- NEW!
by jt007m on November 21st, 2006
If the parents of your girlfriend found out that you stole their daughter's virginity, do you promise that it will never happen again?
by Fun1 on March 18th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
How would a guy react if I told him I was 18, almost 19, and still a virgin?
by Adrnn06 on April 9th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
my girlfriend lost her virginity at 14 to her 17 year old boyfriend... I can't handle it what should I do?
by ZephyrJK on March 21st, 2012
| 1 person likes this
is this girl interested?
by sukmyduk on April 12th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
How many people have you slept with ...what does it average out per year counting from when you first became sexually active..and
by GewdGuy on March 26th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading At what age did you lose your virginity or haven't you yet? And what age are you now?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Are you bisexual then?
by queenellen on December 10th, 2006
I consider myself a Kinsey 4... Mostly because I believe that attraction occurs between people and not genitalia...
by jt007m on December 10th, 2006
ehh.
by 4theyeblind on December 11th, 2006
good answer
by tigueron on December 14th, 2006
how come with both the sex . r u a third one or what
by jigish on December 16th, 2006
I'm a 28yo man. I have a penis... not a vagina... a penis... I also have had relationships with women AND men. I've never had a preference. It's not because I'm greedy or perverted or crazy. I believe in relationships occuring between people. I don't think or feel with my genitals, so why should I limit who I'm attracted to because of theirs?
by jt007m on December 16th, 2006
Why is this a good answer? Because he had sex with both women and men, that makes this a good answer? Wow..
by Castrate on December 20th, 2006
No, because it was an honest answer I imagine.
by turbowray on December 20th, 2006
I believe in following my heart as well. Kudos jt.
by Anonymous on December 20th, 2006
Don't listen to castrate, jt007m. Props for your honesty. Also, I think it's cool that you use Kinsey's scale. It gives a view of sexuality outside of the labels gay, straight, and bi. It's a very cool idea...that love and attraction aren't restricted by gender.
by Anonymous on December 23rd, 2006
Don't listen to me? I was simply asking why this was a good answer..If I answered saying, "hey, I murdered my children, in a slow and painful way, but I kind of liked it", would that be a good answer if I was being honest? I know I know..don't compare apples to oranges..Listen, in my opinion, just because somebody is honest about something, doesn't mean they gave a good answer..At the same time, I'm not saying it was a bad one..I am curious though, if I had made a post saying, "I'm straight", would you say I gave a good answer too? Simply because I was honest? That's just silly in my book.
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
Castrate- answering "I'm straight" doesn't answer this question. It's asking for what age you first had sex and for your current age. My answer is neither good nor bad... just an answer. People might rate it up or down because it sparks a conversation and I'm totally open for that. If you take a look at my answers and comments on this site, you'll see that I'm generally a frank person and will answer with the knowledge from my extensive education and colorful life experiences. I'm in the entertainment industry, modesty and pretense is lost on me.
by jt007m on December 23rd, 2006
Yes I know that saying, "I'm straight", wouldn't answer the question. But I felt that it was you being honest about having sex with both a man, and a woman at an early age, that made some people say this was a good answer. Other people have said what age they lost their virginity at, and those people didn't say they gave a good answer..Probably because there wasn't anything different about that answer, than any of the other answers. So, I was assuming they said this was a good answer because of you mentioning that you would basically have sex with anyone, of any sex. And I have already showed the hypocrisy in that, so need I say more?
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
I never said I would have sex with anyone of any sex... Where did you get that? And I don't see how you've enlightened anyone on the hypocrisy of anything. People rate for different reasons and often, if an answer has en around for a while it might accumulated points that newer answers may not be able to catch up to...
by jt007m on December 23rd, 2006
1.)"I first had sex with a man when I was 13 and a woman when I was 14. I'm 28 years old now."
2.) "I'm a 28yo man. I have a penis... not a vagina... a penis... I also have had relationships with women AND men. I've never had a preference. It's not because I'm greedy or perverted or crazy. I believe in relationships occuring between people. I don't think or feel with my genitals, so why should I limit who I'm attracted to because of theirs?" That's where I got the idea that you would pretty much have sex with anyone, no matter what the sex..Also, I showed how hypocritical it is to rate this a good answer, because you were honest about something, but when somebody else is honest, they don't get the same response..Why not? Because you admitted something, that most people would either find disgusting, or weird..And I'm just saying, there is nothing special about your answer in my book..
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
My lack of preference between the sexes doesn't mean that I'll have intercourse with anyone that comes my way. I do have preferences when it come to physical attributes and to personalities. I agree with you that there is nothing special about my answer, but others might... and for their own reasons. Momma_bear and ErikaJ gave theirs, others might not have the words to elaborate their thoughts or emotions on the subject - nothing hypocritical about that...
by jt007m on December 23rd, 2006
Well, the way you talked, made it sound, like looks had nothing to do with it. And I assumed that meant you only cared about personality..After all, you don't feel wit your genitals, right? Anyways, I still feel they're hypocrites for saying this a special answer, but not considering another answer that didn't have anything to do with being bi..I think people take the whole, "this is the new age, we need to be open to new things" too far. They start acting like people who actually do those things, are special, and that somehow they're better..Or at least that's how it seems a lot of people act like. By the way, I have stayed up all night, and can barely open my eyes..So, I may regret typing this later..So, if I wake up in the morning, and feel completely different about the subject, then that's why..
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
Castrate, in my defense, I never actually used the phrase "good answer." I just said "props for your honesty" because, as you've so eloquently and so aggressively helped demonstrate, it takes courage to be honest about something that is societally unconventional. I also said it's cool that he chose to use the Kinsey scale to express his sexuality. He mentioned it in one of his comments rather than in his answer.
Finally, if it were hypocritical to give one person high ratings for an honest answer without uprating ALL honest answers, none of us would ever have time to do anything but be on answerbag uprating honest answers! I'm sorry but I'm not going to spend my entire life reading every answer to every question ever posted just so that I can avoid your tenuous accusation of hypocrisy.
by Anonymous on December 23rd, 2006
One more thing. I don't judge you, jt007m. I just try to live and let live.
by Anonymous on December 23rd, 2006
erika, first off, I know it wasn't you that said, "good answer".Second, I didn't say there was anything wrong with giving this a good rating, and not another. But as I pointed out earlier, being honest does not mean that your answer is good. It depends on what they're honest about, right? Because I'm sure if he admitted to killing somebody, you wouldn't be praising him for his honesty. (or at least I hope not) And I was just wondering why being honest about being attracted to both sexes, is such a great answer, is all..By the way, I don't know why you say,"our society"..how do you know where he lives? He may live in the most open minded area ever. Also, almost every time, when somebody posts something saying that they're gay, or bi, they almost always get good responses. So, at least on the internet, it's not a rare thing to see somebody talking about how gay they are. And it's not hard to admit on the internet either. Hell, it's even easy to admit to being ugly on the internet..
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
Your point well taken, Castrate. Also, in retrospect, I wish I hadn't said "Don't listen to Castrate." Every answerbagger deserves to have their say. Sorry bout that...it's easy to get carried away.
by Anonymous on December 23rd, 2006
It's ok, and thank you for not being incredibly arrogant, like most people on here..Including myself by the way.
by Castrate on December 23rd, 2006
points for your courage to say that.
by O_hare on January 4th, 2007
Castrate is easily one of my favorite people right now :)
by Tinkabelle on January 10th, 2007
i'm sorry it's kind of gross in my opinion... you're most likely athiest and athiests believe in evolution. so... technically it's against nature to be homosexual in my opinion... weird
by needhelpbadly on February 8th, 2007
needhelp, I find it rude for you to label jt007m by any means that you find satisfactory. For you to claim that he's an atheist simply for answering this question honestly is the only thing that's "weird" here. Your stereotypes aren't needed in commenting on this, nor is it required. Please think before you place your own thoughts on someone else without fully understanding the situation and the angle from which they're coming. I say this with all due respect.
by Tinkabelle on February 8th, 2007
wow, i said most likely i didn't say he was lol. and why do you say athiest is a bad term... i was just pointing out that it contradicted. I am sorry, but I could just never be attracted to another man... It's just strange to me, and i was stating my OPINION, isn't that what comments are for? Now please don't condone me for my opinion.
by needhelpbadly on February 8th, 2007
The last thing I want from anyone is to have them believe that their opinion is worth nothing. I love to hear people's opinions- which explains why I'm a member at Answerbag in the first place- and by saying that, I simply meant that there's a way to say everything, because it's not WHAT you say but how you say it. "Most likely," says that there's a high percentage rate that jt007m is an atheist, but nothing that he's said suggests it. I don't even understand where this becomes relevant in answering this question. The fact that YOU couldn't be attracted to a man has absolutely nothing to do with jt, and probably won't affect his outlook on the whole subject. Everyone is different and thinks differently. This is the way of the world.
by Tinkabelle on February 8th, 2007
p.s. I didn't say "atheist" was a bad term. To each his own. I'm not judgemental at all, and I have no desire to judge anyone's beliefs nor do I want to.
by Tinkabelle on February 8th, 2007
I don't take offense to much but I'm not sure if I should take offense to this or not... "technically" means something is fact. So are you saying your opinion is fact? By the way, I consider myself a Pantheist...
by jt007m on February 9th, 2007
To: CASTRATE. i was just passing by and couldnt help noticing your annoying comments. Just thought I'd tell you to SIT DOWN and SHUT UP. Someone needs to tell you and give you a virtual slap round the face before you hurt yourself and others. You're not as clever as you think you are. But you'll learn. I hope you manage to find peace within your angry soul. Its not impossible. I was like you once.
by benoit_gemise on February 16th, 2007
wow.
by Tinkabelle on February 16th, 2007
To Little Pugnacious benoit:..Haha, I doubt you were ever like me...You're much too stupid...Care to tell me what I said that bugged you so much? For somebody as "new" as yourself, you certainly have a BIG mouth...Now, be quiet little girl, for your opinion isn't wanted here. Do you really think telling me to sit down in all caps, is going to make YOU look intelligent at all? Just, don't say anything else, before you make yourself look any more stupid.
by Castrate on February 16th, 2007
Also, these comments have been long forgotten, as far as I knew anyway. So, congratulations for bringing up a dead subject, that nobody cared about anymore.
by Castrate on February 16th, 2007
lmao, Castrate :D That's the way to do it ;)
by Tinkabelle on February 16th, 2007
Haha, thank you Tinkabelle.
by Castrate on February 16th, 2007
Ah Castrate. You are so darn predictable. I thank you :) But anyways, apologies for "bringing up a dead subject" and upsetting you. I will leave you and your sad internet life alone now.
by benoit_gemise on February 17th, 2007
Predictable? Obviously...The most likely things I would do, after you said that, are the following: 1.)Insult you back. 2.)Agree with you, and be friends. 3.)Not do anything. And as you can see...I chose the first option. Doesn't take a lot of intelligence to "predict" that, now does it? I did what most people would have done, because it's the best response to such arrogance, I think. If you were actually trying to say your opinion, then that would be different. But you just wanted to annoy me. So, you got an appropriate response.
by Castrate on February 17th, 2007
I think the "good answer", was a response to the answer from the question of "are you bisexual." I think it was a good answer because it was indepth, it didn't just have an age and that is all. Lost manly virginity at a certain age, and virginity as it is known at another. It is two different kinds of virginity, in my opinion only. I can see where you are coming from though on the defense of no one telling someone else good answer, on what would have been expected with a question like this.
by turbowray on February 22nd, 2007
This off-topic word mincing was bitter to start with and has gone completely stale... can't we all just get along?
by Anonymous on February 22nd, 2007
Thats a lotta commewnts
by Lukezor on March 14th, 2007
well i dont think its possible to have sex with a man if your a man or a woman if your a woman the defenition of sex is either of the two major forms of individuals that occur in many species and that are distinguished respectively as female or male especially on the basis of their reproductive organs and structures
by strongARM on March 15th, 2007
Well...jt007m rules, so I win.
by Fisherofman on March 27th, 2007
That depends on if it's consensual. I mean, if you were forced it doesn't count, but if it was 'statutory rape,' it does.
by Vashtar on April 30th, 2007
strongARM makes no sense are you against teh gay comunity or sumthing since when has sex been something that only a man and woman can do together?
by Black_Squirrel on May 28th, 2007
kudos!
by Gemzibobz on November 25th, 2007
this comment strand has been dead for a while, so i want to say that i applaude you jt in your answer. It takes a strong confidence in mind an a powerful knowledge of who you are to find attraction in someone and have sexuality emerge from that as a result. :)
by Tespot was told she looks like a koala on February 6th, 2008
good answer i've allways said dont nock something until you've tried it,some people need to try both in order to find out if there straight,gay or bi.And castrate your an idiot SHUT UP.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on May 11th, 2008
I hate it when morons like yourself come on here, misunderstand what I said, and assume that I'm some kind of homophobic bastard. Leave me the hell alone. You know nothing about my intelligence, nor did you understand what I was trying to say with my comments (as your stupid comment to me suggests). Now leave me be you repugnant left-winged fascist!
by Castrate on May 11th, 2008
GO FASCISTS!!!
Ill be entirely truthfull I'm confused :P
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on July 7th, 2008
sorry im bored
Castrate quick question, why did you argue with benoit? You seem to actually base your opinions with knowledge, so why argue?
and the comments by needhelp are very wrong, if it was against nature to be homosexual then why would animals not just people interect sexually within their own gender?
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on July 7th, 2008
"Castrate quick question, why did you argue with benoit?" Benoit: "CASTRATE. i was just passing by and couldnt help noticing your annoying comments. Just thought I'd tell you to SIT DOWN and SHUT UP. Someone needs to tell you and give you a virtual slap round the face before you hurt yourself and others. You're not as clever as you think you are. But you'll learn. I hope you manage to find peace within your angry soul. Its not impossible. I was like you once." Does that answer your question?
by Castrate on July 7th, 2008
Yes but why not ignore?
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on July 8th, 2008
For the same reason that you're asking me these questions. Simple human interaction. I had no reason to ignore a direct attack on my person, so I attacked back. I see no harm in what I did.
by Castrate on July 8th, 2008
castrate you should really read some of other answers,i'm far from left wing
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on July 12th, 2008
umm...if you dont mind me askin how did that work for you? are u bisexual or straight or gay? i ask kuz my best guy friend did the same and he is REALLLY REALLY confused. offer sume help or advice? plz? thanks!
by HelloRe is anxious on August 27th, 2008
Well, I've always considered myself just sexual... even before those times. I find beauty in both sexes and my attraction isn't limit to their genitals. I would say "bisexual" but the term has gotten a negative connotation in recent years. Some people can't understand the idea. But that's how I've lived happily these 30 years.
by jt007m on August 27th, 2008
I don't mean any offense by this, but being that young, isn't that called child abuse? And does that mean all the 'pro' people who've commented are condoning child abuse? Again, I mean no offense, but having sex at such a young age with a man and woman (both adults, I'm assuming. Correct me if I'm wrong though.) seems to be very wrong, no matter what society you live in.
by Frank on August 28th, 2008
i think you've got the wrong idea i assume he was haveing sex with othere teenagers but you'll have to wait for him to confirm it.(i'm sure he would'nt have posted the info if he was abused)
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on August 28th, 2008
"I first had sex with a 'MAN' when I was 13 and a 'WOMAN' when I was 14." That does indeed sound like they were adults... And if they weren't, then I think we can agree that calling another teenage kid a man/woman, is taking it a bit too far.
by Castrate on August 28th, 2008
They were both older than me. He was 19 and she was 17, I think. I used "man/woman" just as a gender thing - not to indicate age.
by jt007m on August 29th, 2008
If he was 19, then that is still illegal. He was a legal adult, while you were still an adolescent. In other words, you were sexually abused, whether you knew it or not. I do believe your sexual activity at such a young age has effected you greatly, and not for the good in my opinion.
by Castrate on August 30th, 2008
You don't even know me! How do you know how something had affected me? I pursued him and made all the moves... It's not a black and white world. No one should make assumptions or judgments.
by jt007m on August 30th, 2008
Well then something else happened in your life to convince you that having sex with an adult male at that age, was a good idea. I'm sorry, but I don't believe you had the healthiest childhood experience if you went around doing things like that. I'm also sorry if it offends you that I believe your perverted sexual past has effected you, but I stand firm by that notion.
by Castrate on August 30th, 2008
it sounds to me like your not getting any castrate and that's why you've got a problem with jt007m.although you may not like the idea of people under 16 haveing sex if he agreed to it it then it was'nt abuse and calling it abuse insults all the kids in the world who have been.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on August 31st, 2008
Am I to understand that you support underage sex, and that your only argument against me is that "I'm not getting any"? You sir, have no idea about my sex life, and will never know, because that is not only none of your business, but it's irrelevant as well. I think you'll find that even most of the leftists on this site are against minors having sex with legal adults... I believe it takes a emotionally unstable person, to try to have sex with an adult male at that age, and you seem to have a problem with that. That's fine if you disagree, but try and use a real argument, rather than just accusing me of "not getting any", and somehow hurling my anger and frustration at this man...
by Castrate on August 31st, 2008
have i hit a nerve lol,i dont care if underage people have sex as long as there carefull frankly there are bigger problems in the world,my point was there's a very big difference between a underage person agreeing to sex with a adult and an adult forceing them selves on a underage person.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on August 31st, 2008
What did I say that makes you think that you 'hit a nerve'? If you saw any bit of frustration in my argument, it was only because of your childish response of "haha you don't get any" kind of attitude, based on nothing more than a guess. And then to top it all off, you accused me of disagreeing with perverted sexual practices, because I am basically just jealous. You sir, have poor debating skills, and are indeed talking like one of those young teens that I was referring to. I'm being 100% honest when I say this, but I really would have assumed that you were a younger teen based on your childish assumptions, and your overall attitude towards irresponsible sexual intercourse between a teenage boy and an adult male. In your profile, you claim to be 21, and if that's true, then it would appear that you still have much growing up to do...
by Castrate on August 31st, 2008
Sorry Castrate, your profile says your 19, yes? Thats still fairly young, and even if he is 21 that doesnt mean that he's any more mature than his 14 yr old counterpart. And as for sexual abuse, it doesnt have severe negative effects on everyone. Yes, there are some people who sit indoors all day for their entire lives hating themselves, or there are those who dont drown themselves in self pity and actually do something with themselves.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on September 1st, 2008
wow i didn't realise your were 19 castrate i would never have expected such a prudish attitude from someone of your age.if you believe that every one who has sex before the age of consent has been abuse then you clearly dont understand the meaning of the word so i will explain it.when a adult FORCES them self on a minor then that is child abuse and it disgusts me but as jtoo7 has said he actively pursued and agreed to have sex with them,if you beleif this is morally wrong that is your opinion but dont call it abuse.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 1st, 2008
"Sorry Castrate, your profile says your 19, yes? Thats still fairly young, and even if he is 21 that doesnt mean that he's any more mature than his 14 yr old counterpart." And your point is? "And as for sexual abuse, it doesnt have severe negative effects on everyone." I never said it was severe. If I had thought that, I probably would have recommend he get therapy.
by Castrate on September 1st, 2008
"if you believe that every one who has sex before the age of consent has been abuse..." I never said that. But it USUALLY does effect the child negatively. The fact of the matter is, a lot of kids his age think they're smart enough, or mature enough to handle such things. It's dangerous to think like that, and I will not stop pointing that out. It's more dangerous with the male than the female, because men are generally more prone to abusing the weaker in a relationship. The mere fact that you are making something that has been proven to be mentally unhealthy, seem like no big deal, shows your true maturity level. Even jtoo7 may not be aware of how acting in such a manner has effected him. Like I said before, something convinced him that it was OK to pursue an older male, and whatever that is could have effected him negatively. There is no way in hell you can convince me that what he did was any more wise than talking to strangers alone at age 3...
by Castrate on September 1st, 2008
your starting to sound like a shrink,i dont know anyone who has been mentally effected by haveing sex before the age of consent,and considering he's 28 now then i think he'd know if it had a negative effect.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 1st, 2008
First of all, 13 is really young to be having sex with a 19 year old. He was probably JUST starting to go through puberty for crap's sake! Granted, it would probably not be AS dangerous for a 16 year old with a 19 year old, but then again, it's still not the smartest thing to be doing, because it's still statutory rape, whether he was willing at the time or not. You're going down a slippery slope once you start justifying the breaking of child sex laws in my opinion... (by the way, in his profile he says he's a former heroin user, which indicates that he at least used to have emotional problems.)
by Castrate on September 1st, 2008
i'm only going to say this once i'm not condoning it but if he agreed to it then it wasn't rape or abuse,also the fact that he was a heroin addict has nothing to do with his sex life.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 4th, 2008
Just like losing my virginity, my drug use had nothing to do with anything from my childhood. I've never had emotional problems. Even the professionals I have spoken to never thought I need to do therapy or anything. Psychology was one of my studies in college. I'll be 30 in a couple months and have done my time and my studies to understand myself and human nature in order to become a true artist. Don't try to analyze me because you can't. Until we meet and you see how I live my life, you wouldn't even have the slightest clue to my psyche.
by jt007m on September 5th, 2008
All I can go on, is what you have provided to me. You claim to have been involved with statutory rape at 13, and heroin later on, so I put two and two together. I also never said that it was a fact. I simply said that it was a possibility from my view point. I don't believe what you did was very healthy at so young an age. I've never talked to a 13 year old that was emotionally stable enough to be doing such things. Regardless of whether or not you were actually negatively affected, you still didn't do the wisest thing, and I don't have to know you for that to be true.
by Castrate on September 5th, 2008
Go ahead and make judgments, assumptions, and elementary psychological/legal conclusions. Though you do not say "it was a fact", you push such ideas as truth. I'm too busy living a very wonderful and full life to care about your comments. I'm building on dreams I've had since I was a child... and they're all coming to fruition. I live in today and not in the past... and definitely in someone else's past. You can keep your ignorance, misconceptions, and your black and white world.
by jt007m on September 5th, 2008
"Though you do not say "it was a fact", you push such ideas as truth." All I did was mention that your heroin addiction and your childhood could be connected. I hardly call that pushing it in anyway. "I'm too busy living a very wonderful and full life to care about your comments." If you truly didn't care about my comments, you wouldn't have said anything. Again, I'm not trying to be offensive at all. I'm sorry if this offends you, but if you were to ask any child psychologist, they would tell you that what you did was not wise. Too often a younger person is abused sexually by older adult males. You can continue to deny that all you want, perhaps your delusion is all apart of how you have been negatively influenced.
by Castrate on September 5th, 2008
i think were both wasting our breath jt007m people like castrate are only happy when there judging others.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 5th, 2008
"wow i didn't realise your were 19 castrate i would never have expected such a prudish attitude from someone of your age." And what do you call that? If I'm not mistaken, that too is considered judging someone.
by Castrate on September 5th, 2008
i think you'll find that i made an assumption which is a lot differant to judging someone.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 5th, 2008
No, I think you'll find that telling me that I'm prudish, and relating it to my age, IS judging.
by Castrate on September 6th, 2008
as you've gone to all this effort i can only assume that i've hit a nerve and you dont like people pointing out you negative judgmental attitude so i will leave with a final thought,chill out and dont judge someone until you've been though a similar experience,also quit it with the psychology bs you sound like a shrink.the world is not black and white and there are many paths and there are all of equal merit.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 9th, 2008
Ok, so you tell me to stop analyzing people like a "shrink", and then turn around and assert your observation on the behavior of humans. Good job. I never once said that everybody reacts the same to every situation. I did say, however, that there are some things that are just not wise to do. Anyone who is willing to have sex with another person of the same sex, at that age, and with such a huge age difference, probably went through a "strange" childhood. I'm not saying strange is always bad, but I do think in this case, that he did not grow up with the best influences. "i can only assume that i've hit a nerve" You always seem to think you 'hit a nerve'... You make it seem like your main goal is to irritate me. Really, you can accuse me of judging people all you want, but expect me to counter your accusation if I feel it is unwarranted. On a side note, if you had actually hit a nerve, I probably would have been far more hostile than that.
by Castrate on September 9th, 2008
as i said before those were my final thoughts i'm sure we will meet again,good luck.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 9th, 2008
I Believe that luck is not a actual force, and has no bearing on my life whatsoever. Thanks anyway though. (yes, I would argue with a wall if I could)
by Castrate on September 9th, 2008
i must admit your very persistent,i do beleive in luck but i dont believe in the supernatural.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 9th, 2008
What does the supernatural have to do with luck?...
