There are no good or bad actions, just ones that cause evolution or stagnation. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
by 
Mrs.Dufresne rediscovers Alana Davis
ANSWERS: 6
-
The statement is inaccurate and simplistic.
-
Disagree strongly. Man is a community animal - actions that help the community, in the widest sense, are good. Actions that hinder it are bad. The evolutionary effect arrives as a secondary.
-
I gotta disagree...
-
I completely disagree.
-
No I do not agree even in the slightest form . It is appallingly inaccurate.
-
The statement is only agreeable to an honest Materialist who doesn't believe in good or evil (or anything transcendant) in the first place... ... and even they would have a problem with the implicit association/confusion of "evolution" with "good" and "stagnation" with "bad". For the Materialist, there is survival or extinction: stasis/equilibrium/preservation is a much bigger part of the survival engine than is adaptation/evolution. Stasis/equilibrium does not imply "stagnation" and thus decay: it declares SUCCESS! Adaptation is just what organisms have to do when the !@#$$%#!! environment goes and changes again! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- But, not being a Materialist myself, I totally disagree with the statement.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC