How would you like to kill? (ex or current spouses, boss or next door neighbor don't count. We gave to be able to identify with this person) My first choice: President Amadinejad of Iran, then Kim ill of N Korea. bin Ladin would be 3rd.

Comments

• Some good points. Saddam was compared to Hitler. Saddam was not nearly as bad nor dangerous. But is Bush was so upset with Saddam, the two of them should have had a slug fest. Balancing things out a bit have Cheney and Rumsfeld. But, there is a point that elimination of someone such as Hitler could have saved millions of lives. In 1966, President Johnson sent me to Vietnam to kill is enemies. In retrospect I would have liked not to have participated. Millions of lives for nothing.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 12th, 2008

• Great answer Tsamaya.

  • Report
  

  by Gingerminx on June 27th, 2008

• Well, if a person can and will kill millions and you don't take actions. You effectually become a mass murderer.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 27th, 2008

• The only natural predator for man is man, horrible as it is war is sometimes the only way nature has of controlling our population. Personally, I am totally against war and would even find it hard to kill someone in self defense, I would much rather man learned to control his breeding.

  • Report
  

  by Gingerminx on June 27th, 2008

Comments

• Yeah business men are worse than kid touchers. OK.

  • Report
  

  by Aintthatapip - Kevonian Overlord on June 27th, 2008

• Plenty of that happening and getting worse.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 27th, 2008

• Don't worry, I'd get to them all. And I was basing my priorities on volume of damage, those guys ruin thousands of lives per person not giving a shit whether their endeavors help to degrade society or not. Of course morally pedos are worse

  • Report
  

  by Chezter is going to save the Redheads on June 27th, 2008

Comments

• I almost agree. Yet every one in a million or so politicians actually turn out good. I don't want politicians that agree with me. Just honest and not radical. The very to opposites are the reasons they usually get into politics.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 12th, 2008

Comments

• Couldn't agree more.

  • Report
  

  by Gingerminx on June 27th, 2008

Comments

• Couldn't hurt. But it is so common that someone wants another political party killed and they send out an army of hundreds of thousands or millions to do the job. And they should have the huevos to do it themself.
  
  As a combat veteran in Vietnam, I can assure everyone tat soldiers fight for the benefit of staying alive and not losing body parts and nothing else. Takes about 10 minutes in combat to realize the true enemy.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 12th, 2008

Comments

• I'll just comment on a single aspect of your response. There is only one race. The Human Race. Beyond that there is nationality and ethnicity.

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 27th, 2008

• This is a test to see if my response to your comment is taking hold! Prior to this I posted a comment to your response, but I can't seem to see it recorded anywhere!

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 27th, 2008

• I said something like this: they tend to blend nationality, ethnicity and religious denomination together. If they refuse to make a distinction why should I?

  • Report
  

  by Anonymous on June 27th, 2008

Comments

• YOU STOLE MY ANSWER I WAS GETTIN READY TO PUT THAT.

  • Report
  

  by NerdyGirl57 on May 17th, 2011

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments