There are varying degrees of murder, and different states define these degrees differently.
First Degree Murder is the most serious. Most often, first degree murder is categorized as "deliberate" - that is, the defendant made a clear headed decision to kill the victim - and "premeditated" - the defendant actually thought about the killing before it occurred (the period for this can be very brief).
Some states consider killings committed in specific ways to be first degree murder. Although these vary by state, they can include killing by poison, by lying in wait, and by torture.
First Degree Felony Murder - A killing that happens during the course of the commission of a felony, even if the death is accidental, will be considered "felony murder" by most states. However, if the killing happens during certain felonies, again determined by state, it will be considered "first degree felony murder". The felonies most often included in this category are arson, robbery, burglary, rape, mayhem and kidnapping.
MURDER, SECOND DEGREE - In order for someone to be found guilty of second degree murder they must prove the person killed the other person with malice aforethought; and the killing was premeditated. The elements are identical with those for 1st degree murder. The practical difference is the sentences are different. Which crime to charge is usually entirely up to the prosecutor's discretion.
So between these two the difference for the prosecutor will be that they can offer 2nd degree murder to someone that they are bargining with to testify against another person.
Double Jeopardy can be argued and appealed. The Supreme Court has upheld laws allowing the government to appeal criminal sentences in limited circumstances (such as 18 U.S.C. 3742(b)). The Court ruled that sentences were not accorded the same constitutional finality as jury verdicts under the double jeopardy clause, and giving this right of appeal also did not put the defendant at risk of a succession of prosecutions.
Double jeopardy is also not implicated for separate offenses or in separate jurisdictions arising from the same act. For example, in United States v. Felix (1992), the Supreme Court ruled: an offense and a conspiracy to commit that offense are not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes."
As another example, a state might try a defendant for murder, after which the federal government might try the same defendant for a federal crime.
The "separate sovereigns" exception to double jeopardy arises from the unique nature of the American federal system, in which states are considered to be sovereigns with plenary power that have relinquished a number of enumerated powers to the federal government. Double jeopardy attaches only to prosecutions for the same criminal act by the same sovereign, but as separate sovereigns, both the federal and state governments can bring separate prosecutions for the same act. For example, Timothy McVeigh was executed by the federal government for murdering eight federal employees with a bomb, but could also have been tried in state court for murdering numerous other persons in the same explosion.
So it is hard to say or answer accurately without knowing the case. But I can say that it is a possiblity that a person can be tries again.
Comments
Are you a practicing lawyer, Angeleve?
by ----------- on December 29th, 2006
some would say I am. But I have a teaching job now , constitutional law.
by Angeleve on December 29th, 2006
Great for you! Too bad your expert legal knowledge isn't rated more handsomely here though. If I could, I'd rate ya top, professor.
by ----------- on December 30th, 2006