Lonliness, drugs, curiousity, coercion, perversity, etc.

In our USA survey (of 300 men, and 300 women), 86% of women were clean of drugs, not lonely, and had no significant psychological factors. 90% of men were the same as the 86% humans were. This was bestiosexuals and zoosexuals. 75% of the men said they were in a loving relationship with their animals, and were hence, zoosexual. And 72% of the women said they were in a loving relatioship with their animals, and were hence, zoosexual. And even the famous Peter Singer backed it, after seeing the evidence. According to bioethnics, we'd be better off dying out, than commit intra-specific incest, that's if we don't commit bestiality, at least with a relative species. Our DNA is becoming weak and feeble, and for mankind to continue surviving, it needs to commit to at least relative inter-species procreation; scientists are working hard to pull antidotes for cancer, etc from human-animal embryos, but are failing when they go any further than stem cell research; because the womb is the best development centre. What's the point of 'in-vitro', apart from the inexistence of men? Stupid idea, invented by sexist lesbians (who hate men), etc. We found in the Oxytocin tests, that the actual sexual organs were turned on by animal porn, much more, than opposed to non-animal porn; and that they preferred specific species (the ones they were with). 94% of the main survey men participated in that survey, and it was revealed that they all liked the preferential pornography more, than the kind that opposed their own preference. 80% of the main survey women participated in that survey, and it was revealed that they all liked the preferential pornography more, than the kind that opposed their own preference. Kinsey reports this is similar to homosexuality, and hence, we must give zoosexuality its own orientation. The men and women came from various backgrounds, and some had a good history of education and family life, just like others; and their social interaction was high, so it is wrong to call them lonely, as composed by the figures in the upper article. Only 13% of the men and women (together) had DID or similar in early life; and only 20% had social phobia, then. 67% of them were clean of all abnormal mental conditions in early life; and showed affection for just purely animals. 52% of the 67% had a lustrious/loving interest in animals at a young age, and most had brought things like drawn pictures, photographs, etc with them, to prove their childhood was full of love to animals. Only 29% of them grew up with animals, and experienced sexual/romantic relationship with them, that stayed with them always, from there onwards. 25% either grew up with a family who didn't like animals, but wished to participate in what the other 32% did. Some of the absence of figures are because they 'refused to answer/participate, or took the other option'. You can see other surveys, like this on the internet. We discovered a lot of the bestiosexuals (not zoosexuals) were in the porn industry, did various activities and/or were pansexual, or were in a relationship with a human. I hope this helps you, in your hour of need :D.

i would have to say it would be the taboo of the whole situation. knowing that it is immoral and illegal and also frowned upon by all society would make it that much more exciting. women would find a companionship with their animal sense it is animal intstinct to be loyal to their master's wish. it would also be interesting to think that drugs would cause anyone to do anything they didn't want to do. drugs just lower the walls of the truth hidden inside of everyone, they would just use the drugs as an excuse but the truth would have to be that they have thought about beastiality before the moment when they engaged in the sex act with dog, cat, horse, snake, pig, or other crazy kinds of sex