ANSWERS: 41
Visit the Gallery today!
Decorate your life
Ad
-
Lots of love, with poor sex.
-
Marriage with love, definately. That's more important :)
-
Loveless with great sex.
-
lots of love. Poor sex. Because guess what... practice makes perfect:)
-
Love love love
-
I would choose to be on my own! Unless the marraige was 30 odd years old and the great sex had fizzled but the love was still strong. It's all about timescales with this one!
-
I'm going for the sex, hey at least i'm honest.
-
The marriage full of love.
-
I doubt that a marriage full of love would have poor sex. It's just not possible. Even if the person was paraplegic, you could still enjoy some kind of meaningful intimacy. I would never settle for a marriage that wasn't full of love. Sex just isn't that important in the overall picture and there is no such thing as bad sex among those that love.
-
marriage full of love, sex is not the only way to get intimacy and happiness
-
Full of love with poor sex, I could always teach him how to have great sex bwahahaha!!!
-
full of love, because what if something tragic happened and sex was no longer a possibility, what do you do get divorced? if the marriage is based on love it is able to withstand obstacles.
-
i want marriage with love and bad sex. I can teach my husband how to "work it" haha and if that doesnt work i can always reach into my nightstand for my "little friend"
-
Sadly, both things go very closely together. Now, you could have a loveless marriage with lots of money and no sex or a marriage full of love with lots of Viagra and no money but, someone, your scenario doesn't jive
-
With this qualification I'd want two women, one for great sex and the other for love. Since there is no overlapping in what they want and what they're willing to give, there should be no jealousy. I.e., Since #1 wants only sex, she should not be jealous of #2, who wants only love. Since #2 wants only love and she's not interested in sex, then she shouldn't be jealous of #1, who wants only sex. Problem solved! I'm now accepting volunteers. Please line up outside the door for your interview. :)
-
the 2nd
-
What's poor sex? Poor sex to me is none at all. I'm in a loveless marriage, I know. 20 years of regret! Thank God for the Internet and cybersex!
-
I would rather have lots of love. I can always **** myself!!
-
A marriage full of love with poor sex. There is always porn and I can play with myself. Plus, even bad sex is better than no sex.
-
I say im a very attention seeker and if my man doesnt love me like i should be loved ill fnd someone who really appreciates me but i loooovvveee sex... I say i have to have both of them or im out.
-
Full of love with very poor sex.. at least I can count on him never cheating on me with another woman in order to find compatibility and love. What's the point of having great sex when you're doing it with a person who broke your heart?
-
You can't fix or fake love, the sex will always be awesome with someone you're in love with. With love, bad sex is fun to fix! :)
-
Full of love,...even with poor sex!
-
I would rather be in a marriage full of love. You can get sex anywhere but you can't get love from just anyone.
-
A loveless marriage with great sex
-
A marriage full of love but with very poor sex. By the way... Don't know if you're aware of this or not, but the only "poor sex" is no sex.
-
Love would make up for poor sex. This question hinges on an understanding of 'marriage full of love'. I don't think most people can imagine that fully. I have the immense pleasure of having a marriage full of love AND great sex. Actually the sex started out pretty crappy, my wife had never HAD good sex before, so she didn't know what to do. As our love grew, and her trust grew, our sex became better. Now, I have absolutely no desire to be with anyone else. Even Jessica Alba would have to hear me turn her down. (Like THAT opportunity would ever come!)
-
theres such a thing
-
Even bad sex with the person that you love with all your heart is great sex. :-)
-
you need to have both. . .or not be in the relationship. if I had to choose I'd take the sex, because ...if its good sex people don't breakup, and the full of love stuff will get old. .
-
No marriage.
-
Depends is the sex just with me?
-
No marriage at all..and great sex would be nice, but, if not..that can be fixed..lol
-
If you really love someone i dont think there is a such thing as poor sex. If you love them you should be worrying about pleasing them and not your self anyways. Well to answer the question i would chose a marrige full of love with poor sex.
-
Great sex. Marriage is already bad enough the man might as well get something good out of it. We have to be puppets to the laws of feminism and society anyways.
-
Marriage full of love but with very poor sex. Human companionship is very important too. Good companionship last 24/7, good sex last half an hours or so.
-
Now if you know me this is going to come as a huge surprise...but i'm actually going to say I'd rather have lousy sex with a lot of love. *solution* Porn wait, maybe this isnt a surprise.
-
i would rather have the marriage that is full of love...
-
loveless marriage great sex. we could disagree on every topic in the world and thats ok with me. i know people have different thoughts/opinions and im no more right then the other. but if were having great sex its not guaranteed but pretty likely that she wont be looking somewhere else to fulfill her sexual needs. and i wont be tempted to go outside the marriage either.
-
What's the third since marriage is not an option in my humble opinion?
-
I'd take the great sex every time!! good sex is important for your overall health...........TRUE!!!!
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC