designer says is all fine and dandy, but doesn't explain to me where NORAD was that morning, why no Air Force jets were scrambled. Do you remember the golfer Payne Stewart and the accident he had at the wheel of a plane pre-9/11?
by freeluncher on May 5th, 2008
freeluncher, i would like to know, from you, if you would please tell me - what did happen to golfer Payne Stewart in a plane pre-9/11?
by xqq on May 28th, 2008
Payne Stewart died in a crash in his own private jet in 1999. The plane strayed off course, and was very quickly 'buzzed' by a US air force jet who had been alerted to it's non-planned movement. I often wonder why none of the planes on 9/11 were "buzzed" in a similar way.
http://www.airsafe.com/stewart.htm
by freeluncher on May 29th, 2008
because humans ARE'NT PERFECT and sometimes they make mistakes,that does'nt mean theres a conspirisy we need to stop thinking up crazy conspiricy theorys and consentrate on the real enermy which is al quida and similar groups.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 29th, 2008
Booze Hound, the official version of what happened on 9/11 is a conspiracy theory too, for pete's sake. Bin Laden and co, sitting in a cave CONSPIRING to blow up New York. Whatever the truth of is 9/11, it was the result of a conspiracy by SOMEONE! Saying conspiracy theory is just daft - it's stating the bleedin' obvious! The official story has too many holes in it, and a guy with your intelligence Booze Hound, must be able at least to ackowledge that.
by freeluncher on May 29th, 2008
They were warned,and as arrogant as thoes in the know acted...it's clear they were wrong.
by Pistachio on July 30th, 2009
the official version is the truth,the u.s government is arrogant and did'nt react in time and the result was 9/11 the only reason these thoerys exist is because the wars in afganistan and iraq are unpopular if the general puplic suppoted the wars these thorys would never have got off the ground.the u.s govenment failed to protect it's people and the terrorists saw there chance and took it.for some reason i did'nt get a message when you commented freeluncher
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on July 31st, 2009