- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
He didn't fire Rick Wagoner.
He made Wagoner's departure from GM a condition of receiving further government bailout funds, but GM could have kept Wagoner and not taken the money.
This is routine in business. Banks and venture capitalists frequently put conditions on people/organizations that they are funding.
http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2009/03/30/ceo_job_security/index.html
Fired or pressured out, what difference? If GM wants more money and the President says jump! They had better ask How high and are hoops of fire involved? Not right, not wrong, just is. We are fast moving past the point of our elected officials needing "THE RIGHT" to do something. They know what Americans, even PO ones, will do, NOTHING!
How / why did the CEO find it appropriate to step down?
I don't think he has any right to but i haven't heard of him doing so as of yet either .
The US Government is the top shareholder in GM now. Obama , in his capacity as the head of the federal government, can fire any company CEO in which the US Govt is the largest shareholder. He didn't actually fire him though. He asked him to step down.
Did he?
Why do conservatives care? They don't want Obama to ask him to step down but they don't want Obama to leave GM alone and allow the company to go under (effectively firing the GM).
I think this question is funny he cant fire anybody but he can say well you either leave or we are going to revoke your stimulus debt that you owe to the american TAXPAYERS we are litterally paying twice for vehicles if you think about taxs paid to keep them going and then you buy new vehicle doesnt make sense that everyone bash him for this. There is prime example of medicare tax payers problem like this in Texas on yahoo news same 9 people account for 1,700 ER visits I have been paying medicare for 18 years now and that is total BS why are these crackheads sucking up my money out of my salary when it wasnt designed for them. That should give you an ideal.
Tax payers vote.
When did GM bonds become junk status?
by Answerbag Staff on July 10th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
what happened to the money gm made over the past 10 years? why cant they pay off their debts with the money they made over the past 10 years
by Gohith_S on June 11th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
How many people does GM employ?
by Answerbag Staff on June 27th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What did gm pay in taxes for 2007?
by Answerbag Staff on June 14th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
what size are the transmition coolent lines on a 2001 corvette
by joe6963 on May 12th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading What right does Obama have to fire the CEO of GM?
Comments
Old School, I of course have never read the fine print in the agreement between GM and the gov. but it was a loan was it not? This was not bailout money like the free trillion (give or take a billion) that Wall Street got to wallow in.
by Phil in the Blank...backandtotheleft on April 1st, 2009
@PitB - Loan or giveaway, it does not matter. The government has the right to demand terms if it's going to shell out money.
.
When you get a home mortgage, the bank insists that you have a clean title to the house and that you provide fire insurance.
.
Venture capital firms routinely insist that company founders turn management over to experienced professionals as a condition of funding.
.
When Enron Corp. started to have financial difficulties, banks insisted that CFO Andy Fastow be fired as a condition of loaning Enron more money.
.
Whether forcing Rick Wagoner out of GM was a wise move, I cannot say (I think probably "Yes", but that's a personal opinion). But there is no doubt that the US government has the right to put such conditions on the bailout money.
by Old School on April 1st, 2009
Like I said, I don't know the fine print (terms) and if everybody involved agreed to them than yes I can see your point. Sucks for Rick. :) he did get a giant golden parachute so I'm not exactly crying big crocodile tears for him. hehe
by Phil in the Blank...backandtotheleft on April 1st, 2009