Yes. Waterboarding

No. He's just defending the the USA during a time where people are hijacking our airplanes, crashing them into buildings, and killing thousands of Americans.

That's a good start! Then when found guilty we here in the states could impeach him or just tar & feather then drawn and quartered.....

I wish he could be as well however I understand he cannot because the USA has never signed that agreement and refuses to do so. The same with Tony Blair in the UK.

Antigonerising I have seen many of your answers and am well aware of your feelings about our President and have always respected your opinion even though I don't agree with it. I hope I can trust you enough to be mature and respect what I am about to say. I do not believe that the Prresident has done anything wrong to deserve being put on trial when it comes to Iraq. If anything the only thing I think he is guilty of is not having a better plan like his father did of how to get in and out quickly. First off to all of those misinformed individuals who believe that WMD's specifically refer to nukes and nukes only the title does not refer solely to Nuclear weapons. WMD's include any and all conventional weapons which can be used to swiftly wipe out mass amounts of life in a single hit. Many chemical and biological agents placed on a conventional warhead are more than capable of killing tens if not hundreds of thousands of people in one fast hit. Just because these agents have not been found does not prove they never existed. Saddam was a reasonably intelligent man who could have easily either destroyed, hid well, or exported such weapons to a friendly neighboring nation at any given time in the days and weeks leading up to the invasion. Stop listening to the ultra liberal media who tells you that the WMD's were a lie. They existed even if they still have not been found. Mark my word one day it will be proven that the WMD's were not a lie.

I could equivocate here by saying that "the decider" decides nothing..he works from a script provided him by "dickie c" and the neocons..he doesn't have any original thoughts..he just mouths that which others tell him to say..but he does wear the mantle of President so yes, he and "dickie c" and all the neocons are all guilty of war crimes..I would love to see an international war crimes tribunal take this on as our congress has no backbone nor intestinal fortitude nor character to do so. War crimes were committed by these creatures... hundreds of thousands of innocent people dead ..for a war that should never have been initiated by us. Will it happen? I don't know..one can only hope. If not for war crimes, how about subverting our Constitution? How about killing our Justice Department? How about invading the privacy of we the people? How about supporting big business at the expense of the little guy because big business has big bucks and they are money/power hungry and worship at the altar of Lobbyists who contribute big bucks. Pick a reason..any reason. :(

I don't see why not. Besides, what's he got to be afraid of if he hasn't done anything wrong? ;)

Yes absolutely. I think he should be impeached and put on trial for crimes against humanity. Congressman Dennis Kucinich has submitted 35 articles of impeachment against Bush. It's being ignored by the mainstream media. I think this is a good summary of this crimes. I think he's guilty of all of them except no. 32. Article I Creating a Secret Propaganda Campaign to Manufacture a False Case for War Against Iraq. Article II Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression. Article III Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, to Manufacture a False Case for War. Article IV Misleading the American People and Members of Congress to Believe Iraq Posed an Imminent Threat to the United States. Article V Illegally Misspending Funds to Secretly Begin a War of Aggression. Article VI Invading Iraq in Violation of the Requirements of HJRes114. Article VII Invading Iraq Absent a Declaration of War. Article VIII Invading Iraq, A Sovereign Nation, in Violation of the UN Charter. Article IX Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor. Article X Falsifying Accounts of US Troop Deaths and Injuries for Political Purposes. Article XI Establishment of Permanent U.S. Military Bases in Iraq. Article XII Initiating a War Against Iraq for Control of That Nation's Natural Resources. Article XIIII Creating a Secret Task Force to Develop Energy and Military Policies With Respect to Iraq and Other Countries. Article XIV Misprision of a Felony, Misuse and Exposure of Classified Information And Obstruction of Justice in the Matter of Valerie Plame Wilson, Clandestine Agent of the Central Intelligence Agency. Article XV Providing Immunity from Prosecution for Criminal Contractors in Iraq. Article XVI Reckless Misspending and Waste of U.S. Tax Dollars in Connection With Iraq and US Contractors. Article XVII Illegal Detention: Detaining Indefinitely And Without Charge Persons Both U.S. Citizens and Foreign Captives. Article XVIII Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy. Article XIX Rendition: Kidnapping People and Taking Them Against Their Will to "Black Sites" Located in Other Nations, Including Nations Known to Practice Torture. Article XX Imprisoning Children. Article XXI Misleading Congress and the American People About Threats from Iran, and Supporting Terrorist Organizations Within Iran, With the Goal of Overthrowing the Iranian Government. Article XXII Creating Secret Laws. Article XXIII Violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. Article XXIV Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the Fourth Amendment. Article XXV Directing Telecommunications Companies to Create an Illegal and Unconstitutional Database of the Private Telephone Numbers and Emails of American Citizens. Article XXVI Announcing the Intent to Violate Laws with Signing Statements. Article XXVII Failing to Comply with Congressional Subpoenas and Instructing Former Employees Not to Comply. Article XXVIII Tampering with Free and Fair Elections, Corruption of the Administration of Justice. Article XXIX Conspiracy to Violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Article XXX Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare. Article XXXI Katrina: Failure to Plan for the Predicted Disaster of Hurricane Katrina, Failure to Respond to a Civil Emergency. Article XXXII Misleading Congress and the American People, Systematically Undermining Efforts to Address Global Climate Change. Article XXXIII Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911. Article XXXIV Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001. Article XXXV Endangering the Health of 911 First Responders.

No. He acted with congressional approval, therefore, if there are any charges, not only Bush but every member of Congress would have to be impeaced and tried. While we're at it, why not dig up John F. Kennedy and put him on trial for starting the Vietnam War? Or Franklin D. Roosevelt for World War II? Or do you ONLY want to prosecute Republicans?

That is an interesting question. Quintessentially you are asking if the US should give up it's sovereignty. I really do think international government is a good idea, but right now I don't think we are ready for it (at all). Therefore I would have to say no.

Yes, he should. If, as many still claim, he has done nothing wrong, he will be cleared and it will all be out in the open.