Should the murderer be given to the relatives of the murdered?
by 
Orangy Energy
ANSWERS: 9
-
Yes. Barring that, he should be executed using the same method used to commit the murder (including any ancillary damage).
-
Then relatives will murder the murderer,then those relatives has to be handed over to the relatives of the murderer........chain will be quite long. Half of the people of world will be wiped out man!
-
No, the carnage would be inhuman.
-
Oh yes. Not only that, the murderer should have no rights as a human and the relatives should have legal permission to do whatever they want. *waits for the downrates*
-
the family could keep the murderer locked up in a cage as a pet and forget to feed it when they go on holiday
-
yes and he derserves what ever they do to him
-
No he should be placed in the hands of a just judge!
-
Yes. But only for prevention sake. If that were the case, you would see the number of murders drop like you never saw anything drop before.
-
Just so people don't dismiss or pigeonhole my answer, I'll first say that I'm not what most people would think of as a Christian. I understand the impulse to say yes, however, Jesus said "Because lawlessness is increased, most people's love will grow cold". I don't want that to happen to me, and I don't want to live in a society where criminals are tortured and painfully killed with government sanction. I want to live in a country which has the rule of law. I don't believe that anybody except sociopaths could could kill somebody and not be changed for the worse by it, and I believe that it would brutalize the killers. That's aside from the question of mistaken convictions, of which many (not enough) have been discovered and thrown out.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC