ANSWERS: 5
-
You're a crafty one aren't you? No, I don't think anyone should be in a combat situation. But, if there is a threat, then people need to stop it. I do think men should be in Iraq though. The Iraqi women would get lonely without them.
-
Yes if the need calls for it and there is simply no other course of action. As far as the Iraq issue While I believe that Saddam needed to be ousted, I do not believe that it was our place to go in and do it nor should we be there now. This really wasn't our war to fight to begin with. The Iraqee people should have delt with this, It wasn't our war to fight. I believe that politics are why we are there. furthermore some of our military personal have exibited behavior that is just plain dispicable. We are not there to be raping their women etc. Those that are guilty of this should be put in front of a firing squad and exicuted.
-
I don't think the war should have been started In Iraq but it has to be finished. The idea that we shouldn't put men into combat situations is laughable. People are always going to try and force their will upon others and you have to be able to defend yourself. Its sad but true. I certainly wish there was no such thing as war but since there is they must be fought at times.
-
Men, women or what have you should never be put into a combat situation unless there is a threat of loosing our way of life, our freedoms. Iraq was not one of those situations. Saddam was no threat to us, only his own people that tried to buck him. Hitler was a world threat to the free countries and a war was needed to be fought there. Korea was a political war. Viet Nam was a political war and Iraq is a political war, none of which should ever have happened.
-
1. Only if a THREAT to our country exists 2. No, after taking out Saddam--it should've been "GAME OVER." But, I guess since there's STILL oil left to steal, er, I mean, since the Iraqi people need help getting on their feet--we won't be seeing any troop withdrawals anytime soon!
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 