First of all, Satans, it’s great to see you posing a really good question. I’d be lying if I said that experience didn’t make me a bit wary, but perhaps you’ve had a Saul of Tarsus moment? Regardless, I happy to say I’ve finally been able to uprate you. :-)
Unfortunately, I don’t think this question can be answered particularly easily. For one thing, if the Book of Mormon and its teachings are true, then “Christian” and “Latter-day Saint” will eventually be fairly synonymous. Sure, there will be people that accept Jesus as their Savior but don’t accept the fulness of His Gospel, but does someone that doesn’t accept Christ’s teachings qualify as a Christian? I would argue no. This is semantics, though, so let’s move on.
The next issue in play here is that the veracity of the Book of Mormon and its teachings doesn’t necessarily imply that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is God’s true Church on Earth. There are plenty of other religions that use the Book of Mormon: not only are there several Latter Day Saint sects, but I’ve even heard of Baptists that believe in the Book of Mormon and its teachings! Thus, an appeal to the Book of Mormon in and of itself doesn’t really answer this question at all.
As an aside, this last paragraph is why I take issue with a statement once included in the standard missionary discussions: something to the effect of “Once you know the Book of Mormon is true and that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God, you’ll know that this is His true Church.” I laughed at the missionaries when they told me that, told them that all that would tell me is that the Church was true 150 years ago. I asked them if there was a *living* prophet (which there was), asked him what *his* name was (Ezra Taft Benson), and told them that I would be happy to pray to know if *he* were a prophet of God. They were a bit taken aback by my logic, but were actually pretty cool with it. And the rest, as they say, is history: seventeen years later, I’m still an active member of the Church, and I think my testimony is in fact stronger for having asked the right questions in the first place. But moving on….
The third issue here is that, even if we accept The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to be the true Church (and thus the Church that correctly understands the Book of Mormon and its teachings), there will be a great many people that go to both Hell *and* Heaven, in that order. The “Hell” of Latter-day Saint theology is not the antithesis of “Heaven”; rather, it is synonymous with “Spirit Prison” and thus the antithesis of “Paradise,” where Christ’s people (defined as those that have been baptized into His Church and remained faithful to Him and His Gospel) go to await the resurrection. Anyone that hasn’t been baptized into His Church—or has, but for whatever reason hasn’t really accepted Him—would go to Hell, but would then have the opportunity to be taught His Gospel and, eventually, to be baptized by proxy (if this ordinance is not still in effect from mortality). It is only after the resurrection and so-called “Final Judgment” that we will arrive at our “final” destination, be it the Celestial, Terrestrial, or Telestial Kingdom (all of which could be deemed “Heaven”) or, in the case of the Sons of Perdition, Outer Darkness (which would be what many non–Latter-day Saints think of as “Hell”).
So now we (finally) move on to the second part of your question: if the Book of Mormon and its teachings were false, it would necessarily imply that the Bible is also false, since the two Books claim the same source and teach the same doctrines. Thus, it stands to reason that Jesus would not be the Christ and the entire Christian way of thinking would likewise be incorrect. If this were the case, I have no idea where either Latter-day Saints *or* other Christians would go, since we haven’t established what *would* be the correct identity of Heaven and Hell, nor the criteria for arriving at either destination (if either destination even exists).
Breaking down this part of the question some more, I suppose you actually meant to imply something along the lines of “Where would Latter-day Saints go if the Bible were true but the Book of Mormon were not?”—a plausible scenario, since even if we assume 100% accuracy of doctrine, that still doesn’t *necessarily* make the Book of Mormon what it purports to be (e.g. an essentially historically accurate, ancient work). In this case, the correct response is still extremely questionable, since there are so many different interpretations of the Bible. Frankly, the only way I know of to determine which interpretation is correct is the method set forth by so-called “Mormonism”: that of asking God for the answer. Unfortunately, if we assume the Book of Mormon to be of questionable authenticity, even that method becomes highly unreliable, since we already know that its use has led some 15,000,000 people to believe the Book of Mormon to be true (in direct opposition to this theoretical scenario).
So bottom line: it really is a great question, but it really is one with no easy answer.
HTH!
Comments
Could not have said it better myself, solistics!
by denidowi on September 29th, 2008