If you had to live without arms or legs which would you choose?
by 
Nate the Great
ANSWERS: 6
-
Legs--at least I could still do things for myself.
-
Legs, they invented this thing called a wheelchair, you can go anywhere you want without even using your legs, you should try it. You do everything with your hands/arms, without them I don;t think I could live.
-
Definitely legs. I could cope with the limitations of having no legs more so than not having any arms.
-
Cut my legs of if you must. I will get by. I will be able to receive a lot of government charity and I could be able to work the system. I could have some really interesting sex; just imagine.
-
I'd rather do with out my arms....doesn't look like a popular choice from what I see...but not being able to get around on my own would really suck....as far as my arms....if I give up one testicle....can I keep one arm?? Just wondering!
-
legs, don't want someone else to wipe my arse
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC