by 
andblack
ANSWERS: 7
-
For what? Peacekeeping? (ha!) Overseeing & enforcing sanctions? (haha!) Supporting peace & democracy? (hahaha!) Conducting & evaluating sound science? (HAHAHAHA!) I think not.
-
lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol I'm sorry, you got me at just the right moment...
-
no..
-
There are some branches of the U.N. I have more trust in than others, but the U.N. is vastly under-resourced, ineffective and restricted by the choices of its members. Many of whom are far less trustworthy than even our own governments, and are the most corrupt states in the world. Short answer, no. That doesn't mean I want rid of it though.
-
No, especially now, It can get very crazy after 2009.
-
No, for all we now they are sitting on thir bums and doing nothing. You can't trust any of these now.
-
Not in the slightest. I happen to know they are operating death camps for my people. No, I am not speaking without proof. Here is proof (scroll down for the videos, including from the camps themselves): http://proudromani.blogspot.com/2009/01/un-deathcamps-for-roma-children.html If they are doing this, what else are they doing?
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC