by anonymous on January 10th, 2007

anonymous

Question

Help answer this question below.

Do you think that Carbon Dating is an accurate way to determine somethings age? Why or Why not?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 3 helpful answers below.

  • by anonymous on January 10th, 2007

    anonymous

    Yes, when used with dendrochronology and Stratigraphy to verify, it is an absolute dating method for organic objects <50,000 years old.
    However, samples need to be large and uncontaminated (by recent carbon). Compensation tables (between C-14 and C-12) need to be current. The material to be dated cannot be too old, 50,000 years, or too young because in the first case the carbon has almost or completely decayed and in the second, none or very little has decayed. So, with all these variables, that is why Carbon Dating must be verified with another dating method.

    • Like
    • Report

    5 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on January 10th, 2007

    Anonymous

    I dated carbon once. She turned out to be a diamond in the rough and alot older than me.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by PocketNut is as sure as a peanut on September 28th, 2010

    PocketNut is as sure as a peanut

    That depends upon what you are dating, see this video for more detail:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APEpwkXatbY

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Do you think that Carbon Dating is an accurate way to determine somethings age? Why or Why not?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Pros and cons of carbon dating
Pros and cons of carbon 14 dating
Carbon dating cons
Pros and cons of radiocarbon dating
Cons of carbon dating