How convinced are you that the universe did OR did not have an intelligent creator, and why? ---- (Where 100% = completely convinced it did . . . . Where 0% = completely convinced it did NOT)
by 
Franklin
ANSWERS: 9
-
About 1% I'm not going to delude myself into thinking "I absolutely KNOW there is no creator God". But supporting evidence? There isn't any. All there typically is, is alleged holes in scientific theories. It's all "negative evidence". There is nothing to actually positively suggest that there is a creator God - from any specific religion - other than the obviously biased accounts made BY those religions: "OUR holy book says OUR God created the universe. End of story." Sure. Presumptuous, much?
-
0.1% because a creator makes no sense.
-
100. Nothing approaching the level of complexity and requisite organization of the cosmos, to include the development and organization of things such as the laws of physics, radiance (light) and mathematics, has ever been observed that did not require tremendous intelligence to create.
-
100% it did. Everything fits together like was planned and created that way. I is inconceivable to me that this is all by chance. I am a creationists who believes in evolution and the creator was/is God.
-
100% sure that it does have a creator (the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob)Why? Something from nothing, by nothing (non creator) or Something from nothing, by God.
-
I say 0% but only as a measure of how convinced I am that there was an intelligent creator. I am not completely convinced anything "did NOT" as you put it, but I am completely UNconvinced, as this is the default position of a rational mind having observed no evidence to begin to convince it.
-
I'll say 10% + or - about 9.99999 :-) There is evidence that specifically points to such an intelligence. If there is something capable of creating a universe in all it's beautiful detail it would probably be less comprehensible to us than the sum of human accopmlishment is to a single synapse. Therefore assuming such a thing does exists strikes me as a bit silly and useless. And label, such as "intelligent", we were to put on it would be so far short of the mark as to be meaningless. +5
-
y a w n.
-
There is nothing leading me to believe that this intelligence has a conscience. Intelligence is a self-manifesting phenomena that cares not for right or wrong, good or bad. There are no rational in it being a supreme being and nothing to say there are not smarter life forms than us. Every life form is a thread of that intelligence that is moulded by it's environment. Simply life forms make it to geometric symmetry perfection. Naturally occurring mathematics have created laws on which our reality rests were created by this self-manifesting intelligence. It is like an invisible force like gravity . As humans our arrogance lead us to believe that this was all made for us, it is sad. I believe our thread of intelligence is here to whiteness it all. From the outer reaches to the quarks we are the only thing that has the ability to do that. We are basically the catalyst in this formula.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC