by JAMMco... its complicated... on July 11th, 2007

JAMMco... its complicated...

Question

Help answer this question below.

Do the benefits of animal testing outweigh the discomforts and possible death of the animal? If there were no animal testing... what is the alternative... human testing? Which is worse?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by WHITE BEAR on July 11th, 2007

    WHITE BEAR

    A race that chooses to extend their lives or increase their medical knowledge through the barbarity and cruelty of animal testing is seriously misguided and ethically unjustifiable.
    There is the option of human testing.
    We have seen that drug companies have produced drugs that have caused heart attacks (Vioxx for example) and it was supposed to be safe after having being tested on animals.
    Animal physiology is significantly different to our own and it is not possible to predict what effect a drug might have on a human by giving it to an animal.
    Animal testing is clearly worse, as human testing involves consent.

    Comments
    • If its barbarous and cruel to animals, wouldn't it be the same or more so to humans with or without consent... or is consent the only thing that makes it barbarous and cruel? Save the animal, kill the human?

      JAMMco... its complicated...

      by JAMMco... its complicated... on July 11th, 2007

    • Yes save the animal. I have decided to opt for death rather than use an animal tested product should it come to it.

      WHITE BEAR

      by WHITE BEAR on July 11th, 2007

    • So should you get a tumor, don't take the drugs to reduce its size, because it was tested on animals to make sure you don't die from it. Should you be given a prescription from your doctor ask him for a drug that hasn't been tested on an animal and volunteer to be part of that first round of tests straight from the lab. The next time you go into surgery make sure you request that nothing thats been tested on animals goes into your body or touches your body... but make sure you have your affairs in order and say your good bye's to your family first. Too many LIFE SAVING things result from Animal Testing to ban it. There are needless testing that involve animals that goes on, no doubt about that, but not all animal testing is cruel and not all animal testing can be stopped. Its a balance, one that many people can't grab hold of when they begin a crusade. Too many people see things as ALL or NOTHING... Not all things are good, not all things are bad.

      JAMMco... its complicated...

      by JAMMco... its complicated... on July 12th, 2007

    • What is really barbaric is to advocate testing medicines on humans rather than other animals. PETA is the group that is seriously misguided and ethically unjustified. It is PETA propoganda you mindlessly copy here, and it makes no sense. You say you prefer to die to using products animal testing provide us. Well, I do not, and some of your family probably does not either. Would you deny your own child life-saving medicine just because it was the result of animal testing? If you did, you should be executed for murder.

      MegumiS

      by MegumiS on November 16th, 2010

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Do the benefits of animal testing outweigh the discomforts and possible death of the animal? If there were no animal testing... what is the alternative... human testing? Which is worse?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads