ANSWERS: 14
-
Not
-
It's a failed weapon if it is. Less than 1% death rate. +5
-
A real biological weapon would be much more deadly.
-
LMAO.
-
man made for sure, weapon doubtful
-
No, it's just a mutation. They happen. It would be a really pointless biological weapon if it was though. It's almost the same as normal flu. In fact normal flu has a higher death rate. +3
-
If you start growing a tail it is..
-
I heard it was man made.Don't know anything else about it.Or if that was even true. They won't tell us anyway. Gotta love the government right?
-
Could be. But may not be effective.
-
I have no idea..imo, it could easily be either one. I can see how our vaccines and overpopulation and such can create superflus and stuff...but I have to admit, I can see many applications and reasons for the powers that be to design and use such a thing.
-
I doubt it. it does not appear to be virulent enough to be a weapon. Why produce a weapon that kills in tens or hundreds per month.
-
when h1n1 mutates to h5n1 then it becomes affective as a biological weapon look what happened in the ukraine , light air craft was seen spraying aerosols over the part of the ukraine that was affected a day or two before people started dying also a couple of the light aircraft was forced to land by the ukraine air force +3
-
Not the flu. I'm more inclined to think there is something up with the vaccine.
-
Yeah...of it's own making.
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 