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on September 9th, 2008
If you believe in luck in the traditional sense of the word, then yes, you do believe in the supernatural. Luck: "the force that seems to operate for good or ill in a person's life, as in shaping circumstances, events, or opportunities" Supernatural: "of, pertaining to, or being above or beyond what is natural; unexplainable by natural law or phenomena".
by Castrate on September 9th, 2008
Yea... thanks but still havent made the connection... so tired
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on September 10th, 2008
Well, let me put it this way... Would you call somebody who is afraid to walk under a ladder for fear of getting bad luck, a superstitious individual? They are afraid of unseen forces controlling/effecting their lives. It is unexplainable by natural law, and therefor falls under the supernatural category.
by Castrate on September 10th, 2008
i quess but what i mearnt was i dont beleive in ghosts etc.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 10th, 2008
Well I've walked under ladders and had people drop stuff on me, :P. I'm not superstitious though.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on September 10th, 2008
jt, I've always considered you a friend. I'm sorry that you went through all this bullshit. But in the end, I feel smarter for having read it. And that is what a free speech forum is all about. Damned appreciative that you've put yourself out there like an open book. I do so a lot here. Leaves room for being hurt, but also makes room for a whole lot of knowing the human race better than you knew it before! Thanks again. I too have put myself on the Kinsey. I think we are all bi-sexual. And if Bi were the admitted norm (back to ancient times) then we would all be more willing to accept it in ourselves and in others.
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
Bisexuality may have been somewhat common in certain areas in the world at one time, but it was NEVER the norm. Besides, jt obviously doesn't like being called a bi-sexual, as he went to an effort to not call himself that, and even stated that the word has a negative connotation to it. He claims to not care what people think of him because he's happy, but then he says something like that. I'm sorry, but he just seems like a confused individual to me. If that offends you people, then so be it. I could care less, mainly because you people are extremely biased towards strange and perverted sexual practices (if you find this last statement to be offensive, perhaps you should read a dictionary). If somebody admits to being gay or something similar, you people get all warm and fuzzy inside, and get extremely touchy, as if the person is constantly under attack. When if anything, it's the person that objects to certain lifestyles that get attacked on here.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
You are too young to have these power and control issues. Everyone has heard your point of view, dude. How many times are you going to say it? Like all languages, English is alive. If you, like Hitler, and Klansmen think that perverts have that definition, then that's what it means in YOUR house. And I feel more sorry for you than for jt a successful artist.
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
"You are too young to have these power and control issues." What do you mean? What power and control issues are you referring to? "Everyone has heard your point of view" Yes, and I have heard yours too. That doesn't stop you from adding to your thoughts though, does it? "How many times are you going to say it?" As many times as it takes to balance out answerbag. And no, I am in no way condoning attacks on homosexuals, or anyone for that matter. I simply want people to be able to object to a certain lifestyle, whether it be underage sex, gay sex, etc... without being attacked by the left-winged majority on here. "If you, like Hitler... think that perverts have that definition, then that's what it means in YOUR house." How clever of you to compare me to Hitler, when the definition of "perverted" has absolutely nothing to do with fascism. Perverted: "showing or appealing to bizarre or deviant tastes", "Deviating from what is considered normal or correct". That's not just MY definition.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
This is the first time I have stated my opinion. You keep stating yours over and over. And obviously you apparently mean "bizarre" according to your definition. So then in YOUR house we know what bizarre means. It does not have the same definition in my house.
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
Most people do not have sex with both men and women, therefore it is abnormal, and the definition I used fits. Surely you know by now, that majority almost always rules, right? The majority of society considers murder to be an immoral, or wrong act, therefore it stays illegal. The majority of people used to believe that homosexuality was wrong, and now that's changing along with the laws. In this case, the majority of people are not gay, nor have they had sex with both men and women, therefore bisexuality is by definition perverted, strange, bizarre, abnormal, etc... If you don't like that, then that's too bad. Take it up with the dictionary. Those words are not supposed to be insults. People use those words to describe themselves all the time. I too am a strange individual, and I do not take offense to that notion.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
"This is the first time I have stated my opinion." Ha, hardly... Perhaps in this thread, but not on answerbag. Before reading your first comment, I knew that it would be in support of jt, because I have read your comments on other threads. For the same reason that you continue to "defend" homosexual behavior, I repeat myself on certain threads. Also, please note that this thread was about dead, before you brought it back up again.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
Most people are not divorce lawyers. Is divorce lawyering "abnormal"?
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
And this is a free speech forum. It is never dead. Old questions are brought back to life as each AB'er twiddles through and does their own thing. If you think questions "die" here, you really don't know very much about this site.
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
"Most people are not divorce lawyers. Is divorce lawyering "abnormal"?" In comparison to other jobs, yes. Being a divorce lawyer is not the norm, therefore it is abnormal. The act of having a job however, is not abnormal. "And this is a free speech forum. It is never dead." What I meant by that, is that the argument was pretty much over, and you started up again, and when I responded, you proceeded to complain about me being redundant.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
If this is the level of your logic, youg man, I guess I don't have anything further to say to you! Divorce lawyers are not abnormal. But...good luck trying to get through life with that brain!
by zazzy_one on September 20th, 2008
Once again, you fail to grasp the meaning of the word "abnormal". It simply means "not the norm". Abnormal: "not normal, average, typical, or usual; deviating from a standard" The standard for sex being heterosexual, because that's what most people do, and what most people think of when talking about sex. That is the norm. Gay sex is not the norm, nor is having sex with both men and women. Therefore it is abnormal behavior, simple as that. The mere fact that YOU fail to see that simple and logical synopses, tells me that you are the one with flawed logic, not I. You're not just arguing with me, but the dictionary as well, and are fighting a losing battle as a result. But... Good luck trying to get through life with that burlap sack of nuts (that can't even grasp simple dictionary definitions) you call a brain.
by Castrate on September 20th, 2008
Sir, the dictionary is not the only locale of definitions. I assume you know that words have connotations and denotations. The denotation of "abnormal," is so over-shadowed by the connotations that no one would (and no one probably ever HAS) used the word abnormal in relation to a professional job except for you, here, trying to make a lame point. And by the way, I will concede that divorce lawyering is abnormal by the dictionary definition. (Which makes me abnormal--SWEET!) However that is a mathmateical argument and it there is no reason that you would bring this up in this forum. That dictionary definition is NOT important to you line of thought.
by zazzy_one on September 21st, 2008
There is in fact no reason to say it. We all know the math. You are assuming everyone on this thread to be an idiot. By throwing up hotly connotated words and saying that you really just mean the dictionary definition. "I'm just saying there are less of them!" It is a child's game. No you don't. If you did, that goes without saying. We already know that.
by zazzy_one on September 21st, 2008
"there is no reason that you would bring this up in this forum" I brought it up, because you didn't like my use of the word to describe homosexual activity. You argued with me. I don't really care how you would normally use the word abnormal. The fact of the matter is, it is defined in that way, and I used it correctly. "You are assuming everyone on this thread to be an idiot." No, just the ones that attempt to argue with a dictionary. I only brought the dictionary into it, because you didn't like my use of the word abnormal, even though I clearly used it correctly. If you had not objected to my use of the word, I wouldn't have even gone this far with it. I have noticed that a lot of you left-wingers get offended when homosexuality is referred to as 'abnormal', which is why I was already expecting you to dislike my use of the word. If I could only get through your heads, that simply being abnormal or strange is not in and of itself a bad thing.
by Castrate on September 21st, 2008
Castrate: I would just like to thank you for standing your ground and being the only one with COMMON SENSE in this thread. I've read the whole thing and noticed everyone continually contradicting themselves, except for you.
