- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Well really you need an even number of engines (having more weight on one wing is avery bad thing), however, one engine can be put in the fuselage, or two engines in the wings and one in the tail etc.
Probably just because technology made small, coincidental leaps forward at the proper times for five and seven to get skipped.
But it might also have something to do with the fact that five and seven are both uneven prime numbers higher than the number of basic frame components on a typical aircraft (3: body, and two wings), and as far as I can tell, that makes them rather awkward numbers of engines to try to position aerodynamically on a conventional aircraft frame.
In order to make five engines aerodynamically functional, you'd practically have to build a plane on the model of a Thai Fighter.
And I can't even imagine how you'd engineer an aerodynamic balance for a large, prime number like seven...
The Ash Cloud Thing, Couldn't Jet Aircraft Fly Well Below the Cloud, then Increase Altitude When Clear?
by mdGreg on April 16th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Have you ever seen this cool plane?
by XT on September 3rd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
About how many kinds of planes can you personally recognize by seeing them fly overhead?
by GeorgeGee left Answerbag (What's this?) on April 30th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What is this thing flying in the sky?
by futureMarine on August 1st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
how is the a380 performing in service
by ezyrod on June 21st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why are there planes with 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 engines, but (as far as I know) none with 5 or 7?
Comments
Well the 727 has three.
by KevinW42 on July 7th, 2008
Yes, an engine in each wing and one in the tail.
by QueenR eats the Terminator for breakfast on July 7th, 2008