What am I considered? I don't believe in god, or any religion, but i'm not saying that there is nothing spritual or some force, but there might not be, I mostly believe that there is some type of balance going on.
by 
Romiex69x
ANSWERS: 15
-
You would be agnostic it sounds.
-
You really don't have to call yourself anything. Agnostic means "a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience." (dictionary.com) Do you feel that describes your view of creation, life, spirituality? It doesn't sound quite like that to me - it sounds to me as though you are going in the direction of finding answers in the laws of nature (balance). So the question is what you consider yourself. Maybe you are a seeker - someone who observes, learns and questions and enjoys that process. You say you don't know but aren't ruling certain things out; you are learning and withholding judgment at this time. I think defining yourself, rather than letting others label you, is important.
-
Look into Deism. In this model god created the Earth and the universe and then abandoned it all or has taken a rather long break from the action. Deists eschew things like divine revalation and organized religions. Wikipedia says that "deists hold that religious beliefs must be founded on human reason and observed features of the natural world, and that these sources reveal the existence of one God or supreme being." Now it's not for me. I just can't get past that whole Supreme Being thing but if I HAD to believe in one god, the Deist version sounds really well-conceived (and in my book all gods are conceived by people). Useful links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism http://www.deism.com/
-
Ah, already wise in your years. Keep looking, the balance is within. You need not wear a label.
-
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/76/story_7665_1.html go there its a REALLY long test but will give you about 20 religions you COULD be and the definitions of each
-
What would I be called - I believe that anything is possible, but that following anything blindly is foolish. Open minded I suppose! :) we don't really need to label ourselves.
-
Agnostic.
-
Do you really want to be put in a box? Then it might be a freethinker, agnostic, maybe even an atheist. Depends on your view. But really, do you want to be labeled?
-
Not saying there isn't, but there might not be...? Not trying to be an ass, but you sound confused to me. If you don't believe in God but do believe in the supernatural, you are Spiritual. If you don't even believe that, I'd call you a Flatlander. But that's only a definition I've been using for people who refuse to see any sort of spiritual reality.
-
well...i don't see you as a 'free thinker'...i don't see you as an 'open minded' thinker...i don't see you as an 'independant thinker' ....soooooooooo, i guess i see you as a person who lacks the ability to think for himself ..lacks convictions ......can't balance themselves...so ...........unbalanced ,maybe?limited thinking abilities? an unbalanced,limited, unconcerned ,person..... hey!!! u asked ...u have nothing to balance on and no real desire to....just 'hanging' in the balance....
-
Whatever you wish to be considered... But I'd suggest starting with at least "Rational" +5
-
Agnostic or like me... You just know better.
-
Agnostic, if you also conclude that you just do your best to lead a good life.
-
Perhaps a nasceant Bhuddist.
-
You are Agnostic.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC