Actually... yes, that's not a bad idea at all. Good thinking, FI! :)

Sounds like an idea with potential but where would you go if another range of levels were needed?

Good for inspiring a shit storm from the religious folks.

I would like to see it labeled Extraordinary

I think that has potential. Might piss off some of the more religious ABers though. I like it.

Ooooo! I like it when you talk "smarts." lol

That doesn't sound bad, but as mentioned, it might piss off the religious people on here. Still, I was going to suggest "God" so...>_> Yours is a much better choice. Unless they already have a title for that level, that nobody's ever seen.

Not until the person reaching that level starts performing miracles. ; )

Relgious people - pssst.... I like Deity.

Yes, especially for the polytheistic potential that it would create. ;)

No, I think that is blasphemous. And what do you call 110?

How 'bout "Centurion"? That describes the level, and shows them as leaders. Or Counselor - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counselor_(Role_Variant) Einstein? (What can be smarter than Genius? Divinity?) Titan (followed by Olympian?) But where do you go after that level? ;-)

I prefer something with no religious connotation. I vote for "Yoda"! :)

I think that is taking it a bit far. That would seem like an 'ultimate' title, so unless you start over at level 1, I'd take a pass on it.

No. Not all of us believe in God.

I think it's a good idea. I'm an atheist and I think it's fine. The first thing I thought of was Greek Gods, and I thought it was cool. I THINK WE SHOULD GO FOR IT! :D

I have no problem with it, I dont see why people should have such a fuss about a word to describe a ranking on a website, but whatever. Deity sounds great to me.

What about "EUREKA" or "EINSTIEN" these seem to be safe names and probably won't upset anyone

No , we have had enough religious titles some people of each religion find them offensive.

Could get us in trouble with the Big Fella yo...;)

No. Because deities tend to be the highest anything can accomplish, and people are bound to go higher than level 100.

no freekin way

No because I'm not even close to 100... Nah. Jk, its a good name.

HAHAHA! That's really good! I'd vote for it! hehehehe!

Yes i do, yes i do ;0)

YES AND NEXT LEVEL dali llama

In August, I answered a similar Q. This is the answer I suggested: THE Smartest man who ever lived: "Solomon" I don't think it can be any more dignified or better than that. THE Smartest man who ever lived: "Solomon". I don't think it can be any more dignified or better than that! EDIT: 8-5-08: "Solomon Bagger" I THINK that's the most appropriate title a person achieving Level 100 AND beyond should have. AND I think for every Level achieved after that, there should be a numbered designation: Solomon Bagger 1 - 1 This would be the first person to reach Level 100 would be THE FIRST Solomon Bagger. Solomon Bagger 1-2: would be the 2nd person to reach Level 100 would be THE SECOND Solomon Bagger. AND it would continue. AND/OR A designation of the categories/subject(s) he or she excelled in to achieve that Level. Solomon Bagger 1-1-RE: (Real Estate) Solomon Bagger 1-9 F-D (Food - Dining out). This would mean Solomon Bagger Achieved Level 100. He or she was the 9th to achieve that Level of excellence AND his or her primary field of achievement is Food - Dining out. Etc. The designations could be further distinguished in levels of 10 using letters: For example Solomon Bagger 1-1-A RE 110 would be "A" 120 would be "B" 130 would be "C" 140 would be "D" Etc. Thanks for asking your Q! I enjoyed answering it AND having the ability to improve that answer! Very Truly Yours, Ron Berue Yes, that is my real last name! Sources: A little thought. A little more though AND some Common Sense!