To Everyone Else: I think you all have lost sight or are in denial of the real subject here - a 13 year-old boy having sex with a 19 year-old man.
Also, if free speech is what you all believe in, why is it so wrong for someone to have a difference in opinion?
by Frank on September 29th, 2008
B.S.
by zazzy_one on September 29th, 2008
there nothing wrong with a difference of opinion and this discussion stop being about under age sex a long time ago.and if we have all contradicted ourselves then it's because we all have a slightly differant opinion.also this whole thing was stared by castrate having a problem with jt and his honest and open sexuality and tigueron complementing him on it.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 29th, 2008
I agree. I was not "b.s.'ing" what Frank said. I actually agree with the general idea. I am b.s.'ing that that's what this whole thread is about. It became about much, MUCH more than that. If Castrate had said what Frank said, no problem. The actual problem is that Castrate in the meantime let us know EVERYthing in the world that he thinks is "abnormal," including lawyering.
by zazzy_one on September 29th, 2008
Thank you Frank. It's wonderful to know that there are still other people on here that use common sense on issues like these. "this discussion stop being about under age sex a long time ago." You can thank zazzy's complaint on my use of the word "abnormal" for that. "also this whole thing was stared by castrate having a problem with jt and his honest and open sexuality" Ha, I never said I have a problem with that. Go back and read the whole thread from the beginning if you want to see what I was actually having a problem with. Besides, this thread was started over a YEAR ago, and people still bring it back up. So I am not to blame for the argument. Again, I don't have a problem with people being open on here. I have a problem with people treating answers like this better than others, just because they're biased towards homosexuality and other perverted acts that they seem to be fascinated with. This answer is no better or worse than the others in my opinion.
by Castrate on September 29th, 2008
"I am b.s.'ing that that's what this whole thread is about" Frank never said that every single argument in this thread, was related to underage sex... That's obviously just the part of the thread he was not only focused on, but pointed out in his last comment. If you can show me where he claimed that this whole thread was about underage sex, then you have a point, but if you can't, then perhaps you ought to think before you B.S. something. What Frank obviously meant by saying "the real subject here", is that he thinks that's the most important subject that was discussed. "The actual problem is that Castrate in the meantime let us know EVERYthing in the world that he thinks is "abnormal," including lawyering." Excuse me, but you started arguing with me after I disagreed with your claim that there was a time when most people were bisexual. That then led to me describing bisexuality as abnormal, to which you started on your own mini tirade about my word usage.
by Castrate on September 29th, 2008
im happy to have this argument castrate but please stop quoting everyone in the thread it's very annoying.And for the record i'm not fascinated with homosexuality i'm happily straight but i do beleive that there is nothing perverted about being gay.
by BOOZE HOUND... nothing is nonsence on September 29th, 2008
I will not stop quoting people. That lets me address a particular statement that is being made, and leaves no doubt in people's mind as to what I'm talking about exactly. "for the record i'm not fascinated with homosexuality i'm happily straight but i do beleive that there is nothing perverted about being gay." I didn't mean everyone. Back when I first made my comment on this thread, you weren't even a member of this website. Also, gay sex is as perverted as any other type of sex that is considered anything but the norm, or the proper way of having sex, which is heterosexual in this case. Perverted: "changed to or being of an unnatural or abnormal kind", "showing or appealing to bizarre or deviant tastes", "Deviating from what is considered normal or correct.", "Of, relating to, or practicing sexual perversion." Are those enough definitions of the word perverted to see that homosexuality indeed qualifies?
by Castrate on September 29th, 2008
You made up (very republican) an argument, and are arguing against your own invented argument, Castrate. I never said at any point that there was a time when most people are bisexual. You just made it up. That is what I mean about your poor logic, son. Only on the internet could we be held by a young fellow, with poor logic who is holding up an orange yet insists it is an apple, over and over. It is the ill-logic I take exception to, not your right to free speech. We all now know what you THINK the definition of perversion is. Yet that doesn't make it true. No matter how many times you say it. It only makes it what your unfortunate family likely taught you.
by zazzy_one on September 29th, 2008
"You made up (very republican) an argument" Republican?! What statistics do you have that shows that republicans make up arguments more than other politicians? Also, even if that ridiculous statement was true, I'm not a republican anyway. "And if Bi were the admitted norm (back to ancient times) then we would all be more willing to accept it in ourselves and in others." I interpreted that as you saying that if it were like it was back in ancient times when bisexuality was the norm. If that's not what you meant, then perhaps you ought to word your sentences better rather than spewing out that last arrogant comment you made. I find it very telling that you not only make false generalizations about republicans, but you then repeatedly in front of EVERYONE deny MULTIPLE dictionary definitions of a word, simply because you don't like the sound of it. You also failed to address some points where I showed your failed logic, and understanding of what Frank said. You madam, fail.
by Castrate on September 29th, 2008
IF does not mean that it WAS! I assume that you know that. Your quote: "excuse me, but you started arguing with me after I disagreed with your claim that there was a time when most people were bisexual. " Damn boy! Read if you want to be the great orator. IF bisexuality WERE the admitted norm back to ancient times WHICH IT ISN'T/ WASN'T. Dude. I now know that...arguing you is silly. Lol. However, I will continue to clarify where need be. And yes, republicans do make things up with shocking disregard of logical consistency. I did not say that you were one. You are passionate about these perverts your concerned with. I can't take that away from you.
by zazzy_one on September 29th, 2008
To argue logically, you have to be able to read my friend. You will be a good idealogue with more experience.
by zazzy_one on September 29th, 2008
"IF does not mean that it WAS!" If, as in relation to current times, not ancient times. Ancient times was in parenthesis. I thought you were saying that if it was now, as it was then, etc... It also didn't help when you said, "I think we are all bi-sexual" right before it. You made it sound like it was normal to accept it back then. I may have read into what you were trying to say a bit, but again, you could have worded it better. Also, at best, there was a miscommunication here. The fact that you failed to respond to me the first time I mentioned it, lead me to believe further that I was correct in my assessment. "I now know that...arguing you is silly." Ha, that's a laugh. You continue to call multiple definitions from a dictionary, MY definition, as if it doesn't have to apply to you, even though you have a problem with MY use of the word. Get over yourself woman. You don't have the power to change the meaning of a word to suit you and how you feel.
by Castrate on September 30th, 2008
"republicans do make things up with shocking disregard of logical consistency" That may be true, but I don't see why you think they seem to do it more than say... democrats. I have yet to see any concrete evidence that suggests that republicans do it more than any other political party. Perhaps that's just your blind bias talking? "You are passionate about these perverts your concerned with." I admit, I enjoy using the word when I know you're reading, because you just can't seem to handle it rationally, without letting your emotions and predetermined notions of the word get the better of you. Other than that though, I would hardly say my use of the word is passionate. I must say, for being a lawyer, you sure lack the ability to use word definitions to your advantage. I've been accused of being a lawyer several times, because of how I do just that.
by Castrate on September 30th, 2008
OMFG. EVERYONE STOP. This is soo freaking stupid. going back and forth over something so dumb as this. why cant you guys focous all of your opinions and time on something that matters. like the world. None of you have the right to fight each other over the internet its makes each and everyone of you look like pathetic fools who get off on feeling smart by fighting over Ab. Seriously. Im 14 and i know this stuff is crap. Sheesh you guys all need to go back to school and learn how to grow up most of you guys are acting like first graders. Take your mellow internet drama out of Ab. its pointless, its useless, and most people here who read this junk laugh at you guys. really. =)
by Shelbs on September 30th, 2008
"OMFG. EVERYONE STOP." Oh, real mature of you to start a sentence in all caps, and an order to boot. "why cant you guys focous all of your opinions and time on something that matters." How about you mind your own business, and stop ordering us to talk about something that YOU find important? "Seriously. Im 14" I can tell... If you want people to stop arguing over something, it might be better to not be freaking out like you are little girl. You need to calm down, and maybe mind your own business too. "Take your mellow internet drama out of Ab" I just think it's adorable that you would react to our argument the way you did, and then have the balls to turn around and call us overly dramatic. "its pointless, its useless" So is ordering people around, and forcing your opinion down their throats. "most people here who read this junk laugh at you guys." Well good for them... I'm glad that I could be of some entertainment. To be honest though, I laughed when I read your comment as well.
by Castrate on September 30th, 2008
Laughing is good. but at least my comment makes sense. And now to say you just aruged with a teenager wow you are now bad freaking ass now. woah. And i wasnt forcing my opinion down there throats thank you very much, and im forceful because being 14 known gives a crap in the world on what you have to say, no matter how high you IQ scores are. And yeah. I do have balls, more than you do. =D mmkay teenage moment is over.
by Shelbs on September 30th, 2008
"but at least my comment makes sense." That comment is highly subjective, but again, I never said that it didn't make sense. Things can seem to make sense, but still be dead wrong. Also, you could have worded it way better rather than making it look like an 8 year with a temper tantrum typed it. "And now to say you just aruged with a teenager wow you are now bad freaking ass now." I'm still technically a teen myself, being only 19. This however, is irrelevant. You were the first one to point out your age, so don't get upset at me for commenting on it. I love how you came in here attempting to stop an argument, only to get into a pointless argument yourself. It's not as easy as you think to stay out of pointless arguments, is it?
by Castrate on October 1st, 2008
btw it was more like a 5 year old throwing a fit. not 8. And also i didnt know you were 19 i thought you were more like an 80yo man lying on his death bed. Ooops. My bad. Getting and stoping an argument is alot easier when some prick doesnt keep on fighting back but oh well.
by Shelbs on October 1st, 2008
He must have the last word. His tantrum has lasted long enough. Let him bring down the gavel. Most people in the world are abnormal by his 19 year old man of the world standards. I too, like you keep trying to stop. But he's immensely irritating. But whatever. Peace out.
by zazzy_one on October 1st, 2008
Sorry Shel, but when making an argument make sure you grammer and spelling are up to snuff,"And i wasnt forcing my opinion down there throats thank you very much" instead you're talking about locations while your intention was to talk about a group of people.
Zazzy, you have also made this argument longer than it would have to be. Telling someone to "stop arguing!" isnt really effective when you yourselfs are in fact arguing, the only way for him to stop would be for everyone to stop putting up another argument with him.
Sorry Castrate, it is true, arguing with you is like getting in a fist fight with a grizzly bear, endless.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 1st, 2008
Zazzy idk why he should get the last word. he didnt earn it.
Kitty as i have said many times before, grammer over comments over the internet isnt exactly important. I am an honors student at my high school and i fully understand how important grammer and spelling is, but sometimes i like a brake and prefer to chill out and not care about the rules of the english language for once in my life. And no one is going to stop this thing has gone on for what since 2007? He isnt anything like a grizzly bear. he is like a shrimp in the ocean with an ego, god he (castrate) hasnt gotten over high school yet. =)
by Shelbs on October 1st, 2008
Oh I wouldnt judge him because he can be argumentative. The fact that he has argued what he believes in shows that hes not stupid. And marks mean nothing there was no reason to drag that into the conversation. And if he were a shrimp why would you have bothered to comment? And speaking of not finishing high school, you shouldnt be one to point fingers should you?
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 1st, 2008
"Getting and stoping an argument is alot easier when some prick doesnt keep on fighting back but oh well." It takes two to tango missy, and if you hadn't responded with anything to my first response, this would have been over. I'm not generally the type that just accepts another persons criticism of me, without putting in my own two cents. So, next time perhaps you ought to consider that before putting in your own sack of fighting words into an argument.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
"Most people in the world are abnormal by his 19 year old man of the world standards." You're still on about that? No, you misunderstood what I was saying. In comparison to other jobs, the job that YOU picked is abnormal in the sense that it's not the most common, or the norm. Normal: "conforming to the standard or the common type". Having a job is the standard, but having that particular job is not. While it may not be that rare of a job, in comparison to other jobs, it is abnormal. That is all I was saying. Again, the type of sexual interaction with other people that jt had, IS abnormal whether you like it or not.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
"Sorry Castrate, it is true, arguing with you is like getting in a fist fight with a grizzly bear, endless." That's probably true, as I have never denied that to be the case. People just get upset when I don't give in. I really only truly give in, when I have been proven wrong, or convinced that I am wrong (which is rare). I must say though, this argument would have been over a long time ago if one of them had chosen to end it. I never keep going once the other person has stopped. Again, this argument was largely based on opinions, and these kind of arguments CAN last forever, especially when neither person is willing to give in. I will mention though, that I have gotten out of a few arguments that I can see isn't going anywhere for too long. I do have my breaking point, trust me.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
"Zazzy idk why he should get the last word. he didnt earn it." I could care less if I get the last word. Though, If the last comment you left was for/about me, then I will most likely respond to it. "but sometimes i like a brake and prefer to chill" The word you're looking for is break (sorry, couldn't resist). "this thing has gone on for what since 2007?" 2006 actually... Notice though, that I had stopped a long time ago. I had even forgotten about this argument, but then somebody comes a long and reopens the argument. Blame the person that added the fuel and started the match, not the fire. "He isnt anything like a grizzly bear. he is like a shrimp in the ocean with an ego" Haha, that's actually quite funny kid. I've always just referred to myself as a bulldog.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
I must say kitty, you seem like a pretty analytical individual. I agree with pretty much everything you said, even if you hadn't added in the compliments. What you said (as far as I'm concerned) was fair, and addressed everyone in the argument. Now, if everyone else is done arguing wit me, I'll be happy to stop. However, if you want to address anything I just said, expect me to most likely reply to it.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
great what ever. and you know what the reason kitty that i said he acts as if he hasnt left high school is because im in it and i notice how GAY AND FREAKINE DUMB people are. duh. and Casttrate you can stick your freaking quotes up that stubborn butt of yours. im out.
by Shelbs on October 2nd, 2008
BTW YOU ARE NOTHING LIKE A BULLDOG. HAHAHA. and dont call me a kid you only 4 years older than i am. big freaking differance.
by Shelbs on October 2nd, 2008
Wow, I've really brought out the little kid in you, haven't I? Somebody has a bit of a temper. "dont call me a kid you only 4 years older than i am." Actually, I'm closer to 5 years older than you. Besides, not only am I a legal adult, but you are acting childish, so I'm treating you as such. You're obviously letting your anger get the best of you, so I would suggest a time out.
by Castrate on October 2nd, 2008
Castrate your getting close to a spankin :P. I may live in Canada but I have a valid passport and money.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 2nd, 2008
ur right. i do have a temper. a huge one. being a legal means jack crap and you know it, you cant ever drink yet. giving my a time out? ahahahahahha who are you my father? mmmm i dont think sooo
by Shelbs on October 2nd, 2008
Oh right you guys have to wait past 18. AHAHAHAHAHA
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 2nd, 2008
hahaha 21 to purchase legally.
by Shelbs on October 2nd, 2008
Hahaha 18.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 2nd, 2008
lucky! although i could always drive to mexico and get wasted 18!!! =)
by Shelbs on October 2nd, 2008
Yea but still your far too young to be drinking. I didnt actually drink at parties till I was 16, even then I didnt drink much.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 2nd, 2008
yeah but people from california tend to grow up faster than everyone else.
by Shelbs on October 3rd, 2008
Haha your pretty funny, unless everyone living in California has maybe a tumour on their petuitary gland, then yes maybe I would agree with you. Everyone matures physically at the same rate.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 3rd, 2008
uh i wasnt talking about physicaly. mentally.
by Shelbs on October 3rd, 2008
Thats proof right there that Californians dont mature any faster, show some reputible facts and I'll believe it.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 3rd, 2008
I don't need to be 21 to drink, trust me. I have all the alcohol I want right here in my house. California matures faster you say? California is filled with hippies and tree humpers. I've talked to a 13 year old kid from there, that thought there has been millions of "innocent" civilians that got killed when we entered Iraq, which he was told at his school. I'll also note that California voted for Hillary Clinton in the primaries. Fail, fail, fail, FAIL... Also, according to this chart from 2006-2007, my state is rank 6 on the smart scale, whereas yours is way down at rank 47. http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank.htm If your state truly matured faster, they would have studied more and wouldn't be only 3 ranks away from last in in this Morgan Quitno’s fifth annual Smartest State Award. Great, now I find myself playing childish and competitive mind games... Oh well, sometimes I can't help myself.
by Castrate on October 3rd, 2008
Thank you Castrate. And there is nothing wrong with humping trees.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 3rd, 2008
"there is nothing wrong with humping trees." Maybe not "wrong" per se, but it does reflect ones maturity level in my opinion.
by Castrate on October 3rd, 2008
Haha, that was clearly a joke, unless you hadent noticed.:P
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 3rd, 2008
uh i wasnt talking smarts either.
by Shelbs on October 3rd, 2008
Honestly I am terribly sorry but you have no idea what your talking about, so why dont you stop while your only slightly behind.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 3rd, 2008
Kitty, I'm quite aware, but so was I (in case you hadn't noticed). I was only attempting to keep it on track, so that I didn't confuse Shelby any further than she probably already was.
by Castrate on October 4th, 2008
i am confused. like seriously. haha.
by Shelbs on October 4th, 2008
one to many drinks tonight.
by Shelbs on October 4th, 2008
Castrate, I completely lost my train of thought... Shit, that sucks.
by kittygoesmoo- engaged...finally on October 5th, 2008
ok, i know i'm going to sound hypocritical when i say this... but i cannot believe how judging you all are of each other, i mean seriously? you all argue over who has a right to say what, but apparently only those who are politically correct can say what they want. well some info for ya, you shouldn't condemn someone for speaking their mind. look: even i'll speak my mind. i really find it disgusting that anyone would have sex with someone of their own sex. its just not how we were made. but besides that, i also find it gross that you all are SO judging, you judge each other for judging even! its ridiculous, you tell people that they can't say something that might keep someone from saying something. i know i'm judging, but i'm only judging the fact that you all are so critical about something that shouldn't matter to. its not your business what thoughts they put on here, they're entitled to them. and those were my thoughts. you need to all just understand we're all different.
by Anonymous on September 24th, 2009