- NEW!
by Rufus_T_Firefly on September 25th, 2009
Much, much worse off than it was at the end of his first and second terms.
by Inmigrant on September 25th, 2009
asking third world countries for help...
by thatsJustme on September 25th, 2009
better than present....
by Robertd903 on September 25th, 2009
...let's see:
Gas would probably top $5.00/gal on the average;
People would start to sneak into MEXICO--for a better life;
The ONE DOLLAR BILL--would probably be scarcely used, much like the PENNY. (Although, there wouldn't much difference in value!)
by Factotum on September 25th, 2009
I'm going to hazard that it would be slightly better but not what you'd call golden.
by Marguerite on September 25th, 2009
What happened in Sweden and Iceland---the government had to take over all the banks.
by Moongrim on September 26th, 2009
We would've improved to the point that we'd forgotten many of the sacrifices needed to get to said point.
by buxtonite ..slowly losing my mind on September 25th, 2009
there wouldn't be ANY financial structure left at all... well third world countries would need one anyway and thats what the U.S. would have become, bloody Zimbabwe would have been the richest country on earth compaired to the U.S.
by tominhouston on September 25th, 2009
It would probably be the same or worse. We're dealing with Nancy Pelocis, Harry Reeds, Barney Franks, Christopher Dodds, Maxine Waters and Max Baucuses. Ah who knows - I think we need to go green and recycle the Congress.
by Normal guy on September 25th, 2009
It is a moot question. GWB would never have been elected for a second time in order to preside over a third term.
by President Norris 2016 on September 25th, 2009
The same, we have the same federal chairman to make the important decisions
by Tallyman on September 25th, 2009
Much better. We'd probably have about 4.5% unemployment instead of almost 10%.
We wouldn't have the threat of a probable 20-30% unemployment hanging over our heads if cap-n-trade goes through.
by KimKfromAbseconNJ on September 25th, 2009
We'd be SCREWED!
Especially those on a fixed income.
by EmptyWallet on September 25th, 2009
We'd be possibly in the same shape, but we'd have alot more HOPE then we do now...
by Anonymous on September 25th, 2009
Ever read the book (or see the movie) "Watchmen" by Alan Moore?
It would be like that, except we wouldn't have Dr. Manhattan to bail our collective asses out when things went south.
What do George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have in common with Adolf Hitler, Usama bin Laden and Charles Manson?
by calicorey on June 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Should George W. Bush be prosecuted for murder?
by purplecows on May 30th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Is the double-santa claus theory a pretty good summation of GW Bush´s terms in office?
by n1kkigirl on June 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why Vincent Bugliosi couldnt get no mainstream media play to talk about his published book The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder?
by Iceander on May 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
America was really very safe from terrorism before george w bush?
by greenbackfrog on May 7th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading If George W. Bush had been allowed to run for a third presidential term and won, in what economic state would the United States financial structure be in at this point?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments