by 
ANSWERS: 51
-
O_o That's really no better than being a murderer.
-
Of course not. But I do believe that the whole issue should be truly examined and debated.
-
What would that solve? All it would do is make the person who did the murdering break one of the 10 Commandments. And face a jail term. And (if you are opposed to abortions) make the murderer no better than the abortionist. It's just a stupid concept and people who believe that it is a good thing have something wrong in their brains. "Two wrongs don't make a right." Etc.
-
Not at all.
-
asking for more death will solve nothing, more effort should be put into legal and political challenges, how can someone defend the life of an unborn child, then demand the life of another human being?
-
Sometimes...but then I quickly think that would not solve anything but only join in the killing.. :-/
-
That's kind of harsh. They should stop giving abortions though.
-
I think they should get medals of honor and this is coming from a fetal point of view :)
-
Yes No.. thats a harsh reaction dont you think? im against abortion..but i think there is OBviously a more reasonable solution
-
Killing is wrong! Let's kill people to show that killing is wrong!! Wait.... Oops...
-
NO
-
We should not judge others, God is the Only Authority to do so. But the bible does state "An eye for an eye".
-
Wow, that wouldn't teach them much, would it? I think they should be prevented from gaining monetarily from killing babies. Let's see how many abortions they do for free.
-
No of course not. Abortion is wrong because it is murder, it's even worse to murder a fully developed human being. They need to repent and leave that practice behind.
-
a very religion close friend of mine told me that in some cases the doctors were forced to give them or they would loose their license. and that some doctors even quit.
-
There are those who think life is worth saving. I respect that! But those same people cannot decide WHEN cells become LIFE! Why is the death of an abortionist better than the "might be"? Of the abortions performed, could one of them be the next Hitler? Or Stalin? Or BTK? These people think of lives saved if abortion weren't legal, but who would raise these people? State run facilities! Who would teach caring? There isn't enough to go around now! Instead of killing abortion performing Dr.'s, how come these people aren't adopting children, and raising them with good values?
-
No they should not. That is a bit drastic. +5
-
No, but apparently some so called pro lifers do.
-
Isn't that rather like screwing for virginity? : )
-
Any woman considering an abortion should be executed on the spot!
-
Is this another idea that comes from this FREE country?
-
No i don't, there are very few instances i think abortion should be legal, but there are a few. 1 if the womans life is endangered by this birth. 2 if the baby is way way abnormal and they see this, then i would say it is up to the woman. 3 if a woman gets raped, or is raped by her father or brother or such. Again even in these situations its up to the woman, most of the time though even in these situations, the child could be given up for adoption, but it could be the case that it would cause so much mental trama for the women to carry her fathers or a rapist's baby, that she might kill herself before she has it. Like i said in some cases It should be done, so to sum it up, i will say it again, NO they should not be murdered.
-
No, I do not think they should be murdered. Anti-choice zealots that bomb, murder and assist those who do are domestic terrorist who should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
-
Not only murdered, but publicly executed. Drawn and quartered. The whole shabang.
-
Treat them no differently than any other killer.
-
Ow yes - and eaten too. Please! Get real here! Of course not!
-
I dont agree with abortion, but I do not hold it against anyone who has gotten one. I do not think they should be murdered, the same as I dont think a baby should be murdered. -
I think they should be decent human beings by treating the unborn like they were treated. The Golden Rule should be a law.
-
No.
-
You are sounding like Nick. Please don't be another Nick! One is more then enough!
-
LOL i bet your mind is a scary scary place
-
Tried for murder maybe but not murdered. You would be putting yourself on their level which would not be acceptable.
-
Two wrongs do not make a right. Death will not bring about greater respect for life.
-
Nope. And nobody in their right mind thinks that either.
-
Why? Abortion is legal.
-
No, you are talking about an illegal act for a legal action. Regardless of your moral and religious principles, others have a right to theirs also.
-
No. +5
-
That's like the pot calling the kettle black right?
-
I think it's their buissness and no one elses. Save you're effort, time and energy for something else. +2
-
It would have been best if they had been aborted.
-
No.
-
They are earning a living legally. The problem is in the law.
-
Hmmmmm...... should we murder doctors? For some reason that just doesn't seem to be too cunning!
-
No. Life in prison with no possibility of parole.
-
About as much as I think people who ask if they should should be.
-
No, I don't think that they should be murdered. I do think that they should be considered by rational people as murderers.
-
I dont think so. I think people who give abortions, should just not have sex at all, because if they dont want to have any kids, then stay with your legs closed!!! I just think they need to learn. Seriously, why take an innocent life who still hasnt seen the spot of light. Even if you think you may not do no harm because it is still not born, then think about it this way. How would you feel if someone tried killing you while you slept? Would you care? (For those who has or is planning to have an abortion) COMPLETELY AGAINST ABORTION!
-
NO...God says it's a sin for me to judge others & that is HIS job. So, I don't judge & I leave it up to God to decide!!!
-
-
Linda Joy No He didn't! That's not anywhere in The Bible. If you think it is then quote me scripture and verse. -
bostjan the adequate 🥉 Maybe James 4:11-12.
-
Majik-1 Matthew 7:1-3 King James Version 7.1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
-
Linda Joy He is saying how you judge others determines how you will be judged. It does not say JUDGING IS A SIN. You have to judge others . You have to judge them when you are hiring a baby sitter or any other employee for that matter. Its saying judge fairly. Never does it say "JUDGING IS A SIN". You have to judge people if you are considering going into business together or whether you want to marry someone, or if you are considering loaning them money or your car. Or even choosing players on a team. Life is full of judging and if you think you don't judge, you're wrong!!
-
Majik-1 How many of those people are you planning on murdering???
-
bostjan the adequate 🥉 I think that's an interesting side discussion about what is considered a sin and what is not, but that's likely best a different discussion thread. And it doesn't sound to me like Linda Joy is advocating violence. I think questioning the logic used to reach a conclusion should not imply embracing the opposite conclusion.
-
Linda Joy Can't admit you were wrong, Majik? That's fine, but your desperation is showing here.
-
Linda Joy No I don't embrace the opposite. They should be punished according to the current law. And a discussion on religion is fine when people are looking for the truth, or interpret something differently than I do, even if they disagree. But I don't intend to defend God against an atheist that just wants to argue (Not saying you do, but I don't think you are looking to understand and embrace the law of God.) It just opens good people up to being attacked because of Anti-Christian sentiment. For some reason anti-Semitic stereotypes are prohibited, but you can attack Christians all you want an no one cares. Even if they enforced the forbidding of personal attacks it would probably be resolved, but they don't. Actually I'm not sure anyone is working here anymore.
-
-
No. Murder does not resolve anything. It makes matters worse and the person must live feeling guilty of their actions. Abortion is the same as murder because the baby no longer lives. Abortion is for women with anger issues and they do not think of giving the baby to an adoption agency. To murder a woman who aborts her baby has the same consequence. Anyone who murders someone else regardless of the age of the victim should live with guilt. There is a lot of killing going on in the real world which contributes to problems going on. You would have to be immoral to kill anyone and you would deserve to be alone.
-
France has abortion on demand. Since 1962 it has been involved in ZERO wars. The United States on the other hand has been involved in at least Six, depending how you count them. Given that information I think France's reluctance to go to war is proof of its higher regard for human life.
-
-
bostjan the adequate 🥉
It's all semantics. Instead of fighting in "war," young French men go off to fight in "operations," like "Operation Serval," or "Operation Barkhane," or whatever. The USA technically does the same semantic shell game by saying that the Iraq war was "Operation Iraqi Freedom" or whatever. Ultimately, though, France's military is still the 5th or 6th largest in the world, and France is more than happy to wave them off to fight foreigners in their home countries. France has been involved in nearly every rebellion/civil war involving it's former African colonies, such as the Shaba Wars, the Ivory Coast Civil War, the Wars in Western Sahara, the Chad Civil War, the Djibouti Civil War, etc., and also the Haitian Rebellion more recently. Even Corsica, still part of French Territory, rebelled against France since 1962, leading to a short-lived war. Ultimately, though, France is not much different from the USA in terms of getting involved as the world's police. -
Beat Covid, Avoid Republicans
I didn't know that. Thanks for the info.
-
-
Its a woman's body. Her choice. No doctor who performs an abortion should be murdered or for that matter, the woman. However the choice can be to continue the pregnancy. That certainly is a choice too. A fetus incompatible with life, women's life at stake for me are valid reasons for abortion. I'd include incest ie sibling, first, second cousin pregnancies.. The bottom line is pro choice can include anti abortion since that is a woman's choice. Anti choice ie pro life can't include pro-choice.
HoboJoe 
Thriftymaid 
Shadow Of The Mind RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC