ANSWERS: 13
-
It uses rhe cinematic device "Flashback" in a whole new way.
-
Same as now...a bizarre masterpiece of intrigue, horror, mystery and flashback galore.
-
I have never seen it. Am i the only person in the world who hasn't? Am I missing anything?
-
... that it is a classic of its time.
-
They'll think... wth?? What is that thing they are riding around in... and what kind of shack is the drug dealer living in, and what's wrong with his girl? And many more questions I'm sure. ;)
-
No one can ever forget the wise words of Jules. No one. They'll probably include it in The Bible of the future. Well, they should.
-
Ahead of it's time? Maybe too good for it's time.
-
Thought it was a great movie. Hope those in the future who see it will also think it was worthwhile! Happy Tuesday! :) ((hugs))
-
I didn't care for it. But I appreciated its method... Just something about John Travolta that I just don't like. Samuel L. was brilliant though! Im sure some people in the future will feel the same in that they appreciated its writing and directing, but just didn't quite understand the use of Travolta in that particualr role.
-
That the remake was not as good as the original :)
-
If its not forgotten then we have descended even more as a species. It was self indulgent dreck. Boring, predictible, and so self-conscious that you can feel every line being forced. Tarantino is all style no substance. He understands how to edit a film but has no concept of writing (Especially for women). His best film Resevoir Dogs, was lifted from Kubricks' "The Killing" is code. I wont say he is without some talent but comparatively he is arguably the most over-rated director of our generation. In honor of him as he demonstrates with the depth of his films I suggest we abridge his name as Quententino. :) It had to be said... bring on the wrath! LOL
-
Just what the hell was in that briefcase anyway?
-
What do you think of Agnes Grey by Anne Bronte?
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 