by 
Daevid
ANSWERS: 45
-
It does, in MY "book," because, as it is written, "the banana did NOT self-create," so it is perfectly logical to assume that something must have caused the banana to come into existence, if it did not "self-create." +5
-
Nope. It all comes down to you beliefs. I believe there is a God. That's my opinion of course.
-
Alone? As if logic proves god. God cannot be proved or disproved logically.Belief in God is pure faith. Nothing wrong with that.
-
Do you mean the fact that we as humans have the ability to use logic proves there is a higher being?? Or by using logic can we prove there is a god?? Just trying to clarify.
-
I think there is actually more logic against there being a god.
-
Hi:):) I just don't know what else would of caused such a Big Bang..I get the Theory:) What I don't understand is how did everything be rotating one way at this exact speed and timing..that it created something like this:)
-
Nope. But the Jews and the Pope and most Islamics now have countries of their own. The Dali Lama does not. No definition of God -- no country. A coincidence?
-
No, logic alone does not prove or deny the existence of a creator. All we can truly and honestly admit about the beginning (if there was one) is that it is currently beyond human understanding.
-
It depends on the axioms you accept. For example, both Anselm's and Aquinas' proofs of God's existance do follow necessarily from their premises and axioms. Their premises have been shown to be true. So that just leaves the axioms. But by definition you can't prove an axiom.
-
Only a twisted logic that starts with some incorrect assumptions. To say that logic proves the existence of a supreme being that caused the universes, but which itself has no cause, and is not constrained by the physical laws of the universe it created is farcical. We pretty much know how our universe got to be, how it is today, “IF” god created it, he did so around 15 billion years ago by causing the “big bang, after waiting an eternity for some reason or other. Just because we truly don’t know what triggered the “big Bang”, though there are some very plausible theories, is no reason to say god did it, this is what is called “the god gap theory”. To answer what caused one event with an even more unexplainable one is preposterous. and far from logical. Logic I would say is heavily weighed toward god Not existing. purely because Lack of evidence for something is evidence for the lack of it.
-
No. It takes some physical proof. http://godisimaginary.com/
-
Well, is evolution logic? When you look at discoveries, it is not. It hasn't been proven. There are things Scientist will not release because it proves there is a God. Like how our blood cells are held together by something that is in the shape of a cross. Science proves God exsits than it does evolution.
-
Depends on who you are talking to! What I don't understand is--Believers and well as NON believers generally accept the fact (whether they believe it or not) that "God" is believed to be a supreme being, and creator of the universe. If "God" does NOT exist, how is it possible to have two OPPOSITE sides of the argument AGREE with these "characteristics?"
-
What religion did your parents have? Do you follow the same? Why? Is it a coincidence that almost everyone is following the religion their parents did? And it ALWAYS happens to be the right religion! If you had lived in ancient Greece you would have worshipped Zeus and Apollo, in Egypt you would have prayed to Ra, as a Viking it would have been Thor and there are countless examples of ancient religions that one could quote where one by one those ancient belief systems and their "gods" vanished.... and we are getting on just fine without them. No doubt you would claim everyone of those gods were delusions, so give me one good reason why YOUR god and not someone else's is the real one. Seems as though logic alone cannot prove anything about the existance of a god.
-
Mary, you are only half understanding the evolution thing, Humans did not evolve from monkeys, this is something the church keeps flinging at the theory to try and ridicule it. Both Humans and Monkeys have a common ancestor, way back, there have been (and there is plenty of evidence) several hominid species this link will give you more detail than i can type here: http://www.biology-online.org/10/14_early_hominids.htm As for the dating of evidence, this is not even up for debate, it is a fact that several ways to confirm the date of a given artefact are reliable and unquestionable. Again arguments have been used to try and say that the system is flawed, these argument are mainly against carbon dating, and this system dose not work well if the test material has very little or no carbon, other methods can then be utilised. Can I just ask, Are you denying the existence of dinosaurs and probably everything else older than about 6,000 years old.
-
proof is beyond ANY reasonable doubt, so know. Put both side in a criminal court and neither can be proven of disproven. In a civil court (US) both side would have to be ruled in favor for by a preponderance of evidence
-
Opps mistake.
-
Logic alone proves that since the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven by logic, it must be accepted that it is possible that He exists. The burden of proof is on the side that wishes to disprove his existence.
-
no
-
It really depends on what you mean by prove. If you are asking can logic prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that there is a God. Your answer would be no. People will always doubt. I think you can show logical arguments that conclude that there is a God. To me these arguments prove there is a God. Not everyone agrees however. See http://www.principiatheologica.wordpress.com
-
I would think logic would prove the opposite.
-
Whaddabout "The Ontological Argument", posited by St. Anselm? = - 1. God is the entity of which nothing greater can be thought. 2. It is greater to be necessary than not. 3. God must therefore be necessary. 4. Hence, God exists necessarily. - Yeah, yeah, I know it's 12th century ancient & "disproven", etc., etc., but still really cool, huh? ;-)
-
Logically, how does one prove the unknown?
-
If anything, it'd prove there is no god. You can't prove it either way, but logic was never a friend of god or religion.
-
There is no logic need to be in a religion or to believe in a god. The reason being that there is no evidence of a god or an after life. It's based on fear, guilt, greed and control of the masses. Mostly it's a lot of fairy tales designed to scare people into doing what they are told.
-
For me, having no creator would be illogical. However, I don't think you can definitely prove either side of the argument, and I think God designed it that way. He wants you to come to him through a "leap of faith".
-
The concept god cannot exist without it's opposite - whatever that is for you. For every "One" there is "Not One". The choices are narrowing fast. Can you live in just not knowing? Is that a knowing too? Go ahead, fall right off the edge. It is not a logical thing to do when there is so much, so important to solve here. ;-) Thanks!
-
I think our logic is...only as good as the incomplete puzzle we humans always have. Doesn't sound very convincing does it? No, I don't think so, for what one person says, another may seemingly perfectly refute it...
-
Hi Dmitri, not trying to sound rude, but can you rephrase what you said? I read it twice and I can't figure out if you are for or against evolution.
-
Dude, the words "logic" and "god" should never be in the sentence unless there is a "NO" before "logic"
-
Ok, i thought about it and Ive got it! If you think that science and modern technology is the work of Satan then yes the ark has been found! If not then there is no evidence of the ark yet.
-
Just the oposite.
-
Yes.
-
logic prove there is a god only if you allow yourself to know what god is about, a great and best way to start is to read the bible. cause a lot of logic people use is why? why do god allow us suffer? or why do he let us die? why dont he show himself? why dont he save me? all these question's can be answered if you know what god is about, god is not a superhero, and you cannot use logic about a being you know nothing or little about.
-
no...it is by faith
-
Logic, and scientific facts, do the opposite they prove there is no god, but ppl who belive in god say its not about facts its about faith, which in my personal opinion is just a cover up excuse for that fact the only proof they have for god is a book where as science has prooven facts and fossils millions of years older than the bible. I'm agnostic so please dont think im just knocking religion i do belive there is more to life than "facts" this is merely a neurtal opinion.
-
Good God, NO! There isn't any logic to support the notion of god.
-
The age old question, and litter on AB, as far as I'm concerned Well 'proof' is beyond any shadow of a doubt in my mind, so, no If both sides of the argument were put before a US criminal court, neither could be proven in this context If both were put before a US civil court where the burden of 'proof' is more likely than not both would have to be given merit as true. 'Proof' to me is something I can touch and is completly irrefutable
-
To whom or to what will you turn in your time of need. It is sad that if one does different from you...that it not right in your eyes. You think you are right and that is fine...but to insult others...because their source of strength comes from above and not from that which you approve of...is not right.
-
Proofs of Existence of God http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz1IrqgDhjI Why we should believe in God - by Khalid Yassin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DPutYhuBUk Evolution and God? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of3_CxOnLoU&feature=PlayList&p=CB72A0C200B18E7C&index=12 Is faith in the Unseen illogical and unscientific? WHY SCIENCE FAILS TO EXPLAIN GOD? http://www.a1realism.com/ENGLISH/BASIC/Unseen_illogical.htm YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN http://www.freewebs.com/katab/10th.htm ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE http://www.freewebs.com/katab/3rd.htm ***************** http://quranexplorer.com/ http://islamtomorrow.com/ http://www.forsanelhaq.com/en/showthread... Quran Miracles encyclopdia http://www.55a.net/firas/en1/
-
Mary you are quoting lies made by creationists to try and support there bullshit see below for details http://stupiddinosaurlies.org/2008/12/01/the-pseudo-dragons-of-genesis-park-part-10/ Mary scientific findings and theories are always under scrutiny. There are a few unanswerd questions with regards to evolution, but nothing that makes the theory unworkable. As for nothing in the bible being found false. You are having a laugh. maybe you did not read this well enough http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/1.html link above anyalizes and rips the bible to shreds. showes it for the nonscense it really is. starting with genisis read it properly and tell me where the bible stands up well to investigation?
-
Honestly...I think it does, I see way to much logic. In all things I see it to be 100% proof and logic. BUT...thats not the way everyone sees it. I suppose its on perspective, and what you want to see.
-
Actually, yes. There are written history recorods of Jesus's miracles and his reserection. Also, in the rocords, people witnessed it all. You may be thinking, Oh, they are just hulisinating. Is it when 100s of people have the same hulitionation? Also, most civilizations survives when they are Christian based. I doubt it was a coincidence when someone could've blessed them.
-
why do we all talk about some thing that doesnt exsist, it must , its the most talked and thought about thing there is, what ever created us ? we must at least, respect!
-
No...as others have said it is by faith and by coming to your own decision on how the world operates. If logic could prove it we would not have this debate. However I do believe that God reveals Himself to everyone during their life time, again not through logic but through revelation. It is up to us to accept or reject Him.
Moongrim RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC